IdiotSavant

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Atiu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Māori.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Any idea if there is a source with the political affiliations of the candidates in the three constituencies won by independents (or if any other parties won)? Would be good to get a party breakdown of the vote figures. Cheers, Number 57 22:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Semisi Telefoni, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tongan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

The article Portuguese Pirate Party has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article's subject is not notable and not referenced in any secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LongLivePortugal (talk) 00:57, 14 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi IdSav. I know it may yet to be described as that in future, (a) but none of the sources cited (b) nothing I can find has yet to describe it as a constitutional crisis at present (10:20 am UTC). Your thoughts? Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:23, 22 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

The samoa Observer article describes it s such, which is why I went with that language. I'll add a quote to the relevant ref. --IdiotSavant (talk) 10:25, 22 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Formula One and all-round brilliant motorsport journalist Murray Walker's autobiography is called "Unless I'm Very Much Mistaken". It refers to a description of some F1 race where his commentary was "Unless I'm very much mistaken... I AM very much mistaken". And here I am very much mistaken. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:20, 30 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your work on 2021 Samoan constitutional crisis. I have a question : you added "Speaker of the House Leaupepe Toleafoa Faafisi". According to the article Leaupepe Toleafoa Faafisi he "retired at the April 2021 election."^[1] So how come he's still acting as, and making declarations as, "Speaker of the House" when he's no longer a member? Cabayi (talk) 06:39, 24 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Just read your blog. I get it now. Cabayi (talk) 07:07, 24 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

In French an Idiot savant is a quite funny name. I like it. But you knowledge about Samoan names doesn’t seem to be very “savant”. Most authoritative sources like RNZ here or local Samoa Observer, doesn’t (never?) use the complete name of the Former PM of Samoa. But his main title and the usual name. As for customary usage, titles are always put as prefixes (like Sir in English) to the names of matai. Reverting saying that the the complete name is the only one used is not true. Please reply here, if needed.--Arorae (talk) 14:41, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Continuing this discussion about (full) names in Samoa, I also noticed that common use is to name the Prime Minister as Tuila'epa Sa'ilele Malielegao (with his title included in his name) and sometimes like Tuila'epa Dr Sa'ilele Malielegao, with his title separated from his (short) name. As already told, Tuilaepa is only a title, and in the English names Wikipedia does not add "Sir" or "Dr." or "Hon." to the names. In Fiji, we do not add "Ratu" to the names, even if Fijian newspapers add Ratu to the chiefs of Fiji. Please, reply here.--RotachZ (talk) 06:49, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

I suggest both of you take a look at WP:COMMONNAME. Specifically "Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it generally prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of independent, reliable English-language sources)". This may include titles e.g. Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex. For Samoans, it is best to use whatever they are referred to in English language sources such as those linked above (e.g. RNZ, the Samoa Observer, Samoa Global News etc). So "Fiame Naomi Mata'afa", not just "Naomi Mata'afa", or "Tuilaepa Sailele Malielegaoi", not "Sailele Malielegaoi" (because nobody calls them that). This satisfies the criteria of recognizability and naturalness - naming articles after what people would Google. It also seems to satisfy the policy of consistency, in that there seems to be a policy of including matai titles in article names in the past (which I have naturally followed when adding new ones).

It is complicated by the fact that there have been multiple rounds of title-stripping and renaming, plus efforts to correct typography to include okinas, and there are a lot of redirects in place (e.g. for Tuilaepa). I've restored things to what they were before the latest bout, on the basis that this reflected both policy and a previous consensus. I've also raised the issue on the WikiProject Samoa talk page in the hope that someone there can produce some useful guidance for the future. --IdiotSavant (talk) 11:52, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much for your explanation, but I am not connvinced by the fact that NZ Herald, RNZ and other Samoa medias are always using only the name with the title. And most of time, they also forget 'okina. Okina is now compulsory in Samoan (since 2012 only). Tuimaleali'ifano is still a title, and the correct writing of his name is Va'aleto'a Sualauvi II, with 2 apostrophes in his first name. People doesn't know Samoan on WPen:, and this is not helpulf to put very long names with titles. We are far from the case: Prince Harry. Imho.--RotachZ (talk) 12:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please stop editing my profile content idiot savant as you are including information which is defamatory and patently wrong and have deleted important information I wish to have on my page eg 1. I did not prosecute the DG of health and that report was found to be defamatory by the Suprme Court as he was only subject to employment action not charges 2. Only 2 judges were dismissed the thirds term was not reviewed 3 you also appear to have edited out my genealogy which I wished to have in my page as a link to my extended family Please Stop Edit your own material and not information which has nothing to do with you and is wrong ! Signed Brenda Heather Latu

