Crzycheetah

Hi Crzycheetah. You commented at the above FLC a few days ago. I've addressed your concerns, and the page formatting has been corrected. Best, Matthewedwards :  Chat  04:06, 29 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review, let me know if there's anything more to be done.Suede67 (talk) 03:31, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I just thought I'd give you a heads up that I made a change to the page. I switched the template I used {{IIHFteams}} so that it only includes blue links, and doesn't link everything else. However, the best part that if someone created a new page right now, it would automatically be linked. What so you think? -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 23:53, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review and I fixed all of your concerns except 1 or 2 that I need some additional input on. Could you please swing back by and take a look. Thanks again.--Kumioko (talk) 13:22, 16 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Did you read the note on the bottom of the page? I might seek reassessment after the issue is addressed. Leave Message ,Yellow Evan home , Sandbox

Do you still think it should be merged? Dabomb87 (talk) 15:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

I never thought about merging the Canadian list. I just think the layout of these number-one lists needs to be tweaked a little. The table, for example, is way longer than needed.--Crzycheetah 16:46, 24 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Could you comment there please? It's lacking reviews, and if you could improve the table that would be great. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:36, 2 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've added this user right to your account because, well, it seemed silly for you not to have it with your record of article and category creation. Regards, Bencherlite^Talk 02:25, 1 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Crzycheetah. I saw one of your comments at the NHL draft list regarding sourcing from just primary sources. While I was travelling, the following lists were promoted using just primary sources:

• List of Nobel laureates in Physics
• List of Nobel laureates in Chemistry
• List of Nobel laureates in Literature
• List of Nobel Peace Prize laureates
• List of Nobel laureates in Physiology or Medicine
• List of Nobel laureates in Economics
• List of female Nobel laureates

Would you care to nominate these lists for demotion? The Rambling Man (talk) 11:28, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

See my reply at Matthewedwards (talk · contribs) talk page. I do think that there might be the possibility of using third-party sources in the female list, as there might be analysis/coverage over gender disparities, etc. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:14, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

See my continuing discussion there too. Regardless of the merits of one particular list, this whole subject needs proper discussion. The Rambling Man (talk) 23:47, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Crzycheetah, your merger of the tables has resulted in the loss of information about the ends and also the various "see also" links. There appears to be missing detail in the footnotes. I think I'm going to need to revert it back to the version before the one you modified and then merge it more carefully so as to not lose useful information. And, somewhat unfortunately, the list does not actually sort by date, as it was supposed to. Just wanted to let you know. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:01, 25 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! I was actually thinking about nominating it after I make a few small changes, so hopefully it will be a FL someday. --TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 19:23, 25 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

PS - Do you intend to strike that last point as resolved? -- Sk8er5000 (talk) 23:38, 25 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Can I you take a look at List of number-one Billboard Top Latin Albums from the 1990s and its FLC? Specifically, look at the formatting of the general reference; is it an acceptable way to present the references? Dabomb87 (talk) 15:01, 27 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

• • • Thank you for your imput on the List of number-one Billboard Top Latin Albums from the 1990s. Jaespinoza (talk) 19:55, 1 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

What do you think about the format of the tables in the above timeline. I think it could be vastly improved, but I'm not sure how. Feedback is welcome at Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Timeline of Macintosh models/archive1. Dabomb87 (talk) 19:11, 3 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Oh, and Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Marine Corps Brevet Medal/archive1 needs revisiting, since most of the redlinks have been blued. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 03:30, 4 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

We don't link dates any more per WP:MOSNUM. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 15:31, 12 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I know, I just traveled back in time, I guess.--Crzycheetah 01:31, 13 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Also, Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of Minnesota Vikings seasons/archive1 needs a revisit. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 22:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks!--Crzycheetah 01:31, 13 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hey, nice work [1]. I was thinking there's a potential WP:Did you know? editor's reward in waiting if we can expand the article to 15000 bytes (double the length it is now) by Sep 3rd to make it eligible for DYK (the rule is 5x expansion in five days). It's going well so far, but I could use a bit of help. Interested? 85.94.186.91 (talk) 19:23, 1 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I know you've had reservations about these type of list before; can you comment on this one? See Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Ricky Ponting/archive1. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:30, 3 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks for your comments. I suggest keeping List of international cricket centuries by Ricky Ponting and then creating Achievements of Ricky Ponting for all other records like at Achievements of Sachin Tendulkar. Then List of Test awards for Ricky Ponting could be merged into Achievements of Ricky Ponting along with other jargon. It would be a lot easier to do this. Regards, Aaroncrick (talk) 04:15, 3 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Virender Sehwag/archive2 was renominated. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:30, 8 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Crzycheetah! I'm just dropping by to let you know of the FLRC delegate election that begins on Tuesday. You may run in the election by following the instructions on the page. If you don't wish to run, please come and vote sometime next week! The election starts Tuesday and ends Saturday. For more information, check out the opening section of the page. Cheers, iMatthew ^talk at 19:37, 12 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

