User talk:Kane5187/Archive 1

Hi, Kane5187/Archive 1, Welcome to Wikipedia!

You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.

I hope you like this place--I sure do--and want to stay. If you need help on how to title new articles check out Wikipedia:Naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Wikipedia:Help and The FAQ , plus if you can't find your answer there, check The Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or The Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on My User talk Page.

Additional Tips:

Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!

• If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
• If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
• You can sign your name using three tildes, like &#126&#126~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
• You may want to add yourself to the New User Log
• If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Happy Wiki-ing. -- John Fader 18:43, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Please add edit summaries when you make a change, even if it's minor. mat_x 16:05, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Hello. When creating new articles, please include them in a category and, if it is a stub, add a stub tag. You can see all the available stub tags at: Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types. Category:Categories is the topmost category, where you can see all the other categories. Thanks. JoaoRicardo^talk 05:21, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Question for Kane5187; why are you changing tags on Categories for Osama bin Laden so that "bin" has a capital "B" instead of the lowercase "b" found in the official spelling of his name? -Syberghost 01:53, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

This is a good endeavor, however I saw you change <br /> to <br>. Please don't do that since the former is correcting since the html entity must be escaped and that is how you escape single tags. Just to mae pages properly validate. gren グレン ^? 17:04, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Nope, I definitely don't mind you adding me to the category. It's most of what I contribute in right now, so might as well. --_└ ^Smith120bh/_TALK ^┐ 04:25, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

I have been looking through the list of unwatched pages (available only to administrators) and found 13 Stitches. I see that you created this but were not watching it. You may want to go to your preferences and under the "editing" tab turn on "Add pages you edit to your watchlist". This will enable you to keep an eye out for any edits that are made to pages you create and help to revert vandalism. If you do decide to turn it on can you please drop me a note on my talk page so I can cut down my excessive watchlist. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 02:49, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 18:40, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your positive contribution to the "Horace Mann School" article 21:20, 8 February 2006 (UTC)GreatBarrington

Hey, thought you might be interested in this userbox: {{User Dartmouth}}. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 02:52, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I think they should be merged. Thanks for picking that up. The title doesn't matter too much as long as every reasonable entry is a redirect... I can't see anyone actually typing in either "Big Three (universities)" or "Harvard-Yale-Princeton".

What are your thoughts on the best title for the merged article? Dpbsmith (talk) 00:52, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

I'm not sure about the title. The reason why I was a little hesitant is because the two articles focus on very different aspects of the three schools: Big Three talks about the social and academic prestige, while the HYP focuses on the athletics; but I guess since they refer to the same thing (and use the same terms) they might do better together.

I only stumbled upon those articles today, so I'm not very familiar with it; I'm guessing some of you guys that are working closer to the articles should decide on the name. Nevertheless, I would probably support Harvard-Yale-Princeton since it's both more literal and also has a more solid grounding in an official agreement. Kane5187 03:47, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

I had Big Three on my watchlist, and noticed your edit indicating there was such a similar article (didn't know about the HYP article). I slapped a merge proposal on both, with a talk page explanation on each. They definitely need to be merged - even if they are referring to different aspects (athletics vs admissions), it's different aspects of the same thing. --_└ ^Smith120bh/_TALK ^┐ 02:30, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Please see WP:RM#Steps for requesting a page move. You request has not delt with the talk page. --Philip Baird Shearer 14:12, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Hi Kane, I called your tiny yet important change to the introduction in question at the Tool talk pages. I'd welcome your input. =) --Johnnyw 18:32, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

I noticed that you tagged the page Image:Tll.jpg for speedy deletion with the reason "No source information, no claim of fair use. The image (in the corner) claims a copyright to Steve Tackeff, whose website (http://www.nycmusicphotographer.com/) says that ALL RIGHTS are RESERVED". However, "No source information, no claim of fair use. The image (in the corner) claims a copyright to Steve Tackeff, whose website (http://www.nycmusicphotographer.com/) says that ALL RIGHTS are RESERVED" is not currently one of our criteria for speedy deletion, so I have removed the speedy deletion tag. You can use one of our other deletion processes, proposed deletion or articles for deletion if you still want the article to be deleted. Thanks!

