Userboxes
22YThis Wikipedian was born on 30 August 2002 and is 22 years, 3 months, and 19 days old.
This user has publicly declared that he has a conflict of interest regarding the Wikipedia article Cincinnati Christian Schools.
This user is a Monty Python fan.
This user demands a shrubbery! Ni!
TF2This user's sentry is being sapped!!
Weird Al YankovicThis user is both
White & Nerdy
D:<Nothing annoys this user more than when a teacher says that Wikipedia isn't reliable and that anybody can enter anything completely untrue that'll stay.
This user is a recent changes patroller with Twinkle!
This user hates all Apple devices.
This user loves A&W Root Beer
Like Winston Churchill, this user is in good health because they don't practice any sport.
ADHDThis user has ADHD.
This user lives in the U.S. State of Ohio.
enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.
de-1Dieser Benutzer hat grundlegende Deutschkenntnisse.
This user prefers PC.
This user contributes using a
MacBook Air.
This user built his own PC.
nThis user uses a nVidia GTX 1050 Ti graphics card in his PC.
cvg-4This user is an expert gamer.
XCOM This user's motto is VIGILO•CONFIDO
This user is a member of
WikiProject Military history.
This user plays the Halo series.

I am Jebcubed, a person who likes to revert vandalism. Not only do I edit Wikipedia, I also edit Halopedia too!

Why I do this

edit

My main reasons for doing this come from the fact that schools teach that Wikipedia isn't a reliable source. I resolved to help make it reliable by stopping people from vandalizing it.

Methodology

edit

I will revert an edit if:

  • It is obviously vandalism
  • I know enough about the page itself to know that the edit adds false information
  • Random sections are removed without explanation

I won't touch a page if the edit doesn't immediately strike me as vandalism and I lack the knowledge to know if the addition is true or not.

Personal Views

edit

I know that Wikipedia is supposed to allow all people to edit, but I do tend to wish that all IP editors would have their edits treated as Pending review. I also think that any page whose topic matter is the subject of current controversy should be semi-protected until the controversy dies down.