KevinOKeeffe

Here are some links I thought useful:

• Wikipedia:Tutorial
• Wikipedia:Help desk
• M:Foundation issues
• Wikipedia:Policy Library
• Wikipedia:Utilities
• Wikipedia:Cite your sources
• Wikipedia:Verifiability
• Wikipedia:Wikiquette
• Wikipedia:Civility
• Wikipedia:Conflict resolution
• Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
• Wikipedia:Pages needing attention
• Wikipedia:Peer review
• Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
• Wikipedia:Brilliant prose
• Wikipedia:Featured pictures
• Wikipedia:Boilerplate text
• Wikipedia:Current polls
• Wikipedia:Mailing lists
• Wikipedia:IRC channel

Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. Wikipedia:About, Wikipedia:Help desk, and Wikipedia:Village pump are also a place to go for answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Be Bold!

Sam Spade (talk · contribs) 12:00, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Hi. I notice that you've recently added {{FascismProject}} to some articles. That template is actually intended for talk pages, not the articles themselves. I've moved the template from White nationalism to Talk:White nationalism; you might want to do the same for the other articles. Cheers, CWC(talk) 15:24, 23 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello again. I've just removed the template from Socialist Reich Party and Otto Ernst Remer. Thanks for your contributions. CWC(talk) 23:55, 24 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've corrected your redirect three times already - stop messing about. Stephenb (Talk) 16:58, 12 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

I had already corrected it, and you could learn how to do redirects by looking at the edit history Stephenb (Talk) 08:02, 13 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Just a reminder: at the moment Valley of the Minotaur lacks any citations or other evidence of notability. Absent third party evidence that the game existed, the article could be challenged and deleted. While Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) isn't official, it's none-the-less likely to be the standard the article would be held to. Good luck! — Alan De Smet | Talk 03:00, 25 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Howdy. I know that it has been a few days, but do you have a reference for this:

"Prior to the entry of ex-San Fracisco Mayor (later U.S. Senator) Dianne Feinstein, there was an effort by party leaders to persuade James Garner to seek the 1990 Democratic nomination for Governor of California."

I am trying to clean up cite tags.

Thanks. ~ WikiDon (talk) 02:28, 31 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

GARNER ASKED TO RUN FOR GOVERNOR - BUT ACTOR DECLINES TO FOLLOW IN REAGAN'S PATH

Daily News of Los Angeles (CA) - July 25, 1989 Author: PATRICK McGREEVY Daily News Staff Writer

Forget John Van De Kamp and Dianne Feinstein - for the Democrats to win next year's governor's race against Sen. Pete Wilson, they need a guy like actor James Garner , says state Sen. Herschel Rosenthal.

Rosenthal, D-Los Angeles, said Monday that he is so convinced that his party's gubernatorial hopefuls cannot win that he attempted to recruit former Rockford Files" star and beef spokesman James Garner .

"He said, 'I'm making $6 million dollars a year, what do I need that for?' or words to that effect," Rosenthal recalled.

Garner was not available for comment, but his publicist, Pat Kingsley, said that the actor didn't feel comfortable cast in the role of politician.

"It is true, in fact, he was approached, but he declined," Kingsley said. "He doesn't feel politics is the right field for him."

Rosenthal said during a lunch with Daily News reporters and editors Monday that actor was approached because his face is familiar to millions of television viewers who saw him in shows, including "The Rockford Files" and the western series "Maverick."

Noting that Garner looked good on a horse, Rosenthal admitted taking a note from the playbook of the Republicans, who successfully ran a cowboy-actor named Ronald Reagan for governor in 1967.

"Everybody knows him," the senator said of Garner, who has been active in various environmental causes in the past.

Rosenthal said he launched his search for a "non-politician" candidate representing the Democratic Party after he concluded that neither Attorney General John Van de Kamp nor former San Francisco Mayor Dianne Feinstein can beat Republican U.S. Sen. Pete Wilson for governor next year.

Most polls show Feinstein and Van de Kamp as the top two candidates for the Democratic primary election next June.

