Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faculty of Chemical Technology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:52, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Faculty of Chemical Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has been entirely uncited for 9 years, which is a problem in itself, though when searching for this I don't believe this meets notability guidelines. This is simply a departmental section of University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague (which is a valid page) and is the only one from that page that has its own article.

The article itself sounds like it's just lifted from a web page and is rather uncyclopedicly written because of it. If this page is voted for keeps it should be improved and cited. I considered proposing merging, but given the information on the main university page it already has enough relevant information. Maybe a sentence or two could be added.

Sometimes, a department page for a major university is warranted if there is very significant research there historically, major history, etc that makes it noteworthy. For this though, I was not able to find sufficient sources to validate its keeping --Tautomers(T C) 21:38, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:42, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:43, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, already mentioned at target. Mdewman6 (talk) 18:47, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.