Its not "your profile". Its a public encyclopedia article about you. It belongs to everyone, and can be edited by anyone. I suggest you read WP:PROUD to see what this means for you.

The earlier version of this article (and changes you have sought to reintroduce) did not comply with Wikipedia's polices on neutrality, verifiability, and no original research. I (and other wikipedia editors) will happily make changes that are supported by neutral, independent sources. If you can suggest any that have been missed, then feel free to do so on the article talk page. In the meantime, your edits of an article about you clearly violate WP:COIEDIT. Please cease.--IdiotSavant (talk) 09:33, 2 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sanele Mao, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Samoan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Focus NZ Party Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 14 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your edit of the Talk Page of my article on Elisapeta Toeava. It is not the first time you have made such an edit, which seems to be required because of 1. My laziness in completing the Talk Page correctly and 2. a BOT programming problem that needs to be corrected. When I prepared the Talk Page I inserted "WikiProject Samoa |class=Start |importance=Low" and this seems to have been changed by User:AnomieBOT to "WikiProject Polynesia|class=Start|WS=yes|WS-importance=Low|category=". Roundtheworld (talk) 09:34, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

That's really annoying from the bot (I suspect its also responsible for the incorrect abbreviations for Tonga and French Polynesia as well then). Anyway, thanks for creating so many articles and adding to the Pacific wikiprojects.--IdiotSavant (talk) 09:39, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for tackling the BOT. I spent 3 years in PNG and 2 in Tonga, both ages ago, but retain an affection for Oceania, so it has been an interesting exercise to work on WIR. Roundtheworld (talk) 09:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

 Template:WikiProject Human rights Collaboration has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 05:51, 12 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for noticing my edit on the talk page of Pacific Underground where I (incorrectly) added the Polynesia Wikiproject. In some contexts New Zealand is included in a definition of Polynesia so it is good for me to learn before I encourage others to do the same. You mentioned the members of Pacific Underground could be included maybe? Do you mean biographies of Polynesian people but who live in New Zealand could be included? If so does it relate to place of birth and / or citizenships? Many thanks Pakoire (talk) 06:46, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for getting in touch. Firstly, that's a nice, solid article and great work. Secondly, I'm not going to start an edit-war over wikiproject classification, so if you think that it also belongs in WP Polynesia (its in cat: Polynesian culture after all), just go ahead and tag it again. My reasoning for removing it was:

* WP Polynesia has sortof geographically excluded Australia, NZ and Hawaii in order to keep its focus on the island countries (sortof - there's some Hawaiian and Māori content in there, usually around mythology, which was all added years ago), so I've followed this in excluding NZ stuff by default unless there's a very obvious strong link.

* For people, I've been going by place of birth or residence or citizenship (or sports team for sports bios). Were they born in / live in / play for (for sports bios) one of WP Polynesia's target countries? So e.g. Oscar Kightley was born in Samoa, and Robbie Magasiva was raised there, so I'd include them, but David Fane is from Auckland so I'd leave him under WPNZ. (There are a lot of Pasifica NZ and Australian bios which could be added BTW; I've been adding them in whenever I notice one).

None of this is any sort of official policy; I just seem to have adopted the initial assessment role; other people will make different judgements.--IdiotSavant (talk) 09:32, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Not sure how many of these you've written bios for but {{DEFAULTSORT}} is missing; I've now spotted the second bio like this: Margaret Makea Karika Ariki. Can you please go back over your creations and mend that? It's expected of users who are autopatrolled to create clean articles that don't require maintenance. Schwede66 20:41, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sorry - I tend to use recent stubs as a template when creating, meaning if they leave stuff out, I do too. I've gone back and checked recent creations and added defaultsort where necessary, which should hopefully mean less of a problem in future.--IdiotSavant (talk) 23:49, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Much appreciated. Schwede66 01:51, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:33, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

The article Meripa Seumanutafa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:36, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 13:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Create the page of this athlete : Ramses Thimoumi.