"This state will elect blacks for mayor and women for secretary (of state) but it's not going to elect either one of them for governor," Rosenthal said regarding Feinstein's candidacy.

Rosenthal was equally blunt about Van de Kamp's chances.

"In my opinion, Van de Kamp can't win. He doesn't get anybody excited. You can fall asleep listening to him," said Rosenthal, a 15-year veteran of state office.

A third potential Democratic candidate, State Controller Gray Davis, will decide against running for governor based on his low standing in the polls, Rosenthal predicted.

The senator also said the public is put to sleep by the leading Republican candidate for governor, U.S. Senator Pete Wilson.

Caption: photo James Garner Doesn't feel right for the part

Hi there!  :)

As someone who's worked on D&D and/or RPG articles before, I'm inviting you to participate in our goal to both improve articles that have been selected to be placed in the next Wikipedia DVD release, as well as nominate more to be selected for this project. Please see the WikiProject D&D talk page for more details. :) BOZ (talk) 04:16, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 14:18, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I’ve been working on a lot of ‘’Dungeons & Dragons’’ articles lately and saw that you were a member of WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons), and am inviting you to rejoin Wikipedia’s D&D group. I've been hard at work removing tags placed inappropriately on D&D articles, as well as modifying articles to remove tags that were placed legitimately. In addition, I have been compiling related articles together so that the articles are longer, making it easier to remove tags and to have short articles on lesser topics by just putting it into another appropriate article (links to such compiled articles can be found on my userpage). Check out the project here , and ask any questions that you may have here. Thank you for your time. Drilnoth (talk) 20:48, 7 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi there. I left you a comment on the Maine Coon GA review page. Mind taking a look and letting me know? Thanks. – Ms. Sarita ^Confer 00:55, 31 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please see {{AmericanDomesticTerrorism}} for your list, smaller templates work better :) Sherurcij ^{(speaker for the dead)} 02:59, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nice template, thanks. Here's a question - if Ted Kaczynski is included, shouldn't George Metesky be on it somewhere as well? Not sure how, maybe generalize the Unabomber tag a bit more? Cheers, CliffC (talk) 15:19, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Have to disagree that this is a nice template, I think it's harmful and probably needs to be deleted. Your inclusions are rather arbitrary, and I'd appreciate it if you stopped templating a ton of articles with this thing. Many of the people you have included in this are alive and utterly dispute the notion that they are "terrorists." We have strict rules for how we deal with articles about living people and this template opens us to some serious problems in that respect. For example Ashanti Alston was convicted of armed robbery, not terrorism, and the article about him mentions nothing about terrorism whatsoever. The article claims he "is a widely sought after speaker and lecturer on the left," and now anyone who goes to read about him before booking him as a speaker will see him as associated with terrorism. He'd have pretty good cause to sue Wikipedia for that, and obviously this is not a trivial issue for someone like him or for Wikipedia.

At the very least please stop adding this template, and I'd appreciate it if you removed it from biographies of living people for the time being. You should not so lightly label people "terrorist" on one of the most widely read sites on the internet, particularly since the word "terrorist" is so heavily disputed. I think I'm going to put this template up for deletion so we can discuss this more at that point, but I don't want you to do any more damage in the mean time.--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 17:40, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ashanti Alston was a member of the Black Liberation Army, which was a terrorist organization (I wonder if the term "guerrilla" might not describe it more accurately, but be that as it may, our society no longer chooses to make much of a distinction between "guerrillas" and "terrorists"). And he committed one or more violent felonies (armed robbery) in service to its agenda. For that matter, even an entirely peaceful member of a terrorist organization is still, within the context of his or her activities in support of that organization, operating to promote terrorism, and thus can be reasonably construed as "a terrorist."

