Talk:USS Badger (FF-1071)
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Ospalh in topic Too much detail
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the USS Badger (FF-1071) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
Too much detail
editI've added an 'excessive amount of intricate detail' note to the article. What I mean is things like
Later that day, the ship headed back to Danang to have her five-inch (127 mm) gun barrel replaced by the repair ship USS Hector (AR-7).
Normal west coast operations out of Long Beach occupied her time until 9 July, the day she got underway for her new home port, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. The warship made the voyage in six days, entering Pearl on 14 July.
The whole article is down to this level of detail. Anybody interested in that much detail should go read the source. I think the Wikipedia article should be much more concise.--ospalh (talk) 07:36, 8 May 2009 (UTC)