Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reading revolution

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:04, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reading revolution

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A few different publications used the term "reading revolution" in articles, this is true, but this seems like an unwarranted synthesis of those articles. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:24, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It does seem like WP:SYNTH with no reliable source showing unifying notability. Smmurphy^(Talk) 03:32, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - We might redirect to an article on the History of printing, but we should certainly not keep it. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:35, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Agree with all the above. Bondegezou (talk) 13:19, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.