I understand that many leftist terrorists from the 1960s and 70s have been designated as rehabilitated, and allowed to operate within polite society much as if they never did anything wrong (this is of course true ONLY of those who had the good fortune to be on the left, rather than the right), and that the friends & supporters of such ex-terrorists do not care to have the terrorist past of such persons brought up in the present context. Never-the-less, this is an encyclopedia, and encyclopedias are not ideally supposed to be in the business of whitewashing history. Interestingly, the only criminal activities member of the Aryan Republican Army were ever formally accused of were the armed robbery of 22 banks, yet their status as "terrorists" is probably never going to be in dispute by either of us, or much of anyone else. But certain individuals who engaged in terrorism during the 60s and 70s are now regarded as essentially well-intentioned, and thus it is seen as unfair to note the reality of what they did. The basis upon which such a line of reasoning can be brought into conformity with a NPOV policy, however, remains elusive. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 22:26, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Just for the record and to avoid too much side chatter at the TfD debate, this has nothing to do with politics. I watchlist the Mark Rudd page so I first noted the template there, but I don't think any of these groups or individuals should have a template like this. While my politics are very much of the left and while I'm pretty damn far from being a racist much less a white supremacist, believe it or not I don't think the Aryan Republican Army should be labeled "terrorist" in their articles (thus I changed that), again per the guideline at WP:TERRORIST. I'm not sure you've thought through all the implications of being so cavalier about labeling living people terrorists on a web site as widely read as this one. We have to be very, very careful about this kind of thing which is why BLP is such an endlessly debated issue (some have gone so far as to propose deleting all biographical articles of living people to avoid possible legal trouble, though I completely disagree with that). We don't whitewash the truth at Wikipedia, obviously, but we also have NPOV as a core policy and thus avoid intrinsically non-neutral and loaded words like "terrorist," especially on bio articles. Finally, your suggestion that "our society no longer chooses to make much of a distinction between "guerrillas" and "terrorists" struck me as a a bit odd and, quite simply, incorrect. --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 01:21, 17 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for uploading File:WilliamACoulter2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for uploading File:WilliamACoulter2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for uploading File:WilliamACoulter2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:WilliamACoulter2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rob (talk) 18:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kevin, in answer to your notes on commons image (here), commons images are used exactly as though the image was on wikipedia. You can link and display images without any concern as to which site they are loaded on - Peripitus (Talk) 10:36, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I found this edit to Trusilvers talkpage; actually yes, your message does breach the guidelines: they can be found at WP:CANVASS. In particular urging people to vote in a particular way (keep, delete) is a no-no. Ironholds (talk) 00:58, 21 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I was on my way here to basically say the same thing. I had no connection to this article whatsoever, and as far as I can remember, no connection to you whatsoever. The unsolicited advertising for people to come !vote on an article is indeed canvassing. Trusilver 02:11, 21 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Video Olympics screenshot1.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:53, 8 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Congo Bongo Atari screenshot1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 17:14, 10 March 2009 (UTC) --— neuro^(talk) 17:14, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Boxing Atari screenshot1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 17:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC) --— neuro^(talk) 17:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Atari Blackjack screenshot1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 17:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC) --— neuro^(talk) 17:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Atari Basketball.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 17:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC) --— neuro^(talk) 17:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Basic Math Atari screenshot1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 17:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC) --— neuro^(talk) 17:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Warlords Atari 2600 screenshot1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 17:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC) --— neuro^(talk) 17:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Texas Chainsaw Massacre Atari 2600 screenshot1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 17:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC) --— neuro^(talk) 17:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Stampede Atari 2600 Activision screenshot1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 17:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC) --— neuro^(talk) 17:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Atari Superman screenshot1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 17:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC) --— neuro^(talk) 17:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Atari Outlaw screenshot1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 17:18, 10 March 2009 (UTC) --— neuro^(talk) 17:18, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Kaboom! Activision screenshot1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 17:18, 10 March 2009 (UTC) --— neuro^(talk) 17:18, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Atari Golf screenshot1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 17:18, 10 March 2009 (UTC) --— neuro^(talk) 17:18, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Fishing Derby Activision screenshot1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 17:18, 10 March 2009 (UTC) --— neuro^(talk) 17:18, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Cosmic Ark Imagic 2600 screenshot1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 17:18, 10 March 2009 (UTC) --— neuro^(talk) 17:18, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Atari Bowling screenshot1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 17:19, 10 March 2009 (UTC) --— neuro^(talk) 17:19, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Barnstorming Activision screenshot1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 17:19, 10 March 2009 (UTC) --— neuro^(talk) 17:19, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Atlantis Imagic screenshot.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 17:19, 10 March 2009 (UTC) --— neuro^(talk) 17:19, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:3D Tic Tac Toe screenshot1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 17:19, 10 March 2009 (UTC) --— neuro^(talk) 17:19, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Video Olympics screenshot1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 17:20, 10 March 2009 (UTC) --— neuro^(talk) 17:20, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Slot Racers screenshot1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 17:20, 10 March 2009 (UTC) --— neuro^(talk) 17:20, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:OilBarons1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 17:20, 10 March 2009 (UTC) --— neuro^(talk) 17:20, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Bank Heist Atari 2600 screenshot1.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 00:51, 17 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Cookie Monster Munch Atari 2600 screenshot1.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:39, 17 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your comment here was not in keeping with the notion of assuming good faith. Civility helps make this place work better. Thanks. Taroaldo (talk) 07:50, 20 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Oil Baron Epyx Commodore 64 screenshot1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading.STBotI (talk) 03:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Good day. I see that you have uploaded a number of images to Wikipedia. First off, thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, there are some guidelines that we need to follow with copyrighted images. Specifically, you need to add a source for the image (a link to a website will do), a copyright tag (there are some listed at WP:ICT), and a rationale explaining why we can use a copyrighted image (explained at WP:NFURG). I see that your images fail to include one of these. Please stop uploading images and address the concerns listed above. If you need assistance, you can ask at the help desk. If you do not fix these images, and you continue to make bad uploads, you will be blocked and your images will be deleted. Thanks for your contributions! STBotI (talk) 03:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Replies have been made at the help desk. If the problem is solved, please place {{resolved}} ~~~~ at the top of the section. Thank you, ZooFari 21:17, 9 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I did this yesterday, and it was very easy to do, but I can't seem to duplicate it. Its very frustrating. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 12:21, 4 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Try this tool which shows the articles you've created. Not sure if this is what you were looking for, but you can access this from your contributions page. The link is at the bottom of the page. Cheers. Chamal ^talk 12:55, 4 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