However, in this case, the image qualified for speedy deletion under CSD:G4, and has been deleted anyway. Stifle 20:38, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

I think we should expand on this one--we should also note his career as a famous singer (see Jay Black and the Americans)--his comedic work was/is merely secondary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stanley011 (talk • contribs) 21:11, 13 April 2006

That's definitely a different Jay Black. I'm going to revert your edits -- this Jay Black is in his thirties, tops. There's no way he was around in the '60s. Kane5187 02:28, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Given that the Jay Black I'm referring to is far more famous than yours (just do a google search), I think mine should be the page that immediately pops up when you type in "Jay Black" and then on the top of the page it should say "For the comredian Jay Black, click here." What do you think? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stanley011 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 13 April 2006

Interesting trivia!!!!! Madangry 00:38, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

I was in error when I cited it as the Cramps. The full explanation (along with citations) can be found on the talk page. Thanks for pointing this out!--Lwieise -=- Talk to Me 06:57, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

I appreciate the catch of my error on the Megan McCafferty/Kaavya Viswanathan pages.Alan 22:57, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Moving the following section from my user page. Kane5187 04:09, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up. I completely forgot that I left all that stuff dangling in there as a placeholder. Is this the only way for people to talk to each other, by editing their user pages? Any FAQ I could get on that topic would be appreciated. I'll delete the Scholder stuff now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregoryptm (talk • contribs) 00:47, May 21, 2006

ps: Oh, you already did. Fine. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregoryptm (talk • contribs) 00:48, May 21, 2006

Just to let you know, I changed your vote from "Oppose" to "Keep" to fit the standard voting procedure. If this is wrong, feel free to change it back. Adambiswanger1 01:52, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

• Hey, we are making a Duke Community Wiki at http://www.duiki.com if you want to help out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.3.80.141 (talk • contribs) 00:48, July 19, 2006

Your recent edit to Ed Forchion (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 16:31, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi. Back in April you tagged the above article for notability. Nothing much seems to have come of it, so I wonder if you feel the tag should be removed - or replaced by a "wikify" template?LessHeard vanU 20:03, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Well, since nothing's come of it, then it should probably be put through AfD -- the idea of the notability template is that it notifies the editors that the article doesn't communicate its importance well, and allows them the opportunity to rectify that. Since no one has done so, it suggests to be that this professor isn't notable and that his article should be deleted. Removing the tag or adding a {{wikify}} won't really help it conform to the inclusion guidelines. I'll go ahead and put it through AfD if you have no objections. Kane5187 20:07, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Fine by me. Thanks for responding so quickly.LessHeard vanU 20:22, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

--Allen3 ^talk 12:14, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:SôberBand.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 06:41, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:TheSoviettes.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 18:39, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

KGOs edits on this page were awful. Again, I reverted them. The page is simply unreadable. Please examine yourself —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.139.0.12 (talk • contribs) 17:29, November 14, 2006

Those edits were atrocious. Do we have writing standards here or what? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.139.0.12 (talk • contribs) 00:59, November 16, 2006

If you wish to make contributions to Wikipedia, PLEASE PROOFREAD THEM CAREFULLY, both for grammatical errors and clarity. People use this encyclopedia for research. We really do try to maintain high standards here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.139.0.12 (talk • contribs) 07:48, November 17, 2006

"Grammaticality" is not a word found in any English dictionary. Please cease using this word in Wikipedia. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.139.0.12 (talk • contribs) 12:20, November 17, 2006

Thanks for uploading Image:Tubestock.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Haha. On Ralph Ignatowski, I copyedited it, slapped an uncategorized tag on it, and then went off to do something else. Then I realize that I've messed up the headers, so I go back to edit it. At the very end, I saw a bunch more categories - where did they come from? It ends up that you snuck in there in the three-minute timespan to add some categories and remove the tag. Now that was just awesome. Hbdragon88 07:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

What original research, you did not mention any on the talk page and having based this article on the cited articles, including the likes of Salon.com and TIME i have removed it.Qrc2006 02:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Claims of notability were not cited with reliable sources. Article was a recreation, as you clearly saw in the link you posted on my page, I was the fourth admin to delete this article. You can take it to WP:DRV, but see WP:SNOW. User:Zoe|(talk) 06:07, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

I've commented on this on Zoe's talk page FYI  Glen  08:54, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

I've now posted this for others to review as I feel it was completely out of process, feel free to comment here  Glen  16:30, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Pornotube has been recreated. I realise its not your newer version with the additional references at PornoTube, however, I would just paste your newer one over top of the current rather than pushing for the other as well at this stage. Sound good?  Glen  22:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! By the way, I noticed that you prod-ed Harvard Din & Tonics, Raagapella, Tonal Ecstasy, and the Smiffenpoofs. I previously prod-ed those articles and the tags were removed. I was going to give them a week or so to get citations before nominating them for deletion. However, since the {{prod}} has been contested once, you should just nominate them directly, if you want to get rid of them faster. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 18:29, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

The rest of my prods went through so now we're down to 36 a cappella articles (with about a dozen pendings afds). Sounds about right (it was over a hundred when I first found that category months ago). Any, I thought I'd ask you to take another look at your nomination on the Smiffenpoofs. JDoorjam found a book that confirms they are the oldest women's group in the country. savid@n 02:40, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:SlipperyWhenIII.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 02:15, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Great work on this. This article has become much more solid because of your efforts. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 22:35, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Dylan, thanks a lot for your contributions to the Mandoulides Schools article. If you could run a NPOV/references check I'd be grateful. thatha 16:18, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:AshleyJensen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 20:15, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Can you take a peek at British Museum. I don't think that objects in the museum should be described as "famous". It is an empty term, the best way to declare an abject famous is to have its own article in Wikipedia. Take a peek and let me know what you think. You can see in the history I have been removing the term, but a group opposes me. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 00:08, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks and props for your recent level-headed discussion and contributions on this article. schi ^talk 21:05, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:AlienAntFarm.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 01:17, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome. I think I'll mainly be adding photos here and there. --Miles 18:35, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

I thought you were referring to the news article in the ref tag, not the linked article for Steve Kelley. I now see what you mean. But is it policy that every linked person must have an article dedicated to him? Almost all do, but I do see one (Thomas Crown) in the fiction section, that doesn't. User:rhsatrhs

Thanks again. I've created the Steve Kelley (cartoonist) article. (Which you know, because you've done some cleanup already.) I've also found that the same link error had already existed on the List of editorial cartoonists page, and I have corrected it. Although the article is very brief, there are cartoonists on that list that have even less detail in their articles. I'm comfortable with it for now, but if I can find more detail and/or objective analysis/criticism of Kelley's work I'll be sure to add it. User:rhsatrhs

--Carabinieri 20:14, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

• Just wanted to say that I'm one of the few people with Kegg as my surname, and have only just found out about the great Keggy the Kegg, or Keggmeister. Check out my labour of love, List of iconic drinkers Cheers!. Gareth E Kegg 20:24, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for bringing attention to the sorry state of the Institute Professor article. I remodeled the page based upon Dartmouth College alumni over the past few weeks and it was promoted to featured list today. Madcoverboy 13:00, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

I was wondering exactly what is notable of this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Middle_Tennessee_Blue_Raiders_football_team that the New Hampshire page lacked.

Perhaps your call for deletion of the New Hampshire page was of a personal grudge cause UNH kicks Dartmouth's ass EVERY YEAR! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tjliles (talk • contribs) 17:40, 5 May 2007 (UTC).

I have tagged Image:Electric_Six_band.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 07:10, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:VederaBand.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 02:03, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:ElectricSix DanceCommander.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:32, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:ElectricSix GayBar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:32, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:ElectricSix RadioGaGa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:32, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:ElectricSix Rockshow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:39, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Goldfinger-Darrin'sCoconutAss.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:31, 1 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 09:31, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Goldfinger-StompingGroung.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:32, 1 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 09:32, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Families Need Fathers logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Riana ⁂ 09:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes!! Thanks for taking the time to upload that hoard of pictures! I've begun to incorporate some relevant ones, and will do more over the next few days.-DMCer 08:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

I have tagged Image:BillAyersMugshot.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 14:48, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

  Thanks for uploading Image:GarminForerunner201.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:19, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

I have tagged Image:GarminForerunner201.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast 21:50, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

I have requested a peer review for List of Alpha Phi Alpha brothers. I modeled the list after the Dartmouth Alumni list and would appreciate if you could provide some feedback. thank you.--Ccson 16:01, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

I have tagged Image:GregGiraldo.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast 16:10, 24 July 2007 (UTC)