The nomination has been restarted so that consensus for promotion or archival can emerge. Please update your stance on the article and be sure to add/update any comments you may have. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 04:24, 21 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

See here. Cheeers, Dabomb87 (talk) 01:47, 25 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the move, but it's not necessary to move an archived featured list candidate / removal candidate page when the article is moved. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:18, 7 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

I actually want to nominate it for the removal; that's why so many moves have been made. I'll nominate it in about 10 minutes.--Cheetah (talk) 04:20, 7 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi. You have commented on a previous FLC for this list, so a revisit for the current FLC would be appreciated. Regards, Dabomb87 (talk) 03:07, 7 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Also, does Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of members of the Baseball Hall of Fame/archive1 look good to go? Dabomb87 (talk) 23:55, 27 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks you have informed the project page and please drop messages to involved users. I am having my OJT so I really don't have enough time to respond to the concerns raised at FLRC. Thanks Cheetah. --Efe (talk) 11:30, 12 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Glad to see some activity from your end. Hope you enjoyed the holiday season. Cheers, and happy New Year, Dabomb87 (talk) 17:28, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

One thing: can you comment at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of forty-plus point games by Kobe Bryant/archive1 on whether the cut-off point is appropriate? Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 23:39, 19 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Hello Crzycheetah! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 6 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Marcus Douthit - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:23, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi. This FLC on which you have commented has been restarted because the consensus was unclear. Can you revisit to make sure your comments have been addressed, and if possible, make a declaration of Support, Oppose or Neutral? Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 16:37, 30 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

It's good to see you on my watchlist ... don't disappear for such a long time anymore! Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 13:59, 21 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello. There is currently an RfC in progress at Wikipedia talk:Featured list criteria#RfC - 3.b review in progress regarding Criteria 3b of the featured list criteria and whether it should be modified or eliminated. As you participated in a previous discussion regarding Criteria 3b when it was first introduced, this discussion may be of interest to you. –Grondemar 16:15, 16 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:The yards dvd cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:56, 2 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

You have reviewed Philadelphia Phillies all-time roster (E) at WP:FLC. Demands by opposers at that nomination have resulted in a merge. I am asking all commenters to return to the FLC page and re-review if time is available. I appreciate your help and apologize for the inconvenience this has caused you. — KV5 • Talk • 22:33, 20 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hey, as the nominator has not edited for a while I thought I would address the issues that you arose at the FLC. NapHit (talk) 10:50, 2 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I fixed the problems at the General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union! --TIAYN (talk) 15:49, 2 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Los Angeles Dodgers in the Baseball Hall of Fame is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Los Angeles Dodgers in the Baseball Hall of Fame until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:15, 4 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Comments have been addressed. Albacore (talk) 12:36, 7 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Crystal Clear x3 02:59, 7 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

....another message there. Crystal Clear x3 09:06, 7 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for uploading File:Heber Manning Wells.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. --ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 15:06, 14 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of Armenian SSR (1936-1940).png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:03, 21 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Are you going to update the page after each newly played match? The more competent people would contribute -- the better. I'm asking this because had scrupulously edited in the past.--Avdav (talk) 21:51, 20 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

When I usually come by to update, I see that it's already been updated. :) If it's not updated, then, of course I will do it. Right now I am working on the List of Armenia national football team results. If you can help me out, I'd appreciate.--Cheetah (talk) 02:43, 21 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'll try to help as much as I can. The source of all played matches can be taken from here: http://armfootball.tripod.com/id8.html --Avdav (talk) 08:58, 21 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello Crzycheetah, I have nominated List_of_counties_in_West_Virginia for FLC. I would be very grateful if you could look at the FLC page and let me know anything as far as Support and Comments. I noticed you have alot of experience with County FLC lists and would be very gratefulCoal town guy (talk) 15:36, 14 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

2 supports!, many thanks if you could go by and take a lookCoal town guy (talk) 03:43, 15 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