If your acount is set up (in preferences) to add every page you edit to your watchlist, an alphabetical list is available by clicking My watchlist > View and edit watchlist. --Kateshortforbob 16:36, 4 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

You can also see your most edited articles using this tool to see your most edited articles, but that's the closest tool of which I'm aware. If you do remember one that lists every page, let me know. hmwithτ 20:53, 4 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please stop linking years in this article and please read WP:MOS regarding linking of months, days and years. I have reverted, again, your edit where you linked years on this article. Thank you. - ℅ ✰ALLST☆R✰ ^echo 18:23, 18 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

My apologies. I missed the second edit you made. Cheers. - ℅ ✰ALLST☆R✰ ^echo 18:36, 18 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Atari Haunted House screenshot1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 14:30, 5 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Also File:3D Tic Tac Toe screenshot1.png. Please let me know if you need help or have any questions. —Bkell (talk) 14:35, 5 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kevin, I've unfortunately had to temporarily remove your statement from your candidacy, as it exceeded the maximum length; statements must be limited to 1200 characters per the rules, to ensure both fairness and to allow for effective and efficient translation. Your original statement is still in the history of the page; I encourage you to overwrite my temporary message with a statement which is less than 1200 characters.

For the Election Committee,
Daniel (talk) 14:20, 8 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi KevinOKeeffe,
On behalf of Wikivoices, a community podcast based on the English Wikipedia, I would like to invite you (and all the other Board of Trustees candidates) to a round table interview on Skype to be held at 10:00:00 p.m. Friday July 24, 2009 in UTC. The format of this interview will be question-answer style whereby interested members of the community will pose questions to one or all of the candidates involved. If you would like any further information about the process or Skype, please contact Durova or myself on the English Wikipedia. Please be advised that spaces are limited and the sign up page can be found here. We look forward to your attendence at this event. Cheers   «l| Promethean ™|l»  (talk) 05:48, 18 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Just as a clarification regarding your comments on your board questions page. We generally don't regard it as productive to engage with Gregory Kohs directly as he will simply bait-and-switch from one claim to the next. But since you seem to have been persuaded of the belief that the Wikimedia Foundation spends 31.6% of its expenditures on program services, I wanted to quickly correct the record.

