Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lair (hiding place)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:23, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lair (hiding place)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Classic WP:DICDEF. Tim Song (talk) 22:17, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - dicdef. Could have a decent article about animal's residences in general or for specific species, but this is not even the beginning of such an article. Pseudomonas_(talk) 22:54, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, this is a dictionary definition that is inferior to Wiktionary's entry. An article along the lines that Pseudomonas describes could be encyclopaedic, equally so could one about the bases that superheros/supervilains have (e.g. differing portrayals of them through time). This is neither of these though, and Wiktionary's entry would be a better starting point for them than what is here. Thryduulf (talk) 22:10, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 22:10, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - yes, yes, delete. It uses a dictionary as a ref, so is, like, what was said above about the inferior to a dictionary, Lord Spongefrog, (I am the Czar of all Russias!) 15:57, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.