Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pabebe Wave

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The only valid arguments are for delete Courcelles (talk) 00:43, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pabebe Wave

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a minor web phenomenon - little third-party coverage except in social media. Proposed deletion removed by article's creator. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 19:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Wikipedia is not a dictionary. ubiquity (talk) 19:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
keep its all the rage here User:Abdulsaked (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:56, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per WP:NAD, and unreliable sources. Chihciboy (talk) 23:39, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
keep avid aldub supporter here — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reedypays78 (talk • contribs) 13:48, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
keep nothing can stop the aldub fever — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.151.123.12 (talk) 19:21, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- "I like it" is not a valid reason for keeping the article. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 05:45, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above. This seems to be a term limited to the Aldub fandom. A mention in the AlDub article is enough no need for separate article.--Hariboneagle927 (talk) 16:44, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not even worth a redirect as the cultural impact of this "phenomenon" is questionable at this time (I actually think the article for AlDub itself could either be nominated for deletion or merged to the articles on Eat Bulaga and Alden Richards, but that's another story; we don't have an article for KathNiel for example). Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:46, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.