Gregory is actually making a claim deliberately designed to confuse and mislead. He is not counting program service spending against expenditures, he is counting it against revenue. In the fiscal year covered by the Form 990 in question, we counted a three-year $3 million grant commitment of the Sloan Foundation, and we also underspent against our original budget, so revenue is much higher than expenses. The ratio of program spending against all spending is 66.3%.

Moreover, these metrics are highly controversial, and most non-profits provide highly questionable reporting to the IRS on what constitutes "overhead" spending. See Nonprofit Overhead Costs: Breaking the Vicious Cycle of Misleading Reporting, Unrealistic Expectations, and Pressure to Conform by The Bridgespan Group.

By the way, I would also invite you to consult the 2009-10 Annual Plan to get an inside view on how the revenue targets for this fiscal year are constructed. The Q & A may also be helpful.

If you have any questions regarding the above, feel free to contact me on my talk page or via e-mail at erik(at)wikimedia(dot)org.--Eloquence* 18:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Kevin, I invite you to answer a set of questions for the Wikipedia Signpost about your board candidacy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009 Board elections/Kevin Riley O'Keeffe. If you choose to do so, please let me know. I also encourage you to respond by 26 July; interviews with all candidates who respond will be publicized in the 27 July issue of the Signpost.

Faithfully, ragesoss (talk) 18:25, 21 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

You pull out everything in the article that could be construed as a source as they were dead links, then you turn around and prod it? That's what I call bad faith. Better would have been to tag the dead links with {{deadlink}}, then prod it. That way the folks reviewing the prod can see everything and decide then if it should be deleted. Tabercil (talk) 18:30, 22 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

A note that articles that have gone through a previous Afd are not eligible for proposed deletions. You may consider sending this article to a second afd if you feel notability has still not been established. PORNBIO has become more restrictive since the first AfD although there is debate on whether to roll PORNBIO back to where it used to be. See Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(people)#Porn_Awards Morbidthoughts (talk) 19:40, 22 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello KevinOKeeffe, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Ayame Ikehata has been removed. It was removed by Dekkappai with the following edit summary '(Undid revision 303561774 by KevinOKeeffe (talk) invalid prod- already passed AfD)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Dekkappai before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 21:08, 22 July 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)Reply

Follow the same procedure as outlined for the first step, then edit the substituted template directly to link to the (redlink) page you want to redlink. (Something like the same title followed by "(2nd nomination)" or something like that). Then click on that redlink and put your nomination there and then include the page on the AfD list as normal. Let me know if that's too complicated and I'll do it for you. JoshuaZ (talk) 21:30, 22 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Dear KevinOKeeffe, It would seem that I do not have your skype username as of yet, please email it to me ASAP so that things can run as smoothly as possible on the day.   «l| Promethean ™|l»  (talk) 08:44, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kevin. What does the "far right" mean in your opinion?CecilWard (talk) 13:53, 24 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

I removed the prod as the article survived AfD last year as "no consensus". See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maya Ababadjani. Fences&Windows 18:19, 25 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

While it may not actually violate the letter of WP:BLP or WP:NPA, it certainly violates the spirit of both. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 03:41, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

After seeing this, I went ahead and removed your earlier comment myself. Please read WP:TALK. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:23, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

The meme Great X may have played that role in European nationalism, but do you have a source for Portugal? And besides, when similar expressions were used, they did not refer to the union of Portugal and Galicia, as stated in the article, but to the whole of the Portuguese Empire. The article remains unsourced and I consider it to be OR. The Ogre (talk) 15:16, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Kevin: As a responsible editor, it is incumbent on you to examine the facts before you dismiss content out of hand and arbitrarily expunge it. You have deleted very well-referenced scientific material (semen article) that may also be found on other Wikipedia pages unmolested. Just because something strikes you as "absurd" does not mean that it really is! Study it out please, and you may learn a few things...JGabbard (talk) 14:46, 2 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

In point of fact, some of the alternative uses for semen may actually be medically efficacious. But they aren't really employed in general practice. And I suspect they were noted more as part of a semen fetish, than as part of bona fide research into actual alternative uses to which semen is put. There's a reason you won't find an "alternative uses of semen" section in the Encyclopedia Britanica, and it ain't due to a shortage of paper. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 08:47, 3 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Kevin: The veracity and relative significance of facts are not predicated upon the suspected motives of those who state them. Also, it may be said that $2 bills "aren't really employed in general practice," but the lack of prevalence of their use in no way impugns their validity as currency. You need to relinquish your personal bias against the subject matter itself. Until such time as you have proven the references and research on each individual point to be bogus, the material should remain unvandalized.JGabbard (talk) 13:53, 3 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

No "vandalism" has taken place. I have simply removed quasi-pornographic, degenerate filth that has no place in an encyclopedia. It should also be noted that I didn't check all your sources, but the ones I saw didn't appear notable. I'm sure most of the others wouldn't as well, since reputable publications seldom publish on such inane and perverse topics as semen ingestion. I think Wikipedia should follow their example, and refuse to include such material here as well. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 13:58, 3 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Kevin: Your cursory review of references is insufficient grounds for this futile edit war, which is a waste of both your time and mine. Honest and frank discussion, however, can be quite fruitful. However, you must first have something to discuss. Please have an open mind and take some time to consider the material presented in the various references, all of which have passed the test on other Wiki pages. Please understand, I have zero interest in advancing prurient concerns, but only the simple facts of health. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JGabbard (talk • contribs) 20:44, 3 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

You've added that degeneracy to other articles as well?!? Saints, preserve us! KevinOKeeffe (talk) 23:58, 3 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello KevinOKeeffe, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD templates you added to a number of articles were removed:

• PROD removed from Lorissa McComas, by User:Chuthya, with summary '(Undid revision 304799882 by KevinOKeeffe (talk) asserts notability)'
• PROD removed from Natasha Nice, by User:Chuthya, with summary '(Undid revision 304800549 by KevinOKeeffe (talk) asserts notability)'
• PROD removed from Veronica Sage, by User:Chuthya, with summary '(Undid revision 304804883 by KevinOKeeffe (talk) asserts notability)'

Please consider discussing your concerns with the relevant users before pursuing deletion further. If you still think the articles should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may send them to WP:AfD for community discussion. Thank you - SDPatrolBot (talk) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)

KevinOKeeffe, this really needs to be discussed at the talk page, not through edit-warring. You're getting close to the 3RR limit, and there hasn't been any talk yet. I've got to head off, but if nothing's been started when I'm back online, I'll try to start something. Please though, consider this a warning for the edit-warring, and let's talk about the changes. Ravensfire2002 (talk) 00:12, 4 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've blocked you for 24h for edit warring and POV pushing there. Probably 3RR too, but I don't absolutely assert that William M. Connolley (talk) 22:04, 4 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello KevinOKeeffe, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Franchezca Valentina has been removed. It was removed by Mardaloop with the following edit summary '(remove prod, 70 movie credits and 2 award nominations make her notable)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Mardaloop before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 20:31, 5 August 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)Reply