First of all thanks for the review! Second, I have addressed all the points, one of which I have a comment. Disc Wheel (Malk + Montributions) 01:28, 4 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Okay now I've addressed all the issues. Disc Wheel (Malk + Montributions) 21:24, 4 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello Crzycheetah, I'm contacting you because we need some Armenian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on hy.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need assistance with a personal message for the Armenian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 16:47, 17 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hey Crzycheetah. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:43, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I'm new to the wiki community and would like to start working on editing the property insurance page with the help and collaboration of more experienced contributors. Do you think you can help me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lgkkitkat (talk • contribs) 16:14, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps my initial request was too vague. There is a recommendation that the Chartis article be merged with AIG's page. I think the Property Insurance page could be strengthened with parts of AIG's page since it shows how current events and emerging trends effect it's regulation by the government. Hurricane Sandy and updated payouts of the WTC are not on the Property Insurance page either - which to me seem to be relevant. Do you think adding more information would be beneficial to the Property Insurance page? If so would you be interested in collaborating what facts should be included? Any response would be kindly appreciated. Thank you.Lgkkitkat (talk) 17:56, 14 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kim Basinger filmography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nadine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

I saw your conversation with Peejay long ago. I was one of the editors who previously removed those players from the table but i changed my mind. Some players like Will Keane, Pereira played the exhibition games. They were IN the squad. And Peejay clearly did numerous reversions so I think he still follows the idea that those players should stay in the table.HugoRicciLeah (talk) 18:28, 31 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

The bolded word should be were. They are not there anymore.Cheetah (talk) 19:14, 31 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

I saw and acknowledge your recommendation at the talk section. I'm not totally against you. The situation is confusing. But I still believe they deserve to be mentioned.HugoRicciLeah (talk) 15:45, 2 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Dad's Army episodes, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 02:00, 7 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Again, it is asked that you explain why you've removed the {{use dmy dates}} from List of Dad's Army episodes, and article that uses dmy dates. Please discuss on the talk page, or somewhere, before removing the template again, including via undo or reversion. Also, your warning to DI2000 is improper, seeing as they added a template rather than removed it. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 15:19, 7 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello there! I see that you are doing some amazing work on FLC with reviewing. If you have some time, would you mind dropping by at this FLC? FrB.TG (talk) 12:01, 10 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hey there, I've been noticing several comments left by you at FLCs about what the director/delegate should do regarding specific nominations. Frankly, the limiting factor is not that we are unable to determine consensus or tell if an FLRC has been there too long or count up the supporters on a list and need someone to tell us what to do, it's whether we have the time right then to process the nominations, and it's not much help to let us know what you think we should do- for example, it would have been more useful on the Ariel Award list to ping the supporters from the first nomination to re-support, then to just tell us that we should count them again anyway. If you are interested in acting as a delegate, please sign up at the 2016 FLC election to possibly become one! --PresN 12:38, 11 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hey! I just reminded you RE FLRC, thought you had forgotten it. As for that Ariel page, I was worried that you would archive it due to the lack of supports, so I just updated it. Anyway, hopefully TRM will come on board and settle down everything.--Cheetah (talk) 22:47, 11 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:31, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Armenia.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Alex2006 (talk) 17:47, 13 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Alex2006 (talk) 17:51, 13 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain to edit disruptively on Armenia. Besides CIA, you removed other reliable sources. Discussions about the geographic location of Armenia took place many times on the Talk page, and you can find them on the archives, which I invite you to read. I kindly advice you that in case of another disruptive edit about this topic I will be force to report you to an administrator. Thanks, Alex2006 (talk) 17:57, 13 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Crzycheetah. To shoot back the same template to somebody who just alerted you to discretionary sanctions, as you did here, is poor form. The discretionary sanctions template is for information, as the template itself clearly states; it's obvious that Alex2006 already has this information, since he gave it to you — isn't it? Don't you agree? In consequence, shunting the same info back to him can only be seen as harassment. Moreover, I see Alex2006 warned you above about specific removal of specific sources at Armenia. So you shot back a warning about using unreliable sources to him, in a rather pointless way, since you gave no specifics. Please remember that Wikipedia is not a battlefield. Uninvolved administrators, such as me, are watching the article, and if you edit uncollaboratively, such as sending harassing warnings, you could be sanctioned. Thank you. Bishonen | talk 19:39, 14 December 2016 (UTC).Reply

Hi Bishonen, that information is also placed on the talk page of Armenia, where I made a post stating why I believe that a particular source is unreliable. It was obvious that I was aware of it. Sending that information to me, what Alex2006 did, was pointless. I assumed then that pointless posts are the norm now, so I just continued what he started. Thank you for telling me that Alex2006 apparently harassed me. I'll keep that in mind.--Cheetah (talk) 02:48, 15 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hey there! I just re-launched the WikiProject Investment.