He participated in the 2019 pacific games in Samoa. If you need info regarding his life or boxing achievements, I can let you know. 2A01:E0A:A8E:2000:EDCA:D6A2:4EA8:A6FE (talk) 23:46, 18 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Not in any of the areas I'm focusing on, sorry (also, I don't actually like doing sports bios).--IdiotSavant (talk) 01:18, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ui-te-Rangiora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polynesian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arus Sem, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arus Sem until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 18 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, IdiotSavant,

I'd like to encourage you to start using Twinkle, an excellent editing tool, when you tag pages for deletion. You can do a lot of other activities with Twinkle, post talk page warnings to troublesome editors, tag articles that have problems, report vandals to noticeboard, post discretionary sanction notices, etc., but it is really great for tagging pages for deletion, whether CSD, PROD, AFD/RFD/CFD/etc. It's great because once you set up your Twinkle Preferences to "Notify page creator", Twinkle will post a notice on your behalf to the editor who created the page you just tagged, letting them know that the page might be deleted and why.

As you can see by the notice above this one for Arus Sem, sometimes bots will step in and inform editors when articles they created have been tagged but I've found bots to be inconsistent in doing this and in the case of this PROD you tagged, the bot never posted a talk page notice. Plus, I think it's better for a deletion notice to come from a fellow editor rather than a bot. Any way, I think once you try out Twinkle, you, like most page patrollers and many admins, will start using it every day as it means you don't have to remember a lot of different templates. I hope you give it a try! Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:58, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

And if you already are using Twinkle, please check your Preferences so that this "Notify" box is checked off. Thanks again. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:00, 20 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:NFP-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:07, 27 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Social-Democratic-Liberal-Party.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi I see you were the last person to update LPHarvey entry Wikipedia. LPH has now sadly died. In NZ 2018. Are you a specialist in his field ?

I want to contact academic people who knew him and his work.,he left a book unpublished. I can give you a fuller list of his work to date.

Any help would be wonderful

Jacqueline 2A01:CB18:7BF:4900:8073:A6A5:51A7:CD4C (talk) 07:19, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) IdiotSavant: There's a detailed obituary at Al-Qantara which can be used to update and expand the article.-gadfium 07:51, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

I'm not a specialist - I was just cleaning up references. Its not an article I would normally pay any attention to except that it was on the cleanup list.--IdiotSavant (talk) 11:06, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Coming in good faith but I'm genuinely confused about this edit. What are the criteria for conclusion not being met? If the issue is that she's only of Polynesian descent and has never lived in the region, then I'm confused why Dwayne Johnson apparently qualifies despite the same applying to him? If the issue is that WikiProject Samoa would be the more appropriate to tag, that's fair but that project does not have a talk page template yet and recommends using the one I added instead. What's the story here? Invisiboy42293 (talk) 01:42, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Not born in Samoa, doesn't live there, hasn't represented it internationally (this is used a lot for sports people). Merely being of Polynesian descent isn't enough, otherwise we'd be categorising people in NZ under WPUK. Johnson has a matai title, which is why he's included.

WP Samoa is a subset of WP Polynesia. As is WP American Samoa for people from there. IdiotSavant (talk) 01:55, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Gotcha, that's fair I suppose. My main rationale for adding it was that the subject is not just of Samoan descent but is particularly public and outspoken about that heritage: has a malu tattoo, wore a Samoan-designed tapa cloth outfit to a red carpet event, has interviewed Johnson twice and addressed him in Samoan, has attributed much of her public persona to her Samoan upbringing, and in particular has spoken on Samoan culture and American media representation of Samoans on a number of platforms (interviews, podcasts, social media, etc.). I respect if that still doesn't qualify her, but that's why I thought she might be of interest to the project, is that it seems to be a prominent part of her public profile and the work she does. Invisiboy42293 (talk) 03:40, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Well, its certainly more of interest than some of the others I've seen. I'll put it back if you haven't already. IdiotSavant (talk) 05:23, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Appreciated! I don't mind putting it back myself, just wanted to clear things up here before going ahead and doing it. Thanks for hearing me out :-) Invisiboy42293 (talk) 05:25, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I saw your recent edit of this article. I think it would be better to revert the specs and instead create two new articles for the solar farms which are being persued instead. I'll do that next week unless you beat me to it. Some background info at https://www.pv-magazine-australia.com/2023/04/17/nz-to-fast-track-approval-process-for-solar-projects/ SmokeySteve (talk) 11:47, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

I think you're right - I was waiting to see if more detail emerged. IdiotSavant (talk) 11:56, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Moti Tikaram, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lami.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:French Polynesian criminals has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:00, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:French Polynesian lawyers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:02, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:French Polynesian medical doctors has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:04, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for building out so much within Niuean politics! I usually edit Niue-related articles when I'm editing (I'm not super prolific and take breaks for chunks of time), and I came back recently to see that you built out a lot and often contribute there. Lots of gaps and redlinks to be filled, and I'm happy to see more information being covered. :) Have a great week! Upjav (talk) 01:46, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Émile Vernaudon, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:26, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Traditional chiefs of Palau has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Sahaib (talk) 09:36, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Category:French Polynesia politician stubs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Democratic Party (Cook Islands) (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:48, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yilku1 (talk) 18:49, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm far from being absolutely clear on the proper syntax of talk page WikiProject banners, but I'd just assume get it right than not. That's why I generally refer to a closely related talk page if at all in doubt.

So I'm now confused how this edit of yours could be correct. How am I, or anyone, supposed to know that Category talk:Papua New Guinea history-related lists should link to WikiProject Melanesia when both Category talk:Papua New Guinea-related lists and Category talk:History of Papua New Guinea link directly to Wikipedia:WikiProject Papua New Guinea; not to mention, there is Wikipedia:WikiProject Papua New Guinea? --DB1729^talk 03:16, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure of the exact history, but WikiProject PNG is now nested within Melanesia. Things tagged as Melanesia:PNG show up under PNG just fine - but things tagged solely under WikiProject PNG don't show up in the Melanesia stats. There's a similar series of nested wikiprojects for Wikipedia:WikiProject Polynesia (Samoa, Tonga, Cook Islands etc), though it has used aliases to ensure consistent tagging. IdiotSavant (talk) 03:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Fair enough, I will try to remember that. Thank you very much for the explanation:) DB1729^talk 03:31, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

You can see how to do substitution for wikiproject templates on Template:WikiProject Tonga; I can try and bodge it into Template:WikiProject Papua New Guinea if you like. IdiotSavant (talk) 03:39, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Late reply. I don't understand what "bodge it into Template:WikiProject Papua New Guinea" means so I didn't know how it could help or not. I put off replying and forgot about it until now.

I notice you haven't corrected the other two I mentioned in the same way. Again, before I created Category talk:Papua New Guinea history-related lists, I consulted both Category talk:Papua New Guinea-related lists and Category talk:History of Papua New Guinea and simply followed suit how those pages did it. Is there some reason those pages should not get the same (WikiProject Papua New Guinea → WikiProject Melanesia PNG=yes) change? Have you just not got to those yet because of whatever system you're using? Maybe you're unconcerned per other stuff exists? Maybe you just never noticed or failed to glean the situation from my original post? or some other reason entirely? DB1729^talk 21:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Struck part of the above. More simply put: I guess I'm just asking is it okay if I make the same change to the other related talk pages? DB1729^talk 21:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yes. Its an edit I do when I notice something, rather than trying to systematically update thousands of articles. IdiotSavant (talk) 23:36, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

The page Category:Proposed solar farms in New Zealand has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:

• The category had been empty for seven days or more and it was not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories. (See section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

– notwally (talk) 01:00, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article Aotearoa NZ Youth Party has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

You've never edited the Auckland Anniversary Article and I find it highly unlikely you were perusing an article about an Auckland holiday around the same time I was editing it. Just because I've proposed to delete articles you've created doesn't mean you should go following my contributions and reverting things. Traumnovelle (talk) 03:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Nzclimatepartylogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:NCAaWA logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Solar power in New Zealand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kaipara.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) Reply

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) Reply