This article is related to the Harold B. Lee Library holdings. Learn more about this collaborative project to improve coverage related to the BYU library's holdings, and how you can help here.Harold B. Lee LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/Harold B. Lee LibraryTemplate:WikiProject Harold B. Lee LibraryHarold B. Lee Library-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 08:56, December 15, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
Thanks for the ping! I no longer have time to work articles towards FA status in terms of the best way I can use my time to benefit articles, editors, or the encyclopedia. I do, though, appreciate your work, so if there is any way I can help you as you get closer to FAC, please do ping me. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:33, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
I've never been successful in getting a page to FA, but I would be interested in figuring out how to do so! I have some other projects I'm working on, but I could dedicate a few hours a week. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 18:48, 1 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
I see on quick glance:
attention to wikilinking wil be needed, but that sort of work is best left 'til last (text may move, which changes which is the first occurrence of a linked article)
MOS:LQ review needed, sample, and "ability to empathize."
History.com not a high-quality source, flagged by Headbomb's script.
There is a very long list of Further reading; FAC reviewers will ask what the criteria is for inclusion, and why those weren't used as sources.
A list of External links that long will need justification for a Featured article (supposed to already be comprehensive, see WP:EL and WP:ELNO)
Nihonjoe, didn't we get a lot of grief for the list of notable internees at Manzanar? I could be misremembering ... even if you keep them all, a list is not good, should be prose, see how I did Lewy_body_dementias#Notable_individuals
I corrected the quotes to follow MOS:LQ, replaced the history.com source, and removed Further Reading sources that are already mentioned in the text. WP:EL says that findingaid links should be considered for the external links list. I consider them primary sources that I would not use as sources for the page, since Wikipedia prefers secondary sources. What do you think SandyGeorgia? Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 21:51, 2 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
I have never before heard of findingaids (feeling stupid). But by the time the article is featured, it should be comprehensive, so anything worth listing there will theoretically be used as a source, and not needed there, particularly as they related to individual accounts. I would feel better about some of those (related to individuals) being on that person's page, rather than this page (presuming they meet notability, otherwise we wouldn't be adding their link anyway). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:03, 2 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Don't feel stupid--findingaids are a bit of a specialized catalog record that only specialized researchers need to use. I've found several FAs that have links to the subject's personal writings. Van Gough had an external link to his letters at the time it was an FA. P.G. Wodehouse also had links to his public domain works and two different Wodehouse societies, both of which are involved in archival preservation of Wodehouse's works. However, I feel like this argument is a little weak, because I didn't find an FA with findingaid links (but my search was limited to a few pages). Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 19:25, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Would it help to make a separate "archival collections" section? I checked, and WP:EL is not actually part of the "style guidelines" that FA articles need to comply with. It is a content guideline and not mentioned in the FA criteria. However, I understand that there are probably a lot of traditions with FA reviewing that go beyond the actual, written criteria. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 19:25, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Maybe one was after it got GA status? That's one of the things it can be listed for. I found only the one you mentioned, which was for GA. That seems to be the only entry, though. And it's definitely weird that it had the same DYK wording both times. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 19:44, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