The site has been fully revamped and updated and I would like to invite you the project.

Feel free to check out the project and ping me if you have any questions.

Cheers! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 19:14, 22 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Armenia at the 2018 Winter Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gonzo fan2007 -- Gonzo fan2007 (talk) 15:41, 5 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

The article Armenia at the 2018 Winter Olympics you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Armenia at the 2018 Winter Olympics for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gonzo fan2007 -- Gonzo fan2007 (talk) 16:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

The article Armenia at the 2018 Winter Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Armenia at the 2018 Winter Olympics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gonzo fan2007 -- Gonzo fan2007 (talk) 17:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please restore back the infobox history timeline. I notice you let the reverter remove the history of Armenia infobox. The fact that it even says "Traditional", 2492 BC, there is no reason to remove this since it's been here for over a decade in the Armenia article! 2602:304:CC93:CB80:7C06:E182:816A:EFE7 (talk) 18:55, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

I have nominated List of state and union territory capitals in India for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Gotitbro (talk) 15:44, 17 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:2005 NBA Draft logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 23 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Armenia national under-21 football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FC Ararat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 02:24, 18 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

The article Jeff Moore (basketball) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail basketball notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SportingFlyer T·C 20:44, 27 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Armenia national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FC Ararat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 6 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

I have nominated Flag of Armenia for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 00:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I noticed that on all of the NFC South first round NFL draft pick list pages, you undid my revisions and wanted to discuss them. It is very clear that these list pages are old, as they utilize an old format for list making. Almost every line has an "align-center" function, where my edits removed the need for this function in every line. Changing the quality of the sortable does this (as seen in List of Chicago Bears first-round draft picks). In addition, it seems clumsy to link to the positions in every single line. I would not be against adding in a position key above the list to explain the abbreviations, but the positions abbreviated and delinked looks much nicer. This is the standard for the college draft picks list pages (such as List of SMU Mustangs in the NFL Draft). I am also alright with keeping the bolded names in the Carolina Panthers list, even though few other first-round draft pick lists have them. Let me know what you think. Debartolo2917 (talk) 15:47, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Take a look at List of Detroit Lions first-round draft picks for an example of where a key succinctly shows position abbreviations with links. Debartolo2917 (talk) 17:14, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Debartolo2917. The lists I undid your changes in have that gold star on the right upper corner. That means it's among featured lists of Wikipedia. If you want to make those changes, go thru the WP:FLC process first. Yes, some of your changes were fine and some were not. Thanks for your interest in these lists.--Cheetah (talk) 08:13, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'm confused what this is trying to do. Do you want me to get other lists featured? I don't see why I cannot edit the lists. What does "going through the WP:FLC process mean? Is there a template I am missing/need to discuss updating? Let me know. Debartolo2917 (talk) 04:49, 26 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

The format that lists with the star use are approved by wikipedians as the best work Wikipedia can offer. You're changing that format. Now, I am just saying if you go thru the FLC process and get approved with your format, then you can make those changes. --Cheetah (talk) 06:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have nominated List of Jacksonville Jaguars first-round draft picks for featured list removal. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 20:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:06, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have nominated List of Cleveland Browns first-round draft picks for featured list removal. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 18:01, 7 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I see you’re a participant in the WikiProject for Finance and Investment and are currently active on Wikipedia. There are some corrections and important updates needed in the article about Digital Currency Group, one of the major players in cryptocurrency. I’ve started a discussion here. I have a COI, as fully disclosed on the page. Given the nature of the topic I thought this might be of interest to you as a participant in the Finance and Investment WikiProject. Thanks very much for your time. CertifiedTurtle (talk) 23:11, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect You Are The One(film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 4 § You Are The One(film) until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Portland Trail Blazers has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article List of registered political parties in Spain (1976–1984) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:N unfulfillment; unsourced material concerning a noncontemporary field of partially "ghost" political entities encompassing a timespan with the end-date's age of over 39 years

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiHuman007 (talk) 20:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article List of registered political parties in Spain (1985–1993) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:N unfulfillment; unsourced material concerning a noncontemporary field of partially "ghost" political entities encompassing a timespan with the end-date's age of over 30 years

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiHuman007 (talk) 20:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply