User talk:Orem

Pierwsze kroki - poradnik Nasz poradnik pierwsze kroki i FAQ pomogą Ci po rejestracji. Wyjaśnią, jak dostosować interfejs (np. język), jak załadować pliki i opiszą podstawowe zasady licencjonowania. Nie musisz posiadać technicznych umiejętności, by wnieść swój wkład. To wiki – wszystko tu jest naprawdę proste. Uzyskanie pomocy Więcej informacji dostępnych jest na Portalu wikipedystów. Pytania możesz zadawać w Barze lub na kanale IRC – #wikipedia-pl. Możesz także skontaktować się z administratorem na jego stronie dyskusji. Jeśli masz określone pytanie o prawa autorskie, spytaj na Commons talk:Licensing.		Dodatki, rady i triki Na swoją stronę użytkownika wstaw tabelę Babel, by inni wiedzieli w jakich językach mówisz oraz dodaj informacje o swoich graficznych umiejętnościach. Załadowane przez siebie pliki znajdziesz w swojej Galerii. Proszę podpisuj się na stronach dyskusji używając czterech tyld: ~~~~. Używaj narzędzia CommonSense, by znaleźć dobre kategorie dla Twoich plików (wtedy także i inni je odnajdą!). Aby stworzyć link do strony z grafiką, wpisz: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], co da: Image:Foo.jpg. Jeśli kopiujesz pliki z innego projektu, upewnij się, że użyłeś CommonsHelper. Popełniłeś błąd? Chcesz usunąć lub przenieść plik? Po prostu załaduj plik ponownie i oznacz stary w ten sposób: {{bad name|Poprawna nazwa}}. Więcej informacji uzyskasz czytając Deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Czy chciałbyś dać odpowiedź zwrotną na tę wiadomość?)

-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 13:02, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hej w nazwach grafik herbó i flag dla miejscowości dawaj ich nazwy z dużej litery i z plliterkami :)

Tak będzie lepiej - jeżeli możesz, to załaduj jeszcze raz poprzednio załadowane grafiki z poprawionymi nazwami :)

Pozdrawiam --WarX 18:13, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

W sumie jest jakiś szablon, który do tego służy ... możesz użyć {{redundant|:image:nazwa_nowego_pliku}}. W każdym razie napisz mi co trzeba posprzątać, to posprzątam :) --WarX 11:24, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1. Tak możesz zmienić licencje, ponieważ mogłeś nie wiedzieć co robisz dając PD
2. GNU General Public License to GPL, a nie GFDL
3. Tak można - idea herbu jest PD, ale twoja jej realizacja może być na dowolnej licencji (w sumie zamiast polishsymbol, możesz dać {insignia})

Pozdrawiam --WarX 18:52, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe ein bot :P Powiedz mi co, a ci to przebotuje :P

Pozdro--WarX 20:37, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

zapomniałem obciach jakich mało :( Dobrze, że się upomniałeś - już się robi (w trakcie) --WarX 19:38, 19 June 2006 (UTC) Czołem. Nie uważasz że wypadałoby podać autora baretek, które konwertujesz na svg? Nie to żebym się czepiał, ale... Halibutt 16:44, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Akurat w tym wypadku chodziło mi o baretki zrobione - najwyrażniej, sądząc po kolorach, na podstawie mojej roboty wgranej na wiki, a nie na podstawie tej strony - chyba że i oni ich używają. To nic strasznego, nawet Watfor ich używa bez podania źródła (choć wymaga tego licencja, ale co tam). Oczywiście zapewne ich dokładny wygląd jest regulowany przez odpowiednie dokumenty, ale ja nie miałem do nich dostępu, stąd na przykład moje VM mają taki fajny kolor - zwyczajnie użyłem tego, który znalazłem w sieci na jakimś zdjęciu - zakropliłem i voila.

Nie jest to może jakieś rażące naruszenie praw autorskich, ale na pewno byłoby miło gdybyś na przyszłość nie zapominał o takich sprawach. Zwłaszcza jeśli grafika pochodzi z wikipedii, a więc ustalenie żródła i autora nie jest trudne. Halibutt

Jaśli uważasz, że Twoja wersja herbu jest bardziej podobna do oryginalnego (cokolwiek by to nie znaczyło) to załaduj go jako osobny plik (np. POL_Miasto_COA_1.svg lub POL_Miasto_COA_alt.svg). Potem możesz taki plik podmienić w Wiki. Ładowanie nowej wersji plików to funkcja służąca do ładowania poprawionego pliku zrobionego na podstawie pliku poprzedniego, a nie zamiany na plik zupełnie inny. Takie działanie jest niezgodne z zasadami Wikimedia Commons. Herby zgodne z blazonem to poprawne herby. A BIP nie jest wortalem heraldycznym... --Shazz 05:50, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okej . Roman 92 ^talk 12:17, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ej no - przecież skasowałem te dwie grafiki, bota zapuszczę wieczorem, bo teraz muszę wyjść z domu :) --WarX 08:32, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Popsułem Ci opisy :].

