User talk:Julian Herzog/Archive 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dýrafjörður, Vestfirðir, Islandia, 2014-08-15, DD 036.JPG

Hallo Julian! Sorry, dass ich mich so spät melde, ehrlich gesagt, habe ich dein erstes Kommentar übersehen, ansonsten hätte ich die Nominierung nicht vorzeitig abgeschlossen. Obwohl ich die Nominierung gestern zurückgezogen habe, bin ich neugierig, wie du das Bild verbessern möchtest. Ich habe nicht ganz verstanden, welches Problem du adressieren wolltest, aber uploaded kostet ja nichts. Ist es mehr als eine Erhöhung vom Kontrast? Mit deiner Version als Vorbild könnte ich aus dem RAW File eine neue hochladen und ggf. nominieren. Vielen Dank für deine Mithilfe und meine beste Wünsche für 2015! Poco2 13:49, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Diego, überhaupt kein Problem. Ich werde die Variante als Inspiration hochladen, die Veränderungen beträfen nicht nur den Kontrast, auch wenn das ein Teil davon ist. Leider bin ich über die Feiertage gerade unterwegs und trauen meinem Laptop-Bildschirm nicht weit genug, um meine aktuelle Version hochzuladen. Wenn ich innerhalb der nächsten Woche wieder auf einen vertrauenswürdigen Bildschirm Zugriff habe, landet das Bild auf Commons.
Und natürlich auch beste Wünsche und einen guten Start ins neue Jahr! — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 16:03, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Ok, super, eilt nicht. Sag einfach Bescheid, wenn es soweit ist. Viele Grüsse, Poco2 21:29, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
So, geschafft. Ich hoffe das Ergebnis ist irgendwie hilfreich: File:Dýrafjörður, Vestfirðir, Islandia, 2014-08-15, DD 036 JH edit.JPG — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 20:19, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Copenhagen Opera House 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Ximonic 16:49, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Copenhagen Opera House 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:06, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Copenhagen Opera House 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:23, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Christiansborg Slot Copenhagen 2014 01.jpg

Hi, I have nominated your pic at english FPC. One of the users left an annotation on the pic for a dust spot. If you find time, can you please check and do the needful. Thanks in advance.Nikhil (talk) 14:27, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Fixed, thanks. — Julian H.✈ 14:45, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis auf den Dust spot.

bei diesem Bild Ich habe deine Anmerkung erst verspätet gesehen. --Hubertl (talk) 09:02, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Copenhagen Opera House 2014 05.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Copenhagen Opera House 2014 05.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:02, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thai Airways International Boeing 747-4D7 HS-TGP MUC 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Impressive, very good -- Spurzem 22:45, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emirates Airbus A380-861 A6-EER MUC 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- Spurzem 16:05, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emirates Airbus A380-861 A6-EER MUC 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:07, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emirates Airbus A380-861 A6-EER MUC 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 16:07, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norwegian Air Shuttle Boeing 737-86N LN-NOG MUC 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- Spurzem 10:41, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norwegian Air Shuttle Boeing 737-86N LN-NOG MUC 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 15:37, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Thai Airways International Boeing 747-4D7 HS-TGP MUC 2015 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thai Airways International Boeing 747-4D7 HS-TGP MUC 2015 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:37, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

This is a great idea, thanks you. I will use your template and also will change the older code too when I will visit a gallery.
I already thought about Cascading Style Sheets and I would have like to make also templates for to make much easier the future potential changes (backgrounds, policies....), but I'm not sure if it is possible in Commons. -- Christian Ferrer 19:11, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Singapore Airlines Boeing 777-312ER 9V-SWK MUC 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 15:22, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swiss British Aerospace Avro 146-RJ100 HB-IXS MUC 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 15:22, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:See also

Hi Julian, are you able to write a template which accept a paramater? like in the Template:See also. I used this template until right now, exemple, but it is too obvious and does not harmonize with the current style of galleries so I'll erase or replace if we have better. Can you make a template in the same way as Template:FPGN and we will place the new one above each section, exemple:

  • {{FPSee also|Category:Hymenoptera}}
where Category:Hymenoptera is the parameter and the template will produce the same thing as in Template:FPGN but with writen See also : Category:Hymenoptera


