Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefan Dollinger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:26, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan Dollinger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Related discussions on Herbert Schendl and Herbert Koziol. This is a BLP of a non-notable academic, which fails WP:PROF, and is written by a user who has an obvious conflict of interest. See discussion here. Sources are poor primary references. Polyamorph (talk) 06:22, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. See this strange edit by an IP claiming the author of the page was Stefan Dollinger himself [1]. Polyamorph (talk) 06:38, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere _talk 07:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia -related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere _talk 07:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria -related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere _talk 07:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, non-notable academic, fails WP:PROF, way too soon. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 08:35, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:ANYBIO. I don't think his work on the DCHP is sufficient in itself to confer notability on him . I'm not seeing the multiple independent secondary sources about Dollinger required to show notability. Meters (talk) 18:06, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Based on search results from Web of Science he seems like a fine academic, but nothing sufficiently out of the ordinary to satisfy NBIO. Cnilep (talk) 06:50, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Cnilep (talk) 06:54, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.