Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuntek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:17, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kuntek

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Huh? Epeefleche (talk) 08:10, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Possibly a hoax? Aequo (talk) 08:16, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. At worst this is a hoax, at best this is a dictionary definition of a word in Malay. But Wikipedia is not a dictionary, so either way it doesn't belong in Wikipedia. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 14:06, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Wikipedia is not a dictionary, seems like a hoax, does not cite reliable sources, fails WP:GNG. This probably should have been tagged {{db-hoax}}. —>εϻαdιν ^ΤαΙk _{Ͼδητrιβμτιoης} 15:47, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Someone (with a sense of humor?) did put it in the category hoaxes. It is disturbing not only that this got by whoever checks new articles, but that a number of editors (some senior) edited it as though it was an appropriate article, without tagging it. Leaving it up on wikipedia for 8 months now. Embarrassing.--Epeefleche (talk) 18:39, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Clearly a hoax. Nwlaw63 (talk) 20:49, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—Fascinating. It seems to actually mean something in Maba, but I'll be damned if I can tell what.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 16:48, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.