-- Christian Ferrer 11:16, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

I also think that nothing is maybe as well, like in this gallery : Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida, your opinion? -- Christian Ferrer 11:20, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, yes, that's absolutely possible. The only question is what it should look like. I didn't quite understand if you think of one template for both the navigation and the category link, or if you would prefer them to be separate. Together, I guess it could looks somehow like this:
The main question in that case might be if the category template should be used more often than the navigation template, for example with several titles directly beneath each other, without any images in-between. There isn't really a limit to what is possible, it's just a question of what looks good and how much information there should be "around" the images. I do think the pages should focus mainly on the images and therefore not provide too much information that might distract from them - on the other hand, it is possible to make the information less distracting with font sizes, colours and with subtle positioning.
Lastly, of course, it's a question of how much work you/all of us want to put into finding the right categories to link to for all these pages. You have already done an impressive amount in that regard. — Julian H.✈ 11:54, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
  • I was thinking to both template, but I think you're right, one is definitely better. And to keep things visually simpler is better to point that the sections only where there are images, not the titles. Thus the ideal would be to be able to parameterize the current Template:FPGN like this : {{FPGN|Category:Hymenoptera}} or {{FPGN|Hymenoptera}} to have for result your exemple above, keep Hymenoptera (category) or more simply Category:Hymenoptera as you want. It will be good that the template will accept to have no parameters, because some sections have no existing categories, exemple: Category:Towers in Iceland don't exist, thus in the gallery I put no links. It will be a pity to have this result (a See also alone):
  • I summarize, the ideal would be a template to be used with a parameter like this {{FPGN|Category:Hymenoptera}} but which also can be used without parameters like this {{FPGN}} -- Christian Ferrer 13:01, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Ok, yes, that's no problem, I'll do that later or tomorrow. — Julian H.✈ 14:43, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
It should work now, either with {{FPGN|Catname}} or with {{FPGN|cat=Catname}}. — Julian H.✈ 14:57, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Email to MEP

Could you share the text of your email at Commons:Freedom_of_Panorama_2015#Email_campaign? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 02:06, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Unfortunately, that might not be too much help and I don't really want to do it, mainly because the mail was strongly personalised so that it contains a lot of information about me and is not necessarily applicable to someone else. — Julian H.✈ 14:46, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Schaust Du mal bitte

dort vorbei: de:Wikipedia:Offener Brief an die Mitglieder des Europäischen Parlaments zur Erhaltung der Panoramafreiheit --Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 09:29, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Danke, hab ich. — Julian H.✈ 14:45, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Qatar Airways Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner A7-BCO MUC 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful image and good quality -- Spurzem 17:42, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Rescuer of the FoP

A technical barnstar for your victory in the "visible with any browser" wars against members of the EU parliament and their weapons of mass destruction, including non-commercial absolute positions in cascading style sheets.

–Be..anyone (talk) 15:56, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Haha, thanks. :) — Julian H.✈ 16:05, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:46, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Technical Barnstar
Because your reviews in FPC. Thanks The Photographer (talk) 20:27, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ADAC MBB BK-117 D-HMUM Kirchheim 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good--ArildV 07:04, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Rettungshubschrauber-Kategorisierung

Hallo, ich hab gerade einige deiner Rettungshubschrauber-Umkategorisierungen zurückgesetzt. Das Problem ist, dass es keine eindeutige Beziehung zwischen Funkrufnamen und einzelnem Hubschrauber gibt. Es kann sowohl eine Station von vielen Hubschraubern bedient werden als auch ein Hubschrauber mehrere Stationen bedienen. Das heißt wir müssten zum Beispiel D-HLTB sowohl als Christoph 1, Christoph 77, Christoph 32, Christoph Murnau, Christoph Westfalen und und und. Das würde aber eben dazu führen, dass ein Foto mit RTH aus der Münchener Innenstadt plötzlich in der Kategorie Mainz landet, weil dort Christoph 77 stationiert ist. So häufig wie die Luftfahrzeuge heute wechseln gibt es ja schließlich auch immer seltener Stammmaschinen und selbst wenn es Stammmaschinen gibt, ist für die Nachvollziehbarkeit eine getrennte Kategorisierung sinnvoll. Wenn eine Stammmaschine wechselt, würde sonst einfach die Kategorie vom Hubschrauber selbst geändert und damit wären plötzlich alle ehemaligen Fotos vom Hubschrauber in der neuen Kategorie. Deswegen die Reverts. --Indeedous (talk) 18:19, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Alles klar, das hatte ich nicht bedacht. Danke. — Julian H.✈ 18:39, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Danke ...

This edit brought a smile to my face. Daniel Case (talk) 18:50, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! South African Airways Airbus A340-313 ZS-SXE MUC 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:06, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christianshavns Kanal Copenhagen Christianshavn 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:06, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyhavn Copenhagen 2014 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 19:46, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lufthansa Airbus A320-211 D-AIPF MUC 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 19:48, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amalienborg Palace Copenhagen 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It's looking quiet nice, but it needs a small perspective change --Michielverbeek 19:47, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, fixed I think. --Julian Herzog 09:02, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sukhoi Su-35S 07 RED PAS 2013 07 cutout.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and useful --DXR 07:07, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Copenhagen Opera House 2014 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 06:55, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swiss British Aerospace Avro 146-RJ100 HB-IXS MUC 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:34, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tietgenkollegiet Student Residence Copenhagen Ørestad 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:34, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CityJet British Aerospace Avro 146-RJ85 EI-RJC MUC 2015 01 crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen

Hallo Julian Herzog,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Qatar Airways Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner A7-BCA MUC 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Laitche 22:03, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Air China Airbus A330-243 B-6075 MUC 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Laitche 22:03, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bücker Bestmann 181 B-1 D-EKYF OTT 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:23, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bella Sky Comwell Hotel Copenhagen Ørestad 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments die Wolke rechts wirkt komisch, ist aber nunmal so. --Ralf Roletschek 12:23, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HDMS Peder Skram F352 Royal Danish Navy Copenhagen Holmen 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --Pudelek 13:38, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Emirates Airbus A380-861 A6-EER MUC 2015 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Emirates Airbus A380-861 A6-EER MUC 2015 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ABC Boeing 747-8HVF SCD VQ-BRH MUC 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:05, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Help

Hello Julian Herzog. Could you fix the perspective and add noise reduction (moderately) this picture? Just a overwrite. Thanks and nice to meet you! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:39, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I've tried correcting the issues that you mentioned. Especially denoising is tricky though based on a jpeg file, so I'm not sure if I find a reasonable balance there. — Julian H.✈ 09:33, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Opps! Noise reduction is not good in this case. Could you revert the reduction? Well done in general! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:46, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Removed the noise reduction. Cheers, — Julian H.✈ 17:37, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Please, just a crop suggested here and a tilt horizon correction too. I suggest a new uploaded file now. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:39, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I'm actually not too happy with the crop suggestion. Not that I would mind too much if someone does that, but I'm not willing to be the one overwriting it if I don't like it. Sorry. — Julian H.✈ 07:12, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:South African Airways Airbus A340-313 ZS-SXE MUC 2015 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:South African Airways Airbus A340-313 ZS-SXE MUC 2015 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Müllersches Volksbad Munich 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:56, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alte evangelische Kirche Stuttgart Heumaden 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:12, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grabkapelle auf dem Württemberg Stuttgart Rotenberg 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:18, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grabkapelle auf dem Württemberg Stuttgart Rotenberg 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:52, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münchner Residenz Munich 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:52, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dianatempel Munich 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  SupportGood quality. --Шухрат Саъдиев 18:23, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Universitätssternwarte Pfaffenwald Stuttgart-Vaihingen 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Sehr schön! Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:13, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olympiaturm Munich 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:13, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Universitätssternwarte Pfaffenwald Stuttgart-Vaihingen 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grabkapelle auf dem Württemberg Stuttgart Rotenberg 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, though the quality is vanishing at the left and right borders. --Cccefalon 17:05, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grabkapelle auf dem Württemberg Stuttgart Rotenberg 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I propose to clone out the contrail ---Cccefalon 17:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monopteros Englischer Garten Munich 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:22, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 Support gute Qualität --Dh1970 16:55, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deutsches Museum Munich 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good --DXR 13:48, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grabkapelle auf dem Württemberg Stuttgart Rotenberg 2015 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Europa Upper Stage University of Stuttgart 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 07:00, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Europa Upper Stage University of Stuttgart 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:29, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olympiaturm Munich 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 08:00, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Müllersches Volksbad Munich 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice view --Pudelek 08:00, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayerische Staatskanzlei Munich 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:04, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayerische Staatskanzlei Munich 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:04, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grabkapelle auf dem Württemberg Stuttgart Rotenberg 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:17, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

