Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/German New Zealanders
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Kurykh (talk) 02:51, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- German New Zealanders (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
See AfD discussion on this DrStrauss talk 11:27, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 11:29, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 11:29, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 11:29, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 11:29, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- keep a long history of migration to New Zealand. In fact this source says around 200,000 kiwis have some German heritage. LibStar (talk) 12:15, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep – There are heaps of German New Zealanders; meets WP:GNG. J947 19:07, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep During WWI, there was a very strong anti-German movement in New Zealand. Villages with German names, founded by German settlers, were renamed (e.g. Ranzau became Hope). The German Church in Christchurch was taken over by the Crown. Longstanding and previously highly regarded German New Zealanders were persecuted. All of that received lots of media coverage. That period alone achieves GNG for this group of people. Schwede66 00:16, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Aricle needs work, but shouldn't be deleted.--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 05:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - as per my nomination.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:54, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.