I was googling my name and saw your comment on WR that I was probably Jewish. You are correct that my name is, but neither of my parents are, and I was raised Christian, and proudly remain as such. Names can deceive. I think I'm mostly Scottish and Irish. Just to clear it up.--CastAStone/^{/₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€} 22:17, 6 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nice platform! DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 03:06, 9 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well, it might or it might not. At least one person has suggested merging it back, so we'll see... Exploding Boy (talk) 04:58, 9 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have arrived here as I wished to know more about the people who are standing for election to trusteeship. I did not wish to prejudge you by your political statement. I am bothered by the fact that though you talk about freedom of speech, it seems that you wish to limit the right of expression of others. All the best neverthelessYogesh Khandke (talk) 18:08, 9 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'm not precisely certain what causes you to arrive at such a conclusion, but I would be hesitant to regard it as an accurate characterization, to say the least. If you are referencing my efforts to enforce Wikipedia's own policies with regards to Notability, in so far as articles about minor, trivial adult film performers are concerned, then that is not a freedom of speech issue, but rather as issue about what constitutes an encyclopedia. I won't trouble you with what an encyclopedia is, but rather I will simply note that one of the things an encyclopedia is not, is a compendium of every jot & tiddle about the adult entertainment, ahem, "industry." I think most reasonable people understand that implicitly. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 02:52, 10 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your deletion of the article about Maya Ababadjani is a complete mistake. She appeared in many Danish films and was one one of the most discussed Danish porn models of her generation, with many articles in daily newspapers, periodicals etc. The notable film journal Ekko, for example, published an article on her in its September 2004 issue, here is the online version: Helt almindelig og alligevel ikke. --Minutae (talk) 10:38, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

There is a dispute [1] about the publication of WikiVoices #45 of which you were a particapant. Do you have any comments to add about how this matter has been handled? 99.150.255.75 (talk) 04:18, 27 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello Kevin, the above single-purpose IP started contributing to that ANI discussion (which was not about our Wikivoices discussion at all) in order to cause confusion. It spammed the talk pages of a dozen people who were related to the interview, including mine... once I figured out that the ANI discussion was not in fact related to that event, I reverted the talkpage spam. Sorry for any confusion. If you want to discuss the Wikivoices episode (which I am also quite miffed isn't public yet) the right place to do so is at Wikipedia talk:Wikivoices#WMF_Board_candidates_session. Cheers, +sj+ 22:13, 27 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

OK, well, that's cool. I didn't really care for the way you went about it, but it doesn't seem malicious or anything, so no problem. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 13:59, 7 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Just the impression I'm getting from your user page and edits. 76.105.211.28 (talk) 04:09, 16 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

LOL, no, I do not believe homosexuals should be executed. The fact that the anti-homosexual "marriage" userbox, and the pro-capital punishment userbox, appear next to each other, is entirely coincidental (I pretty much posted the political ones in the order I found them). But thanks for the laugh! KevinOKeeffe (talk) 19:39, 16 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Richard Thacker Morris requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 02:40, 6 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

The category you wrote, Category:California cryptids, is uncategorized. Please help improve it by adding it to one or more categories, so it may be associated with related categories. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:06, 8 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello - For future reference you might want to take a look at this category's current parent cats. I just removed all 6 of the original parent cats that you had given it, because they were all identical (and thus redundant) to the parents for Category:Cryptids -- which is itself the primary parent cat for Category:California cryptids. Strangely, you didn't use that category as a parent cat, but another editor thought to add it. Anyway, I hope this will give you some insight into the proper way to set up parent cats for new categories. Cgingold (talk) 23:22, 19 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Do you have a source giving Rio Téodoro as an official name for the Roosevelt River? The U.S Board of Geographic Names (http://geonames.usgs.gov/) uses Rio Roosevelt and doesn't even list Téodoro as an alternate name. Brazilian government maps all use Rio Roosevelt as well as far as I can tell. I haven't found any map that labels it as Rio Téodoro, even those labeled in Portuguese (though one National Geographic atlas spells it out as Theodore Roosevelt River). Kmusser (talk) 13:37, 9 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

The article (Rio Téodoro) itself claims that "Rio Téodoro" is the official name of the river (and no, I did not add that text to the article myself), and that seemed accurate to me, since on the occasions where I've read about it, "Rio Téodoro" was the only name I'd ever come across for it. Since I didn't actually make the claim that was the correct name (but rather merely normalized the usage across several articles), I didn't have a source for that claim at hand, but perhaps I should try to find one later on today (after I've finished with another article I'm almost through with at present, and then it will be time to sleep). KevinOKeeffe (talk) 13:45, 9 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ok, found that was added recently by an anon user, going to leave the same question on their page and the article talk page in the hopes that they see it. If true I'm ok with the renaming, but I'm a little suspicious since it conflicts with Brazilian maps. Kmusser (talk) 15:49, 9 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

