User talk:MGA73/Archive 58

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Five acounts



  • The 15 images are fine to review in Category:Files from 185802208@N07 Flickr stream since the source flickr account WORT NEWS says "We have no staff photographer, but our news staff updates photographs here. Photos are free for use, with attribution" Today their images are ARR but not in the past.


Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Great work! --MGA73 (talk) 20:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)


  • These images in Category:Files from 61981636@N06 Flickr stream are certainly own work by Mauro Rubem who (google translate says from his flickr profile) is a "Former State Deputy, dental surgeon, public health specialist and trade unionist. He is a member of the Workers' Party and president of the Central Única dos Trabalhadores de Goiás. He was a councilor in Goiânia, Brazil and elected state deputy three times." All his images were taken by a Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XSi camera and some images like the one below are watermarked with his own name:
  • File:Marcha das Vadias - 52º CONUNE (5952265443).jpg




  • These images in Category:Files from 192105714@N06 Flickr stream come from a now deleted flickr account named shashin micro 43 in Japan but this appears to be certainly legitimate work. Internet Wayback did archive this account so it existed. There are 2 cameras used, both Panasonic models and most were taken by a Panasonic DMC-G7 camera. It is most likely own work from the consistency of the photos. At least they are high resolution images.


  • The many images in Category:Files from 186544682@N04 Flickr stream are clearly own work by Justin J. Kiecker who says "I'm a writer in german language (still working on to improve my skills in English). Beside that I'm activist and amateur photographer. I like to share my pictures of events and protests on this account." His images are full of protests.




  • The images in Category:Files from 61591234@N05 Flickr stream were taken with either a HTC PC36100 or a Canon EX-Z750 camera by Dave Hass57 This person stopped uploading pictures to flickr after April 2018 but the photos are still licensed freely. The images are consistently of cars and are likely own work.



Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:49, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

I will have a look. If you click this link you can see who uploaded the files. It might be worth passing all uploads by the trusted users as you suggested earlier. --MGA73 (talk) 06:22, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment: Here is another set of Category:Files from 158350039@N03 Flickr stream that is likely own work by K Bahr In the cosmic photos, he says he took them from his backyard. In his flickr profile, he implies that he suffered a stroke I think and cannot move far anymore. As for your suggestions about the uploader, this is a tricky question. Some uploaders such as Sentinel user have been banned or blocked for sockpuppetry or abusive comments but the images they uploaded are actually legitimate. Life is complicated. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:44, 13 April 2024 (UTC)






The 50 images in Category:Files from 186395973@N06 Flickr stream are OK to review from the Architecture of Dublin I ordered a new review on File:Drumcondra House (2023).jpg and the flickrbot passed the image here: File:Drumcondra House (2023).jpg




PS: Most of the other images come from flickr accounts with 2, 3, 5 or 7 images. If you have time, please feel free to pass those which are clearly own work. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:12, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

re Yeah no more big accounts. I think when the categories in Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review - pending bot review are fixed we should scan the category for copyvios and then ask the Flickrreview bot to do new reviews. Then the bot will either review or if the flickr user is bad it will mark them. --MGA73 (talk) 19:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Comment

Thanks for the link. There are now 4868 images in the category needing review...as long as Ooligan does not upload any new PDM images as cc0.







  • The images in Category:Files from 95929490@N06 Flickr stream are all PD today. They depict paintings by Perugino (16th century), Renoir who died in 1919, Umberton Boccioni who died in 1916, etc from the flickr account of Art Gallery ErgsArt - by ErgSap. The Sweat of the Brow doctrine or reproduction of works now in the public domain do not carry copyright (unless the work is totally original which is not the case here) in the USA, UK or EU. So, the images can all be passed by your bot.


  • The images in Category:Files from 125103679@N05 Flickr stream can be passed since they all use the same Nikon D5 camera. They come from the account of 劉雙語 The uploader, Solomon203, seems reliable in my opinion. He uploaded some images that were not reviewed by flickr in time before they were deleted on flickr but I restored the flickrlink with the Wayback machine in some cases and the license and image was always right. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC)




Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)


New paragraph

Hello Leoboudv! I just had my bot put the new uploads in categories by flickr user. Once the categories in Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review - pending bot review are checked I suggest that you scan for possibly bad files. If you find some you can either nominate them for deletion or put the categories in Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review - pending bot review - not ok. If in doubt just park them in the "not okay"-category for later check. Once you think the most likely copyvios are nominated for deletion or parked in the "not ok"-category I can ask the Flickrreview bot to do a new review of all the files and have it skip the files in the "not ok"-category. --MGA73 (talk) 12:56, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

I looked at the files in Category:Files from 50256734@N05 Flickr stream. I nominated some for deletion and passed a few other photos (see Category:Files from Mike Lidgley Flickr stream). --MGA73 (talk) 19:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
I also checked a few photos from Category:Files from 93850985@N02 Flickr stream and besides the files you noticed by "Bridget Nelson" I also noticed that some files like File:Bishops Herzog and Bena - Holy Trinity Syracuse.jpg says "Raymond's Photography". --MGA73 (talk) 19:15, 14 April 2024 (UTC)


























  • I may be away to rest as I am really tired especially after dealing with the Ronald Furet flickrwashing account but I believe most PDM flickr accounts have 1, 2 or 3 images and are very hard to review except by hand. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Yes sadly it takes time to review the smaller accounts. I think if there are less than 10 files in a category it might be just as fast to review manually.
I think that once the big categories are reviewed (and the most likely copyvios are marked for deletion) we should ask the Flickrreview bot to review the rest.
And it looks like a very nice area :-) --MGA73 (talk) 18:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

*Just 8 comments:



Thirdly, the many images in Category:Files from 51500028@N08 Flickr stream were taken by a Sony ILCE-6000 camera at the same time and likely by andrew.bedwin the flickr account owner. They should be passed.


Fourthly, these mostly low quality images in Category:Files from 126816719@N03 Flickr stream are likely own work by Jon Brinn who stopped uploading pictures to his flickr account in 2018. He takes color and black and white photos as this shows. I think they should be passed.


Fifthly, all these mostly low quality images in Category:Files from 68107928@N08 Flickr stream are own work by gareth patterson They were all taken by a Nikon D3100 camera and should be passed. This flickr user has taken black and white photos in his flickr photostream.


Sixthly, the images in Category:Files from 23408922@N07 Flickr stream are almost certainly own work by Pete who even says in his flickr profile: "Unless my photos are 'all rights reserved' (of which I've got very few) then I don't mind if you don't credit me when you use it, PROVIDING you either Flickrmail me or leave a comment to say where it is that it's been used." This implies that he is OK with the use of his freely licensed images and know copyright. Finally, I ordered a review on one of his images here: File:Blue Skies (29803486328).jpg and the flickrbot passed it. His images should be passed.


Seventh, the 9 images in Category:Files from 120757847@N06 Flickr stream must be own work and should be passed since they show the same high image quality and subject composition and were all taken by a Canon EOS 5D Mark II or III or Canon EOS R6 camera. The flickr account owner has now deleted the images but they were reviewed as PDM by the flickr review bot.





@Leoboudv: I created a few new categories so there are now 18 categories to check. So we can soon do a mass request to the bot to check the files. --MGA73 (talk) 14:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC)