User talk:FrB.TG/Archive 5

Thankyou for your constructive comments during the peer review. Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Rod Steiger/archive1 is underway if you'd care to comment further. Cheers. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:07, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yup Doc! Will review it shortly. -- Frankie _talk 08:32, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi there,

Could you kindly close Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/87th Academy Awards/archive1 and update the 87th Academy Awards's article page and its talk page? I appreciate your help.

Oh, and I will submit List of accolades received by The Artist for FLC on September 23.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 01:51, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

I or Cowlibob will do that. -- Frankie _talk 08:32, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wow! A great surprise for me to come back. Thanks. :-) -- Frankie _talk 08:32, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! :) -- Frankie _talk 08:32, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 23 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Hope you're well. I've got another actress filmography at FLC. Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Nicole Kidman filmography/archive1. Would you like to review this list? Cowlibob (talk) 21:03, 23 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello again,

Whenever you have the time, could you address the comments left by Cowlibob and other reviewers as much as possible. I'm trying to do so, but I have to keep in mind that I am beginning classes. So it will take teamwork to finish this task. Thanks for your help and cooperation.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 22:08, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sonam Kapoor you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:00, 1 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks very much for your helpful comments, at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/R U Professional/archive1.

I've gone ahead and directly utilized all your suggestions to modify the article -- as I felt all were quite useful.

Perhaps you could revisit?

Thanks again,

— Cirt (talk) 18:22, 2 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! :) -- Frankie _talk 20:45, 2 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

It's me again hahaha, I don't know if you're busy, and I might be a little extra, but I really would like to see your review on this FLC! Thanks Frankie!!! GagaNutella^talk 02:53, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Of course. I was just waiting for Johanna's comments to be resolved. Will look in a few hours. -- Frankie _talk 06:53, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I was very busy. I just saw your comments, which are a very good ones. That's why I really wanted you to review it. I think the most difficult thing will be the lead. Even I have so experience with leads, this one is so difficult lol anyway, I will work on it during the weekend. GagaNutella^talk 15:31, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations Frankie. Are you satisfied with this?   Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:37, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Why would I be not? Thank you both! :-) -- Frankie _talk 13:31, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:55, 4 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

This list has been promoted to FL status yesterday and is my first FL success. Thanks for reviewing/commenting/supporting the list's promotion at its FLC.   Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:39, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations. I also hope to have first FA success with Sonam Kapoor. Also, all the best for your journey. -- Frankie _talk 04:36, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Can you please review this for GA? Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:30, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I am trying to take Sonam Kapoor to FA therefore I don't think I will be able to take it. Good luck though! -- Frankie _talk 10:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Okay, Good luck to you too. BTW I was wondering why you droped the idea of taking this list to FL status? It nearly meets every criteria and you have been the major contributor. Yashthepunisher (talk) 13:00, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

If you look at my FLs I stopped contributing to Bollywood lists after Madhuri Dixit filmography. Will nominate it someday, when I don't have any other article to nominate. -- Frankie _talk 13:08, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ok. Yashthepunisher (talk) 13:20, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Yashthepunisher: I have nominated the article for FAC, my first one. Here is the link if you wanna leave comments. :) -- Frankie _talk 15:48, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please leave your comments here, I'll try to reply at the FAC. Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:38, 8 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Just a gentle reminder. Yashthepunisher (talk) 03:33, 13 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sorry I didn't notice your previous post. I'll take a look at the soonest. -- Frankie _talk 14:00, 13 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Frankie, do you like THG? Oh, and thank you for your support on my FLC. GagaNutella^talk 14:19, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

What if I say I have never seen The Hunger Games? :D I'm waiting for the final one and I'll watch the four films together. -- Frankie _talk 14:22, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

You must watch them and read the books lol I just asked that because I wanted to know if you want to work with me on its accolades list for a future FLC. What do you think? GagaNutella^talk 14:40, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I will. I really like Jennifer's films. Yes, we can definitely work, but first I gotta make Brad Pitt a featured topic (after taking his awards list and Plan B Entertainment to FL and GA, respectively). -- Frankie _talk 14:44, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

You've got a lot work. Make sure I'm going to review his list. After my nomination for AHS ends, I will work very very veryyyyy hard on Gaga's awards and then THG. I think it will take the time for both of us be free. GagaNutella^talk 14:56, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I will inform you when I nominate it. Gaga's awards list is already in a pretty good shape. Make sure that every line for introducing awards have reliable sources, and is accurate. You can read List of awards and nominations received by Taylor Swift to get an idea what you need further to do! -- Frankie _talk 15:08, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please notice me. Thank you for the advice. GagaNutella^talk 15:46, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) please tell me you've at least read the books. I personally saw all three of the previous films the day they were released to theaters. Anybody who likes the books and/or J-Law is sure to enjoy them! Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:02, 8 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Meaning to. To be honest I don't like to wait for the completion of a film series which take years so most of the time I wait for the whole series to end and watch them all together. The crappy Fifty Shades of Grey is an exception. -- Frankie _talk 20:06, 8 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I see. Never read any of the Fifty Shades of Grey books or saw the film, but heard they're really bad. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:18, 8 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I watched the film (not being aware of its plot) and was pretty disappointed as it objectifies a woman. Glad that you haven't watched it. -- Frankie _talk 20:31, 8 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello again,

Thank you once again for your assistance to bring List of accolades received by The Artist (film) to featured list status. I honestly am grateful for the help especially since I have college classes (but thankful the workload is not hard so far).

With that being said, I understand you are at hard work with other lists such Brad Pitt and Lady Gaga related topics. However, if or when you do have the time, could you please create an infobox summarizing the awards and nominations received by No Country for Old Men at its respective accolades list page and a column listing all the dates for the awards. I honestly do not want to be a bother to your work, but Vivvt are working tirelessly to try to save the list from demotion, and we would appreciate the help. If you are unable to do so, that's absolutely fine. Anyways, please give it some thought and thanks for your contributions, once again.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 07:16, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I will try to add them soon. -- Frankie _talk 15:14, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I think as best practice, it's generally frowned upon to notify individual editors on their user talk pages to come and comment at a particular WP:FAC.

That is, unless you are specifically notifying them with a neutrally worded message because they had already previously organically come to participate in a level of discussion about that article -- like as the prior GA Reviewer, or at Peer Review.

It is okay, however, to post neutrally worded notices to the talk pages of relevant WikiProjects with a link to the FAC.

Good luck to you,

— Cirt (talk) 20:54, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I second that! Also, it's better not to expect "favors" by following the QPQ system. I know, your response was made in good faith, but still be more neutral. —Vensatry _(ping) 05:07, 7 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I respectfully disagree. I think when someone comments in your FAC/FLC, you should try to return the "favor" by reviewing their nominations even if they do not ask. Nominations fail most of the time due to lack of activity. -- Frankie _talk 07:13, 7 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

There is absolutely nothing wrong with the QPQ system as such. I was rather suggesting you to keep the requests as neutral as possible. —Vensatry _(ping) 08:35, 7 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:31, 8 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much for the kind words. -- Frankie _talk 22:38, 9 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

It's been a month since the last comment. Do let me know if you'd like to post some at the list's FLC page. Thanks.    — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 02:22, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I will review it tomorrow. -- Frankie _talk 18:08, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ssven2 although I like cricket, I do not have very much knowledge on it (I wish I could). You can ask users like Harrias, The Rambling Man, Vensatry or ChrisTheDude as they are good in sports related articles. -- Frankie _talk 12:51, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

No worries. I thought since you reviewed for Chennai's one, you could review this too.    — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 13:02, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I did but that was a pretty bad review. -- Frankie _talk 13:33, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

How many days does it take for a FLC close? Or is it about how many people support? GagaNutella^talk 03:32, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Three supports but ever nomination ends on a certain period. Do remember that a nomination does not have a deadline. -- Frankie _talk 10:44, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I got it. Thank you. GagaNutella^talk 15:08, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Taylor Swift#Singer-songwriter. Thanks. Calidum 01:15, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I am always game for an article improvement (if I can) but I am going to abstain from participating in any discussion. That is because when one disagrees with you, they tend to comment and attack on the user instead of content. -- Frankie _talk 17:23, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hope you are doing well. Whenever you get some time, could you please take a look at this FLC nomination here and put your comments? Thanks in advance. - Vivvt (Talk) 13:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sure! -- Frankie _talk 13:58, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

The article Sonam Kapoor you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Sonam Kapoor for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 03:42, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Why did you remove the entire 'Producer' table from the Brad Pitt filmography article? What a silly thing to do, he is a prominent Hollywood producer. You did not seek consensus for this on the article talk page prior to doing so, as you should have. Put the table back immediately and seek consensus before making anymore major changes. - ^theWOLFchild 10:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Well I am sorry if it hurt you. You can do it yourself and also remove that featured star (which indicates that it is one of the best lists) as I didn't gain consensus for making it featured too. -- Frankie _talk 10:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

"Hurt"...? So you're resorting to childish insults? Grow up. Show me where it was awarded featured status based on the removal of that table. (Featured status doers not mean "perfect", by the way. Articles are always in need of improvement. Case in point... ) And why should I have to do all the work of un-doing your edits? - ^theWOLFchild 11:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I don't need to "grow up" and I am not going to revert the current version just because you find it "silly". FYI Pitt has starred in most of the films which he has produced so it will be pretty weird to repeat the same films again and again. I am not in the mood of posting some mean words to my fellow editors. You can do whatever you want but don't expect me to restore that version. -- Frankie _talk 11:22, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

You wouldn't be reverting the current version "because I find it silly", you should be reverting because you had no business making major changes without seeking consensus first. Maybe you're new here and didn't realize that, but now you know. You are not the sole arbiter any articles content. You need to realize that this project is a collaborative effort. So, with that said, if you refuse to restore the previous content, I will take that as your tacit admission that you don't give a rat's ass about the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia and you are leaving it to others to clean up your mess. Oh, and as for your comment; " I am not in the mood of posting some mean words to my fellow editors."... maybe you should re-read your first reply here. A completely unnecessary and juvenile insult. The kind of thing an angry teen would say, instead of a mature adult. My suggestion that you 'grow up' was in regards to that. - ^theWOLFchild 22:37, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I have already replied that in the talk page of his filmography. And please discuss all these on talk page of filmography not here. Also you're talking about WP guidelines and policies but I don't seem to see that anywhere that supports your statement. It's probably not a good idea to call someone's hard work a "mess". It's a featured list and no one objected it during its FLC. If you feel it is not the right format, I think you should leave it on FLC delegates to decide. -- Frankie _talk 07:09, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for commenting on my FAC. As you suggested, I consulted a few native English speakers to copy-edit the article. Unfortunately none of them were kind enough to respond. -- Frankie _talk 10:54, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sorry to hear that! I suggest you also try posting neutrally worded notices to talk pages of relevant WikiProjects, and post a request at WP:GOCE, and ask some of your friends who are Category:User en-5 or Category:User en-N but might not be actual Wikipedia editors themselves but just friends in-real-life, to read over the article. Good luck, — Cirt (talk) 10:59, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Frank, I suggest you try and ask User:Corinne to do the job.    — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 07:17, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wow thanks Ssven. :) I surely will if Casliber does not continue until the weekend. Again, thanks a lot. -- Frankie _talk 07:20, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:45, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:45, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Spotted this, Can you salvage it?♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:18, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Looks like a lot of work needs to be done. I would very much like to do it but I better try to promote Sonam Kapoor to FA. I am having a hard time finding a copy-editor. -- Frankie _talk 11:24, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Dr. Blofeld: Is it okay if I work on it later and not now? FLCRs take weeks to end so we do not need to worry. -- Frankie _talk 17:17, 20 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Up to you! If you think yoju might work on it in a few weeks make a note at the removal page. If not it'll likely be removed anyway! I only asked you as I know you've done a lot of great work with filmographies.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:20, 20 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I can't see this lose that star either. I am currently a bit busy in real life to work on it but I will definitely try to save it. -- Frankie _talk 17:29, 20 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Dr. Blofeld: I have left a notice at the FLRC page and should be able to work on it very soon. BTW can you take a look at Sonam Kapoor and do some copy-editing? Although I understand you are very very busy with the Sinatra article (I wish I could do some help with his article), it should not take very much of your time as it has already been copy-edited by Casliber, who did some excellent contributions to the article. -- Frankie _talk 20:00, 20 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Eeeks, sorry I forgot about that one. I'll try to look at it tomorrow!♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:04, 20 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello again,

When you have the time, could you proofread 65th Academy Awards for featured list promotion? I understand you are busy, but I would be grateful for the feedback. Thanks.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 07:39, 20 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sure! -- Frankie _talk 15:29, 20 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi, FrB.TG. I'm just posting to let you know that List of accolades received by The Artist (film) – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for November 23. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 22:32, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Would you mind leaving some comments? It'd be much appreciated, thanks. Azealia911 _talk 15:52, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Consider it done ASAP! -- Frankie _talk 19:11, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sorry to disturb you again but whenever you get time, please leave your comments here. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:45, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Alright! -- Frankie _talk 22:41, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, me too after all Wikipedia is all about team effort! -- Frankie _talk 10:15, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Great! Congratulations to Wikipedians Wikipedia. -- Frankie _talk 19:16, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

I've nominated, but I think I did something wrong. Go to the talk page and see what's happening. GagaNutella^talk 22:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Looks perfectly fine. -- Frankie _talk 12:32, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

The DYK project (nominate) 12:01, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! :) -- Frankie _talk 07:27, 5 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 8 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

I've nominated this article for FAC which also happens to be my first attempt. It is also the first Indian Telugu film article to be nominated for such status. If interested, please leave your comments here. All constructive comments are welcomed. Yours sincerely, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Kailash29792 has nominated the article for FAC. Feel free to leave comments at its FAC page.    — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 09:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Pavanjandhyala and Ssven2: I would very much like to review your nomination but FAC is not my area of expertise and I hate FAC. Good luck though! Thanks for the Diwali wish, Dharmadhyaksha. -- Frankie _talk 13:27, 10 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sad to see it delisted, do you have any plans to work on it? It would be great if the article gets back its GA status. Also, Its very close to become a FT. Yashthepunisher (talk) 06:11, 12 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

I guess I can work on it but given its length it can be a nightmare to work on. Also, it's not close to be an FT as we have her songs list and videography (if created) to be FL/s. -- Frankie _talk 14:31, 12 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

A few days ago I came upon List of cetaceans, a featured list that obviously doesn't meet current standards, and immediately opened a WP:FLRC at Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of cetaceans/archive1. Since then, some of my concerns have been addressed. As I have little experience with featured lists, would you mind taking a look at that list, and see if it meets FL criteria? If not, would you please comment on the FLRC page? Thanks for your help! sst✈^discuss 11:05, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

@SSTflyer: the list has been much improved. Make sure the references are not dead and formatted properly (I can see a bare url). Have alt texts for images. That's all I've got to say but I cannot assure whether or not it meets FL criteria as the topic does not fall within my area of expertise. Yours truly. -- Frankie _talk 11:40, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your helpful advice! sst✈^discuss 12:07, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi there,

Could you proofread 60th Academy Awards for featured list promotion? I would appreciate the help.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 08:17, 17 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

I could if you comment here. -- Frankie _talk 14:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Frankie. I'm just posting to let you know that Brad Pitt filmography – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for December 18. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:22, 20 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi Frankie, could you invite some people to review our FLC? It's been more than 20 days since we nominated it. Thanks! GagaNutella^talk 17:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

It's been a month now and nothing is really happening with this list. Vensatry and Dharmadhyaksha also hasn't responded and I was also inactive for a while. It was discussed by them at its FLC about creating a separate table for "Producer" and another one called "Others" (which will include his role as a narrator also). Can you please do that? because i'm not very good with rowspan and other these kind of things. Something like this or this list will do. Also, please leave your comments at its flc, i don't want this list to fail in its first attempt. Yashthepunisher (talk) 07:55, 27 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

I will probably do it tomorrow or on Sunday. -- Frankie _talk 20:18, 27 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Frankie. I'm just posting to let you know that List of awards and nominations received by Vidya Balan – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for January 1, 2016. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 23:40, 4 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Giants2008: Thanks very much for accepting all of my requests at WP:TFLS. -- Frankie _talk 11:55, 5 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

No problem. Oh, while I'm here, please consider adding a couple of cites in the fourth paragraph of the lead. The rationales behind her non-acting awards aren't really explained in the table, and we wouldn't want cite tags introduced in the article on its big day. The existing table references may have this information; if so, just name them and you're set. Giants2008 (Talk) 19:33, 5 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the concern. The sources for the fourth para can be found in the Other awards and honours section - 2012: Prabha Khaitan Puraskar and 2014: Padma Shri. -- Frankie _talk 09:18, 6 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

I went ahead and added them for you. Everything should be ready now. Giants2008 (Talk) 19:11, 6 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations on two FL promotions in a single day, a remarkable achievement. Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:33, 14 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Indeed! Thank you both. -- Frankie _talk 17:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi there,

Sorry about the delay, but I had university finals and projects and I also came under a nasty cold. Anyways, I left a comment at your latest FLC for Katy Perry. Could you also proofread 60th Academy Awards for FL status? I would appreciate the feedback.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 19:51, 18 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wishing you the same. -- Frankie _talk 10:32, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the support. Merry Christmas. Jimknut (talk) 18:13, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

No problem and all the best. Merry Christmas! -- Frankie _talk 18:15, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Appian Way Productions you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:01, 21 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Appian Way Productions, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Variety and Charles Higham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello! Your submission of List of accolades received by The Hunger Games film series at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 4meter4 (talk) 20:12, 27 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Wish you the same. :) -- Frankie _talk 08:21, 1 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, wishing the same. -- Frankie _talk 15:20, 2 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 5 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Mayabazar turns a FA! Thanks for your contribution as a reviewer.   Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:45, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Pavanjandhyala: Quite a good news to hear! Many many congratulations on your first FA. -- Frankie _talk 08:21, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

The nominator provided a QPQ review. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:49, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi there,

Could you cap your comments over at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/80th Academy Awards/archive2 so that they don't create a big long mess? I would appreciate your cooperation.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 07:20, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sorry I missed the PR for Kapoor, which I finally got round to this morning. I see you've opened it at FAC, so I'll visit there instead. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 08:26, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

To answer your question, the GGlobes do not nominate Documentary songs it seems. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 16:16, 14 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

I thought so, thanks. -- Frankie _talk 17:41, 14 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Have you checked the winners of 61st Filmfare Awards? It was disappointing like always. I thought Masaan will be the big winner in Crtitics category but, that was entirely given to Piku and Kangana for TWMR. Really? Kagngana? By what means it was a critics performance. It was a mainstream performance and should have stick to the main Best Actress category. On the other hand, Richa Chadha, Kalki and Irrfan were completely ignored. They were not even nominated in main categories. And, they didnt win Critics awards either, which makes not nominating them in main categories a dumb and senseless choice.Krish | Talk 08:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

It should have been Akshay Kumar and Irrfan Khan instead of SRK and Ranbir Kapoor for Best Actor category. And it should have been Richa or Kalki winning (or at least nominated in the Best Actress category) the Critics Award. Films like Talvar, Masaan or Dum Laga Ke Haisha should have been the winners of critics awards. Ugh, this year's award was totally unfair. -- Frankie _talk 11:21, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

This year was unfair? They are never fair. Remember The Lunchbox and Lootera were not nominated in main categories, and duds like Chennai Express was nominated for Best Film. Nimrat Kaur was not even nominated in Best Actress category, despite giving the best performance by a Female actor that year, along with Sonakhi in Lootera. I still cannot believe Masaan was shut out from the critics category, a crime that wont be forgiven. And, Dum Laga Ke Haisha won in a totally undeserving category- Cinematography? How about Lyrics, Story or whatever? And, Bombay Velvet won for Special Effects, despite no vfx.Krish | Talk 13:18, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

And the worst part is that it is considered the Indian equivalent of the Oscars, when it actually is the Indian version of Kids Choice Awards or something. The only award that deserves this title is National Film Awards. -- Frankie _talk 13:49, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, absolutely. It's even worse than Kids Choice Awards. At least there, the winners are selected by actual votes. But, here in the so-called "Oscars of India" are selected by Sirname (Bachchan, Kapoor, Khan, Roashan and so on). If you look, then Amitabh Bachchan and Shah Rukh Khan over takes Merly Streep in terms of "Best Actor nomination" because SRK has over 22 Best Actor nomination alone, and BIG B has over 30 nomination for Best Actor alone. The most of their nominations are for average performances. And, not to forget, they even won eight Best Actor awards and that too for average performances, specially SRK. If the biggest actors are present in Bollywood, then why still they haven't gained the focus of any Hollywood directors? God saves acting then.Krish | Talk 14:27, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Are you it's major contributor? if yes, do you have any FL plans for it? Since you have earlier worked on a similar list. There'll be a complete set of national award FL's after that: Best Actor, Best Actress, Best Supporting Actor and Best Supporting actress. Yashthepunisher (talk) 15:33, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

