Enix150

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to MAPKAP kinase-2, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Funandtrvl (talk) 19:25, 6 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:RCS-4 molecular structure.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

You can use {{pd-chem}} to tag any chemical structure images, because they are ineligible for copyright. Also, in the future, please upload chemical structures as .png rather than .jpg, as .png is much better quality. Thanks, shoy (reactions) 13:26, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Should I use the {{pd-chem}} tag at the bottom of the page like you did? or should I put it in the source where I had been leaving my sig? Is there an easy way to upload the image as a .png after having already uploaded it as a .jpg? I have a .png version which, you're right, does look alot nicer, but since the current version is "RCS-4 molecular structure.jpg" it won't let me rename it "RCS-4 molecular structure.png". Also it appears I uploaded this to both Wikipedia and Commons, is there an easy/speedy way to get rid of with wiki version to save up some space? Sorry for all the questions, and thanks for your help! Enix150 (talk) 22:26, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:RCS-8 molecular structure.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on JWH-167 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 01:05, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Just a quick FYI, you should create the target page before creating redirects to it. --Dylan620 ^{(t • c • r)} 14:28, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

I'm pretty much certain that whatever cecchem were selling as "Eric-1" was not Corey lactone 4-phenylbenzoate, despite what their website may say...this is a real compound, it is an intermediate in the synthesis of some prostaglandins, but there is nothing in either the scientific or patent literature that would indicate this compound or anything remotely similar in structure has any stimulant effect at all. The page should probably be deleted to remove this misinformation from the internet, just in case any trigger happy governments decide that Corey lactone 4-phenylbenzoate should be banned as a potential new drug of abuse (see for instance what happened with naphyrone on the basis of internet rumour and speculation)...would be a shame to see a pharmacologically inactive but commercially useful compound be banned because some Chinese RC manufacturer decided to use it as their fake name to relabel old stock of mephedrone as after it was made illegal!

It is debatable whether cecchem have actually come up with any novel compounds as they claim to have, though I think some samples of one of the early "Eric" compounds turned out when tested to in fact be the N,N-dimethyl analogue of mephedrone, which was novel at the time if hardly very creative. Eric-4 may possibly have been invented by cecchem, but more likely (given that it appeared in Sweden quite some time before it showed up anywhere else) it was a custom synthesis request from a Swedish manufacturer of synthetic cannabis blends which was then put on cecchem's general stock list after the customer continued to buy more of it. Meodipt (talk) 06:48, 30 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:43, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Church of the Tree of Life. Since you had some involvement with the Church of the Tree of Life redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Passargea (talk) 01:05, 15 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on File:SRT-1460 structure.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:58, 16 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Talk:MPPP requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article consists of a dictionary definition or other article that has been transwikied to another project and the author information recorded.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Enix150 (talk) 10:47, 13 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi. When you recently edited Pho, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Green onion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:48, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello Enix150. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Threonine metabolism, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Does not redirect to a different or incorrect namespace. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:34, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Exogamy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anglophone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

The article CJC-1293 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet the general notability guideline. It has received only the briefest of mentions in one paper - I can't find any other information on google books or google scholar.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SmartSE (talk) 18:39, 1 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liebermann reagent, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AMT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 18 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Methylpropyltryptamine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. — kikichugirl ^inquire 01:46, 2 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is CJC-1293. JohnCD (talk) 08:42, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CJC-1293 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CJC-1293 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 10:49, 6 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Froehde reagent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to MDA, AMT, PMMA, Mace and PMA

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:07, 1 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Panacea (medicine), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Linnean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:27, 19 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Corynantheidine. Since you had some involvement with the Corynantheidine redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Sydb (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cordyline australis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muttonbird (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of portmanteaus, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Telugu, Tollywood and Globish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 14 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Smenospongia echina, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whispering^(t) 13:37, 28 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Arecibo message. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 12:30, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

My apologies, but I had to undo changes to this article that included yours. This was unintentional, as your edits looked legitimate, but in order to undo a bunch of other stuff the tool made me include yours as well. Please feel free to re-add them! DP76764 (Talk) 14:00, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 491 (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bo Andersson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:25, 28 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Project Penguin. Since you had some involvement with the Project Penguin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:31, 20 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of Intervention episodes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to A&E

Steve Harvey's Funderdome (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Thunderdome

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 26 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of portmanteaus, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Low, Roadster and Fugly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 29 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chulukua, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ursolic acid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page P38.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Fringer. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 10#Fringer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:21, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bentonite

added a link pointing to Plasticity

Redmond, Utah

added a link pointing to Pink salt

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 10 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phyllospadix scouleri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cordage.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Enix150, Wikipedia's policy requires that all content at Wikipedia be WP:Verifiable. Your additions at List of portmanteaus restored unsourced content previously reverted per policy. As these items did not contain a citation to a reliable source, they were reverted per policy, which states:

All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists and captions, must be verifiable. All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports^[2] the material. Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed.

Please either revert yourself, or add inline citations for the two items you added. The burden of proof is on the person adding content to an article to show that they are verifiable. The citations should have been added by the IPs who originally added the content, but since you have restored it, the burden is now on you. Please note that self-published sources like Wikipedia and Wiktionary cannot be used. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 18:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Mathglot, citation added. Though I was under the impression that entries in disambiguation pages and List-Class articles didn't require citation if it is present in the linked article. Cheers! Enix150 (talk) 01:55, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your impression seems like a reasonable one, and I wasn't sure if it was policy or not, as I could see it going either way. I checked around and it's not quite the case; here's what I found: WP:SOURCELIST, and WP:MINREF. My original revert of the IP was due to the fact that at least some of the IP's three items looked like compound words, not portmanteaus to me, so I thought they deserved a cite, to settle the question. (Probably a lot of other words on the page do, too; but it's a volunteer project, and someone else can deal with the rest.) Given my doubts and the removal, my reading of those two links is that the items should be cited. But it could be the case that some of the words don't require it, although maybe not for the reason you stated. The reason you gave could still be out there somewhere as guideline or policy, and if you find it, could you please ping me, and let me know? Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 02:10, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of portmanteaus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pigasus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Nam kaeng hua chai thao

added a link pointing to Pepper

Tom som

added a link pointing to Thai

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Badr Brigade.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 10 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:46, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ohnoitsjamie, hey mate, I don't believe I was spamming, though I can see why my repetitive edits might have been flagged as such. My additions stem from a debate over the List of portmanteaus wherein some users have questioned the etymologies of some of these portmanteaux and deleted them for not having citation specifically referring to their origin. I found a source that references many of these words as portmanteaus, so I was adding the citation to each word's appropriate article. If this was in error or there was something wrong with my formatting please let me know. Cheers! Enix150 (talk) 04:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

You were indeed spamming. Please also read WP:COI, which may apply here. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ohnoitsjamie, now I am very confused. Why would this be a conflict of interest? Can you please explain why you see this as spamming? Thanks! Enix150 (talk) 21:14, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please read WP:REFSPAM. I said that it may apply. In any case, SpinningSpark's comment below provides an additional rationale why we don't need the same reference plastered all over the place. Furthermore, that sources is questionable in terms of WP:RS and simply lists a bunch of portmanteaus, and isn't very useful anyway. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:18, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ohnoitsjamie, ok, thank you! Yes, that source is basically just a list of etymologies, which is why I thought it was perfect to cite these words officially as portmanteaux. The next time the debate comes up in List of portmanteaus though, I will point users toward this conversation. Cheers! Enix150 (talk) 21:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

If your concern was referencing the List of portmanteaus page then there was absolutely no need to shoehorn refs into dozens of other articles. I came here from the Telegraphy article where I thought that your insertion concerning cablegram was an unnecessary diversion of the flow of the article. We don't need etymological information everywhere a portmanteau or acronym is used. Maybe when the word is the article headword, but even then, only if we have something interestingly encyclopaedic to say about it. Otherwise, leave that sort of stuff to Wiktionary. SpinningSpark 17:18, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Spinningspark, thank you for your help. I will quote this next time the debate comes up in List of portmanteaus. Cheers! Enix150 (talk) 21:17, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Spinningspark, thank you for your help. I will quote this next time the debate comes up in List of portmanteaus. Cheers! Enix150 (talk) 21:17, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Better to quote policy and guidelines rather than my opinion. WP:SAL says quite plainly Being articles, stand-alone lists are subject to Wikipedia's content policies, such as verifiability... which means, per WP:V, that referencing is required in the list article page itself. What other articles say and what references they contain does not matter, Wikipedia cannot reference itself. SpinningSpark 21:34, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of portmanteaus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puma.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cryptochrome, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Photoreceptor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Starlite, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PVA glue.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

The alien bounty hunters are also shapeshifters. 184.152.237.222 (talk) 08:35, 16 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

The Colonists are now mentioned in the shapeshifting article. Cheers! Enix150 (talk) 09:02, 16 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited PF-07321332, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pyrrolidone.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Qult of Qirli and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 5#Qult of Qirli until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:25, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Makavians and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 20#Makavians until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:10, 20 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pepe the Frog, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haha.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Trumpanzee and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 28#Trumpanzee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Fram (talk) 08:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Trumpanzees and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 28#Trumpanzees until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 16:10, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of portmanteaus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democrat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Schwagstock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bluff.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 17 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saliha Mahmood-Ahmed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashmiri.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thermobaric weapon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foxhole.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of portmanteaus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glamazon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 7 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LSM-775, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Periphery.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:40, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sufism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orientalist.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

I notice you've been doing additions recently to the draft article for The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch. I found some more mainstream references you can use if you wish, as I don't have the time right now. nytimes.com, kutv.com, newsweek.com, ksl.com. None of these are currently being used as references and all mention the TV series. 5Q5|^✉ 14:00, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sufism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orientalist.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 3 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Ngwenya Mine, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. See MOS:SEAOFBLUE and MOS:OVERLINK specifically. Country names should not be wikilinked, and we should try to avoid placing two links right next to one another, where they might be read as a single link. Lord Belbury (talk) 18:05, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christie Palmerston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pathfinder.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi, just to explain re Weipa. We don't add wiki links in section headers, only in the text body. Just one of the very many Manual of Style rules we have, see MOS:LINKSTYLE. Kerry (talk) 21:18, 24 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Dragon International Film Studios

added a link pointing to Hollywood

List of portmanteaus

added a link pointing to Tollywood

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Three Sisters (Australia)

added links pointing to Nepean and Katoomba

Banana flour

added a link pointing to Coagulant

Leinster Downs

added a link pointing to Pini

Palepai

added a link pointing to Motif

SS Kuring-gai

added a link pointing to Manly

Si-Te-Cah

added a link pointing to Duck decoy

Titjikala

added a link pointing to Mount Franklin

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Three Sisters (Australia)

added links pointing to Nepean and Katoomba

Leinster Downs

added a link pointing to Pini

Palepai

added a link pointing to Motif

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of portmanteaus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Apropos.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of portmanteaus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mexican.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Chris Knight (anthropologist)

added a link pointing to Yanyuwa

Dadi Toka Jr

added a link pointing to Motu

Glitter

added a link pointing to Colgate

Microbead

added a link pointing to Colgate

Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2015

added a link pointing to Colgate

Parish of Nocoleche

added a link pointing to Kunja

Parish of Peka

added a link pointing to Kunja

Toothpaste

added a link pointing to Colgate

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Parish of Nocoleche

added a link pointing to Kunja

Parish of Peka

added a link pointing to Kunja

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Ptolemaic dynasty

added a link pointing to Arsinoe

Shakshouka

added a link pointing to Ottoman

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ptolemaic dynasty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arsinoe.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bavarian cream, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neufchâtel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect ⏫ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 25 § ⏫ until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:44, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect ⏬ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 25 § ⏬ until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:45, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect 🛋️ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 25 § 🛋️ until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:50, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect A✳️ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 25 § A✳️ until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:57, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect 👩‍💻 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 25 § 👩‍💻 until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect 🫸 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 27 § 🫸 until a consensus is reached. The Banner talk 20:29, 27 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Push.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of portmanteaus, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Incognito and Nonentity.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of portmanteaus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blockbuster.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect Misophaes has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 3 § Misophaes until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect 🫗 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 10 § 🫗 until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:20, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect 🏚️ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 10 § 🏚️ until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:21, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect 👯‍♂️ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 10 § 👯‍♂️ until a consensus is reached. Qwerfjkltalk 17:32, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect 💁‍♀️ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11 § 💁‍♀️ until a consensus is reached. MicrobiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish•cultures)} 13:20, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Enix150

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MicrobiologyMarcus and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect 💁‍♂️, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11 § 💁‍♂️.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MicrobiologyMarcus}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

MicrobiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish•cultures)} 13:20, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect 💁 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11 § 💁 until a consensus is reached. TartarTorte 18:11, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect 🧑‍🦳 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 13 § 🧑‍🦳 until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow • talk 21:32, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect 🔞 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 16 § 🔞 until a consensus is reached. Thryduulf (talk) 18:28, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect Swe-bop has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 31 § Swe-bop until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:43, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect ☄️ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 25 § ☄️ until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 18:46, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

You stated in your edit summary for this edit that derelict house is not an emoji and that it's printworthy. Why? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 13:14, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Koavf: Hey mate, 🏚 is a Unicode symbol while 🏚️ is the emoji based on that symbol. All Unicode symbols and Unicode-approved emojis that I've seen have been tagged as printworthy, so I continued with this pattern. Hope this clears things up. Cheers! Enix150 (talk) 18:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sure, thanks. So why would you think these are all printworthy? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:49, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

After this discussion and this discussion ended without a real consensus, I've been filling in all of the R from emoji templates with the emojis' official names. I noticed that all of the Unicode-approved emoji/symbol redirects whose templates were already properly filled out also included the printworthy tag, so I continued with that pattern. Do you have reason to believe that it would be unprintworthy? Enix150 (talk) 01:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reasonable, thanks. Yes: 1.) I've never seen a print encyclopedia that had "derelict house emoji" in it 2.) I don't know where/how these would be sorted as entries in a print encyclopedia, and 3.) I find it very unlikely that someone would go to a print encyclopedia for this: virtually by necessity, someone encountering these emojis will have a digital device and it would be infinitely easier to look it up using copy/paste online than it would be to crack open 6.5 million articles of the English language Wikipedia. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect ㊙ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 25 § ㊙ until a consensus is reached. Fram (talk) 09:07, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

I notice that many of your redirects have been categorized as both "printworthy" and "unprintworthy". At most one of these should be used, and if you aren't sure, simply use neither. Both at the same time doesn't make any sense though. Fram (talk) 12:03, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Fram: I agree only one or neither tag should be used, but I haven't marked any redirects as unprintworthy as far as I know. Can you show me what you mean? Enix150 (talk) 18:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey Enix. We've a little behind on our reviews, but I stumbled across some flag redirects you created back in November, 🏴󠁵󠁳󠁧󠁵󠁿 as an example. I asked if anybody saw that displaying as anything other than a black flag in their OS/browser, but none of us saw it as such. What are you using that that emoji, and the several others like it (🏴󠁵󠁳󠁡󠁳󠁿, 🏴󠁵󠁳󠁭󠁰󠁿, 🏴󠁵󠁳󠁰󠁲󠁿, 🏴󠁵󠁳󠁵󠁭󠁿, 🏴󠁵󠁳󠁶󠁩󠁿, 🏴󠁡󠁧󠀱󠀱󠁿, and 🏴󠁡󠁧󠀱󠀰󠁿) come up as country flags for you? Hey man im josh (talk) 12:52, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Hey man im josh: Hey Josh. I can't personally view them in my browser, but I've seen others using them in the wild. They were kept per this discussion, so I added some of the other flags. I found information for these emojis on Emojipedia: (🏴󠁵󠁳󠁧󠁵󠁿, 🏴󠁵󠁳󠁡󠁳󠁿, 🏴󠁵󠁳󠁭󠁰󠁿, 🏴󠁵󠁳󠁰󠁲󠁿, 🏴󠁵󠁳󠁵󠁭󠁿, 🏴󠁵󠁳󠁶󠁩󠁿, 🏴󠁡󠁧󠀱󠀱󠁿, & 🏴󠁡󠁧󠀱󠀰󠁿). There are quite a few flags that are not RGI-approved yet. 🏴󠁭󠁭󠀱󠀵󠁿 (Flag of Mon State), 🏴󠁭󠁭󠀱󠀷󠁿 (Flag of Shan State), and 🏴󠁭󠁭󠀰󠀲󠁿 (Flag of Bago Region) also have redirects to their State flags, and each of the 50 US State flag emojis have redirects to their respective flags too. Cheers! Enix150 (talk) 19:37, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Just so I'm clear, I'm not at all looking to nominate them for deletion. We were just looking to try to understand what these were viewed in that resulted in them actually being viewable. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:55, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Oh good! I was a little worried the emoji redirect discussions would return. Sorry, I'm not sure, but there is a Firefox plugin called Character Identifier that confirmed the flag names for what it's worth. Maybe I'll try to ask someone I've seen using it which setup they use. Enix150 (talk) 20:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect Redwop has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25 § Redwop until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect Disidrose has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 5 § Disidrose until a consensus is reached. —Alalch E. 13:25, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Enix150,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Omeganon for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Omeganon to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:05, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of portmanteaus, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of portmanteaus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 15 December 2024 (UTC)Reply