Talk:Talent agent
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
The redirect Talent scouting for Hollywood has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 20 § Talent scouting for Hollywood until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 18:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Proposed split
editI am proposing to split Talent agency (currently a redirect to this page) into a separate article. It's clearly a distinct topic, and the redirect has many many incoming links as well as a distinct category (Category:Talent agencies vs. Category:Talent agents). A split seems like a no-brainer to me, but I want to open a discussion in case any editors have concerns about how it would be implemented. Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 21:21, 19 October 2024 (UTC)