I am not but @Krish!: is. Maybe has plans? -- Frankie _talk 15:38, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I have plans for it. It's almost complete, it failed because claims of youngest, oldest winners couldn't be found. You know, media doesn't cover National Awards like they should for regional cinema. Anyway, my main focus right now is taking Bajirao Mastani to FA for 18 December 2016 main page appearance. This list will be on hold till June-July.Krish | Talk 15:50, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Okay and Mary Kom also have a strong FA potential. Any plans for it? Yashthepunisher (talk) 15:59, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

I had planned it for its first anniversery appearance, but since i was busy in the summer vacation, that didn't happen. Do you think I should take it first to FA? (It's large/a GA)Krish | Talk 16:16, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

I think Mary Kom can be taken to FA quickly than BM. As the former is a GA already and the latter needs work from the scratch. But, its your choice. Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:21, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Should I conduct a peer review for Mary Kom then?Krish | Talk 16:26, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

It's upto you. Good luck with whatever you do. Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:29, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Yashthepunisher and FrB.TG: I have conduted a PR here, leave your comments for its improvements. Thanks.Krish | Talk 16:47, 16 January 2016 (UTC)@Krish!: I am not sure if I can leave comments there as I doubt my ability to review a non-list article. I am not sure though as the only peer review I have reviewed is Wikipedia:Peer review/Rod Steiger/archive1. -- Frankie _talk 18:51, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Hope you are doing well. Whenever you get time, could you take a look at the FLC and provide your comments? - Vivvt (Talk) 13:30, 19 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Vivvt: I was just about to comment; however, the list has been archived. -- Frankie _talk 16:55, 20 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks much for the consideration. I will reopen the FLC after two weeks. - Vivvt (Talk) 04:28, 23 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Your revert added unsourced material to the article (see Talk:Salman Khan filmography), thereby violating WP:Burden and WP:Reliable sources. I don't template the regulars, but consider this a Level-2 warning for adding unsourced material (i.e. {{uw-unsourced2}}). Thomas.W ^talk 19:12, 19 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your recent editing history at Salman Khan filmography shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
This warning is required by "the system", which is why you get it. The edit-warring has to stop. Thomas.W ^talk 19:14, 19 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Have you seen the film?Krish | Talk 16:59, 23 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nope, but I have listened to its track "Soch Na Sake", which I think is very good. I am going to watch this. Have you watched it, how is it? -- Frankie _talk 19:12, 23 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

It's no Argo. But its a worthy attempt, a well made thriller. First half is breathless, second half falls flat, overall It's a very good film. A perfect film for Republic Day celebrations. Akshay Kumar is Outstanding and Nimrat Kaur is fantastic. Akshay should be nominated for this film and I think he should win the Best Actor next year, though SRK chances are high for Raees, and Fan. But Come on since Leo is getting his due, Indian awards should give Kumar's his.Krish | Talk 05:45, 24 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hey there! I nominated the article of actress Kalki Koechlin for GA Status. Are you interested to review it? Please let me know.   Numerounovedant (talk) 8:13, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

@Numerounovedant: I will be happy to take that. Will review it tomorrow if that's okay. -- Frankie _talk 19:10, 24 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! Numerounovedant (talk) 4:16, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for helping me to change this even thought we had a rough time. My ':)' was for you for helping me but you took it personally and some other editors got involved! Jeez! Wiki guys needs a chill pill. 86.190.207.115 (talk) 19:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

@86.190.207.115: I didn't take anything personally. It's just that I have seen IPs in form of trolls and vandals but instead I should have helped you. Anyway, welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you like contributing to the encyclopedia. -- Frankie _talk 19:47, 24 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

If you say my dear. That's great. Happy wiking 😊 86.190.207.115 (talk) 19:59, 24 January 2016 (UTC)Reply