FPC: Broschekhaus und Haus Heuberg 1, Hohe Bleichen 8 (Hamburg-Neustadt).Detail.1.29172.ajb

Hi Julian,

sorry, it's my first FP nomination and I tried to follow Commons:FPC/HowTo, but obviously something went wrong. How can I fix it? --Ajepbah (talk) 12:27, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

It's a bit difficult to fix after the fact and get the timestamp right. I tried, it should be good enough now. I'm not sure how the whole top section could disappear if you used the template. — Julian H.✈ 12:35, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Correction: Ajepbah was faster fixing it. — Julian H.✈ 12:37, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
I forgot the {{subst:FPCnom/Basic |description = SHORT DESCRIPTION |format = portrait }} stuff;-) Sorry for inconveniences ... --Ajepbah (talk) 12:46, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ABC Boeing 747-8HVF SCD VQ-BRH MUC 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Very good. --C messier 11:55, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emirates Airbus A380-861 A6-EDJ MUC 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice shot, QI-quality.for me --J. Lunau 12:32, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! South African Airways Airbus A340-313 ZS-SXE MUC 2015 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice shot, QI-quality.for me --J. Lunau 12:32, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lufthansa Airbus A320-214 D-AIZL MUC 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Well handled motion, good quality. --C messier 12:03, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neues Schloss Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:55, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kunstgebäude Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:13, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW Vierzylinder Tower Munich 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:24, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arkadenhof Altes Schloss Stuttgart 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:41, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arkadenhof Altes Schloss Stuttgart 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 08:01, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlossplatzspringbrunnen Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice and good quality --Pudelek 08:16, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neues Schloss Schlossplatzspringbrunnen Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:26, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neues Schloss Schlossplatzspringbrunnen Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:48, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kunstmuseum Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:48, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlossplatzspringbrunnen Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:34, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neues Schloss Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:51, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlossplatzspringbrunnen Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:51, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neues Schloss Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Definitely good quality. --Laitche 21:12, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neues Schloss Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:58, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neues Schloss Schlossplatzspringbrunnen Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Florstein 10:58, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neues Schloss Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:14, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlossplatzspringbrunnen Jubiläumssäule Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:14, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frederik V statue in Amalienborg Palace Copenhagen 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:12, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Star Alliance Lufthansa Regional Bombardier CRJ-701ER D-ACPQ MUC 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:12, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stiftskirche Stuttgart 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment IMO the image is tilted CW.--XRay 09:45, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, I think it needed more persp. corr., should be better now. --Julian Herzog 13:04, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --XRay 16:48, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Qatar Airways Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner A7-BCA MUC 2015 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:14, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neues Schloss Schlossplatzspringbrunnen Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:39, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Europa Upper Stage University of Stuttgart 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sorry, you're right, QI --Poco a poco 15:49, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NSG Rotwildpark Stuttgart 2014 06 Wald.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:58, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Neues Schloss Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Neues Schloss Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Deutsches Museum Munich 2014 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Deutsches Museum Munich 2014 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kunstmuseum Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:13, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Durchgang Rundbogen Altes Schloss Stuttgart 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:18, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neues Schloss Schlossplatzspringbrunnen Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:18, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neues Schloss Schlossplatzspringbrunnen Jubiläumssäule Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:13, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hackerbrücke Munich 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:29, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Order : Charadriiformes (Waders)

Hello Julian, I want to create a new sub-gallery for birds of the order Charadriiformes as there is near 70 images in this order. However I did not find a satisfactory icon. Do you know if there is such an icon or can you create one? If yes you can inspire you with a bird of the Laridae family because they are recognizable. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:27, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Same concern for Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Order : Carnivora (Carnivores), a good icon of a wolf, lion or tiger would be useful too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:43, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Does this help you with the first category? — Julian H.✈ 09:08, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Yes that's fine, thank you! --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:12, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
@Christian Ferrer: For the second category, I tried a head portrait of a Jaguar (seemed like a typical-looking wild cat to me). I think a full-body silhouette is very hard to tell apart from other mammals at this size. See if that works. — Julian H.✈ 14:26, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Chroicocephalus scopulinus silhouette
    Chroicocephalus scopulinus silhouette
  • Jaguar head icon.
    Jaguar head icon.

