Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Wade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:06, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nathan Wade

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a WP:BLP1E. No notability outside of that. TarnishedPath^talk 14:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politics, Georgia (U.S. state), and Texas. TarnishedPath^talk 14:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 14:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:BIO1E states The general rule is to cover the event, not the person. Ckfasdf (talk) 16:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Minor coverage Hi Bree! (talk) 18:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC) sock strike[reply]
Delete will second the WP:BLP1E claim here. Allan Nonymous (talk) 19:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BLP and not encyclopedic. We are not X formerly known as Twitter. Bearian (talk) 17:41, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As a perfect example of WP:BLP1E. There's actually not enough to even create a substantial article. AusLondonder (talk) 22:36, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:46, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.