 | Nicolinas is currently a Culture, sociology and psychology good article nominee. Nominated by V.B.Speranza (talk) at 17:59, 28 September 2024 (UTC) Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.) Short description: Series of festivities celebrating Saint Nicholas that occur in Guimarães, Portugal |
 | Nicolinas was nominated as a Philosophy and religion good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (February 11, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by AirshipJungleman29 talk 18:16, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- ... that the Nicolinas, a traditional set of festivities from the Portuguese city of Guimarães, are celebrated in honor of Saint Nicholas? Source: [1]
- Reviewed:
Created by V.B.Speranza (talk). Self-nominated at 01:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Nicolinas; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Sorry, I know you put a lot of work into this, but I'm leaning firmly towards oppose. There are significant WP:NPOV and slight WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH issues with the article (please read both of these links carefully). Quotes like "vibrant assembly", "reimagined the nomenclature", "With the passage of time, it became apparent that one day was not enough to celebrate St. Nicholas", and "People of all ages come together to joyously celebrate" are overly flowery, and sometimes unsourced.
- It's not just in a few places, it's in almost every paragraph of the article. Addressing these issues would involve a significant rewrite, and also a change in your writing style entirely, which is not easy. I recommend the nomination be closed. I see it's also nominated for good article; as a heads up, reviewers will likely have the same feedback, and possibly quick fail it. Consider asking someone for tips on how to rework it, then renominating for good article, then doing a DYK after it passes. Hope this feedback is helpful, all the best. toobigtokale (talk) 04:07, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- For this and future articles, some style links you should read:
- Hope these are helpful. toobigtokale (talk) 04:12, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Nicolinas/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: A. Parrot (talk · contribs) 07:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
I'm quick-failing this article, as it has tags on it (for promotional and fannish language) that are pretty clearly valid. Moreover, the nominator has done nothing to address these problems since the tags were added ten days ago, despite being warned by User:Toobigtokale that the nomination could fail if the article did not improve. A. Parrot (talk) 07:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)