Zobacz:

• Image:Fortepian - mechanizm wiedeński.svg#Full description
• Image:Fortepian - mechanizm angielski.svg#Full description

Pozdrowienia/Regards, Nux (talk) 01:00, 31 August 2006 (UTC).[reply]

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All the featured pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As the creator of one or more images nominated for the election we invite you to participate in the event. Alvesgaspar 11:56, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interested in honouring the best of the best? Vote now in the Commons Picture of the Year competition 2006 Voting to select the finalists is open until 14th February. Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 日本語 | Nederlands | português | svenska | 中文（简体） | 中文（繁體） | +/−

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All Featured Pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As a past contributor to Featured Pictures, we invite you to participate in the competition (but please wait until tomorrow to vote). --MichaelMaggs 21:55, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wielkie dzięki za ten herb. WarX miał rację, że jesteś zajebisty w robieniu takich grafik. Pietras1988 21:01, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
I just wanted to let you know that {{English}}, {{Deutsch}}, {{Polski}}, {{Français}} and so on are now deprecated and should not be used any more.
You can use {{en|Your English text}}, {{de|your Deutsch text}}, {{pl|your Polish text}}, {{fr|your French text}}, etc. instead :)
Best regards,
-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 13:02, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
Have you seen that you have two new pictures featured? Congratulations! Is it possible for you to add a full english description to them? I translate featured pictures descriptions from English to French and vice versa but I don't read Polish... Sorry. Berru 20:34, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cześć. Na podstawie jakiego obrazu robiłeś Image:POL Czaplinek COA.svg ? Czy to autentyczny herb Czaplinka ? --JDavid 23:29, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To ja znalazłem obowiązujący wzór (w dużej roździałce) i przekazałem go Poznaniakowi. Wygooglałem starszą wersję herbu, ale ona była z prawie całą złotą czaplą bez konturów. Więc ten wzór na podst. którego opracowałeś twoją wersję jest naprawdę ciekawostką. Dlatego też napisałem do Ciebie czy masz może jakieś informacje. Bo po prostu chciałem coś dodać do art. pl:herb Czaplinka, ale jak widać herb z czarną czaplą raczej nie jest autentyczny. --JDavid 16:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm writing to let you know that an image of yours that became a Commons Featured Picture during 2007 is now part of the 2007 Picture of the Year competition. If you have > 200 edits you are welcome to vote too. Thanks for contributing your valuable work and good luck. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:27, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

---

Hello, Orem!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 22:12, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Image:PRU Roter Adlerorden BAR.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Waga torsyjna.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leyo 15:20, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:POL_gmina_Międzyrzec_Podlaski_COA.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

83.18.73.146 11:47, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amputation retractor.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:32, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sengstaken-Blakemore tube numbered.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:32, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gigli saw.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:32, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deschamps needle.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jovianeye 01:57, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. odder (talk) 06:08, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Intussusception EN.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:17, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Orem,

We are interested in using one of your images for publication for a case report being submitted to a journal. The image we are interested in is: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Musculi_colli_omohyoideus.svg - your omohyoid image. Would you be willing to help us out? Please send me a message if you are willing. Thank you.

Al88Can

Hello Orem,

Thank you kindly! Your pictures (the others on your page as well) are excellent! I will confirm with the journal that this is ok, and I will most likely have to send you a form. We are more than happy to send our publication when it is published by the journal. You can message me at al@velocitysportsmed.com

AL.

Hello Orem,

Can I send you a journal permission form to obtain permission to use your omohyoid figure? You can message me at alee1@cmcc.ca if you like and I can send it to you. Thank you for your assistance with our case report!

AL

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herb Rzeczypospolitej Obojga Narodow.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Eatcha 04:20, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ventriculus.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

90.189.251.152 09:38, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you replace the image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Edward_Low_Flag.svg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/a/ad/20200111203158%21Edward_Low_Flag.svg with this version? https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/2/29/20241213024024%21Edward_Low_Red_Skeleton_Flag.svg That way the red skeleton won't look as blurry like in the first one. RootOfAllLight (talk) 08:57, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen that you re-uploaded the original file (File:Edward Low Flag.svg) a few times, so feel free to upload the version you proposed as better once more :)

You may also add the info about contribution in editing the file, next to info about my autorship. I think this way it will be fair for you.

Best regars, Orem (talk) 10:23, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]