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ кыргызча ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hi Julian Herzog, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:09, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Wow, ok, thanks. :) — Julian H.✈ 12:17, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2015 - September - Fountains and wells/Winners

Photo Challenge Winner
Congratulations!

Your picture Neues Schloss Schlossplatzspringbrunnen Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 01.jpg won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Fountains and wells, in September 2015. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Photo Challenge – Third Place
Congratulations!

Your picture Schlossplatzspringbrunnen Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 03.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Fountains and wells, in September 2015. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neues Schloss Schlossplatzspringbrunnen Jubiläumssäule Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:07, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 Comment Nice image, though too blue (see previous QI nomination earlier this month)Is there rain on the image or are the marks something else? Charlesjsharp 12:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Neues Schloss Schlossplatzspringbrunnen Jubiläumssäule Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Neues Schloss Schlossplatzspringbrunnen Jubiläumssäule Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Icon for Pelecaniformes

Hello Julian, can you make a new icon for this bird order please? maybe with a pelican like this one : File:Australian Pelican Kioloa.jpg, it is not a particular choice and you can choose another bird if you wish. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I made this: . Not sure if the details around the head are a good idea, but at the small resolution, that won't be noticeable anyway I think. — Julian H.✈ 19:18, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
It's perfect, I think it will do, thank you very much. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:10, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Neat! I like it. --99of9 (talk) 00:00, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfaffenwaldring 55 57 Universität Stuttgart 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:59, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gastdozentenhaus Universität Stuttgart 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:59, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Allgaier Hütter WE 10 Universität Stuttgart 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 11:53, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grape vines 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Very good! --Hubertl 09:56, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Stitching error Münchner Flughafen

Also, ich habe mal meinen Cache geleert, aber irgendwie ist die linke Doublette des Wagens mit dem Zaun im Kühler immer noch da. Oder täusche ich mich da? --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:12, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

@Cccefalon: Mir liefert der Server auch noch das alte Bild, selbst ohne Cache. An der Auflösung müsste man sehen, wenn man das richtige bekommt. Vielleicht hilft warten, ich weiß nicht. — Julian H.✈ 12:36, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Ja, das hatte mich irritiert; ich hatte die neue Auflösung aber den alten Fehler. Ich warte jetzt mal ne Weile. Wenn der stitching Fehler dann weg ist, setze ich das Bild direkt zurück auf Promotion. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:45, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
@Cccefalon: Mit hard reload bekomme ich jetzt die richtige Datei, mit nur einem SUV. — Julian H.✈ 13:12, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
I got now also the correct version on my screen. Thanks for removing; I changed back to "PromotioN". --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 14:27, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Munich airport winter panorama 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:18, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
I disagree: There is one stitching ghost (the left car of the two cars; I made an annotation). --Cccefalon 11:27, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
I might have fixed that. Julian Herzog 11:56, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Alright, the ghost disappeared! --Cccefalon 14:23, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz Werk Untertürkheim Neckarpark Stuttgart 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:18, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EgyptAir Boeing 737-866 SU-GCM MUC 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:18, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thai Airways International Boeing 747-4D7 HS-TGX MUC 2015 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:45, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raumfahrtzentrum Baden-Württemberg Universität Stuttgart 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 14:17, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

— Julian H.✈ 17:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emirates Airbus A380-861 A6-EDJ MUC 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 22:52, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Air China Airbus A330-243 B-6075 MUC 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I would have liked to see the aircraft complete. --Medium69 15:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
:Sorry, I'd welcome a second opinion. Showing only the forward part of the aircraft is clearly intentional here, the alternative exists. I think this has value and meets the guidelines. --Julian Herzog 21:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)  Support QI is not VI Ezarate 23:24, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
 Support Ok for me. --Medium69 01:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Danke für Deine Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2015!

belegte mit diesem Bild den

im Wettbewerb

Begründung: Die Wirkung des Bildes entsteht durch die Lichtstimmung der blauen Stunde und den Kontrast zwischen statischer Straßenbrücke und eingefangener Bewegung der Züge.

belegte mit diesem Bild den

im Wettbewerb

belegte mit diesem Bild den

im Wettbewerb

belegte mit diesem Bild den

im Wettbewerb

belegte mit diesem Bild den

im Wettbewerb

Hallo Julian!

Vielen Dank, dass Du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 mitgemacht und Deine Fotos von Kulturdenkmalen mit der ganzen Welt geteilt hast! Weltweit wurden im Rahmen des Wettbewerbs über 230.000 Bilder hochgeladen. 38.953 davon stammen allein aus Deutschland, wo sich 866 Teilnehmer beteiligt haben.
Hier findest Du weitere statistische Informationen zu den Ergebnissen von Wiki Loves Monuments 2015.

Und so geht’s jetzt mit dem Wettbewerb weiter:

  • Die WLM-Vorjury alle im Rahmen des Wettbewerbs hochgeladenen Bilder gesichtet und bewertet.
  • Vom 16. bis 18. Oktober tagte die Hauptjury in Fulda und legte auf Basis der Vorjury-Bewertungen die Platzierung der besten Aufnahmen fest. In der darauf folgenden Woche wurden dann die besten Bilder des Wettbewerbs und natürlich die Preisträger veröffentlicht.
  • Für die Vergabe unserer tollen WLM-Preise wird dann Wikimedia Deutschland in den Wochen bis Weihnachten nach und nach alle Preisträger anschreiben und bitten, sich einen Preis aus unserem Sachpreispool auszusuchen. Bitte sorge daher dafür, dass Du in Deinen Account-Einstellungen Deine E-Mail-Adresse hinterlegt hast und auf ggf. dort ankommende Mails innerhalb von höchstens einer Woche antwortest.

Auch wenn der diesjährige Wettbewerb jetzt vorbei ist, möchten wir Dich einladen, auch weiterhin Fotos hochzuladen und bei der Pflege von Wikipedia-Artikeln und Listen zu helfen. Wikipedia und Wikimedia Commons leben durch Menschen wie Dich, die ehrenamtlich helfen, freie Inhalte zu erstellen und für alle zugänglich zu machen. Weitere Informationen dazu, wie genau Du an der Wikipedia mitarbeiten kannst, findest Du in unserem Tutorial, und wenn Du Dir dabei eine persönliche Unterstützung wünschst, kannst Du Dich einfach an unser Mentorenprogramm wenden.

Viel Glück für den Wettbewerb und viel Spaß bei der weiteren Mitarbeit in der Wikipedia und hier auf Commons wünscht Dir das Wiki Loves Monuments Team Deutschland 2015 (Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 20:06, 10 December 2015 (UTC))

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Schlossplatzspringbrunnen Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schlossplatzspringbrunnen Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Wonderful holidays

Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! --Tremonist (talk) 15:47, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, I also wish you some nice holidays! — Julian H.✈ 17:25, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! ***

* * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * *
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
* Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
* Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
* ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
* Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:15, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Icons?

*** Above all, I wish you very good festivities end years! ***
When you will have the time can you create two icons please? one for Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Order : Asparagales (exemples: 1 or 2) and one for Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Order : Asterales (exemples: 3 or 4).
Take the time you want. Warm regards, --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:49, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Choices for the second one: (a bit nicer, really bad license) or (much better license, not quite as nice). — Julian H.✈ 11:25, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
@Christian Ferrer: As for the first one, maybe try this one: . If it's too narrow and undistinctive to be recognizable, I can try a species with a less narrow silhouette. — Julian H.✈ 12:57, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Thank you, I fully agree with all that you said, at small size looks a bit like a pine tree, maybe this kind of flower will be more recognizable. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:13, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
@Christian Ferrer: Voilà: . — Julian H.✈ 08:35, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Julian_Herzog/Archive_2015&oldid=238455735"