Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innova Solutions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. No consensus for deletion, and nom appears to have reconsidered; it looks like the rest, including a possible merge, can be sorted out through normal editing. (non-admin closure) asilvering (talk) 04:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Innova Solutions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP, WP:SIRS. scope_creep^Talk 02:47, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:48, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:48, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:49, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:49, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

* Keep - Keep notable company. If this page cannot be kept, it should be redirected to Volt Technical Resources. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:59, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Curious how you !voted keep on it, when the sources and coverage are so chronically bad. Why is that, I wonder? scope_creep^Talk 17:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Reply - I gave it some thought. Perhaps subsidiary Volt Information Sciences could be merged into conglomerate Innova Solutions. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:54, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge with Volt Information Sciences: Since the subsidiary of Volt Information Sciences is not qualified to pass WP:GNG, I prefer to delete this page and merge some but useful informations about this page to its parent company. CSMention269 (talk) 07:15, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Volt Information Sciences has been redirected to Volt Technical Resources, so its not a valid redirect target. scope_creep^Talk 12:31, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Reply - Then merge to Volt Technical Resources. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:03, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Volt Technical Resources is going to be deleted off of Wikipedia. scope_creep^Talk 13:34, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Reply - WP:CRYSTAL. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Draftify to my user space Eamiles (talk) 18:42, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I've just found an independent review report on the company by a indepdenent consultancy, which likely make it notable per long-established consensus. scope_creep^Talk 17:22, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Would this be in addition to the already cited industry analyst reports? One is by Everest Group, and the other is HFS Research; both are independent organizations. Eamiles (talk) 18:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reply - Does this mean that we can close this AFD? --Jax 0677 (talk) 05:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.