My recent edits to the lead section of the National-Anarchism article were a result of discussions on the Talk:National-Anarchism. I've have therefore restored my edits and I suggest you join the discussion rather than start an edit war. --Loremaster (talk) 13:06, 8 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Having examined the contents of the Talk page in question, I do not see any evidence for the existence of a consensus in favor of your perspective with respect to the appropriate slant of the National-Anarchism article, hence I shall be inclined to disregard such misleading remarks from you in the future. It clear you're just editing the article the way you personally prefer it to be edited, and were trying to persuade me of a consensus behind your edits, which its very difficult to believe you were being sincere about. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 12:45, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Just a note - the edit you made to the talkpage of this article recently - which I have revision deleted - was seriously not a good idea. WP:BLP applies to talk pages as well as articles - see WP:BLPTALK - and such edits are considered vandalism. Thanks, Black Kite (t) (c) 22:29, 8 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I know, I kinda went into troll mode that day (which I obviously shouldn't have done, and which really isn't characteristic of my activities here), because I was so tired of some other person mentioning that character in an annoying context (at another site). Although I didn't realize that posting goofy comments on a Talk page constituted vandalism. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 23:27, 8 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. See here. Thank you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 22:31, 8 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. MBisanz ^talk 02:16, 20 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have nominated The Phora, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Phora (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Reconsider! 11:55, 12 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Hey there KevinOKeeffe, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:KevinOKeeffe/ThePhora. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of files removed today here.

• Shut off the bot here.

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 14 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Tila Tequila. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Irn (talk) 22:11, 17 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi, just dropping you a note about NAMBLA-gate. Have you seen these: [2] [3] [4]? I think they might be RS. You may find this interesting, too. Happy days! Lionel (talk) 20:50, 26 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:ThePhora1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:50, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Comrade Sandalio. Since you had some involvement with the Comrade Sandalio redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Bridgeplayer (talk) 14:59, 5 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

A discussion has begun about whether the article American Third Position Party, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Third Position Party until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --MelanieN (talk) 04:32, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I'm leaving you this message because you're listed as a Wikipedian in Alabama. The Wikipedia Ambassador Program is currently looking for Campus Ambassadors to help with Wikipedia assignments at Troy University, which will be participating in the Public Policy Initiative for the Spring 2011 semester. The role of Campus Ambassadors will be to provide face-to-face training and support for students on Wikipedia-related skills (how to edit articles, how to add references, etc.). This includes doing in-class presentations, running workshops and labs, possibly holding office hours, and in general providing in-person mentorship for students.

Prior Wikipedia skills are not required for the role, as training will be provided for all Campus Ambassadors (although, of course, being an experienced editor is a plus).

I know Alabama is a big state, but if you happen to live near Troy and you are interested in being a Wikipedia Campus Ambassador, or know someone else from Troy who might be, please email me or leave a message on my talk page.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 16:08, 6 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on American Third Position Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Lenerd (talk) 22:06, 23 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

How can one be an anarchist and against statism but at the same time be in support of the state being allowed to decide whether or not people can get married or have abortions?

Doesn't make much sense, especially not coming from an individual claiming to have an IQ of 140. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.216.218.247 (talk) 10:28, 26 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I should think one would scarcely require an IQ of 140 to be able to understand an elementary concept such as, for example, my support for maintaining the authentic definition of marriage (as well as protecting human life in its gestational stage). You know, within the context of the regime that is actually in power today (and likely to remain so for the foreseeable future). KevinOKeeffe (talk) 01:55, 27 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Well, it depends on how you view it with with regards to marriage. I am not a supporter of forcing a religious group to legalize marrying same-sex couples.

However, I am also not a supporter of a government/state forbidding a faith from marrying same-sex couples if they wish to do so.

If you understand what I mean, English isn't my native language so I sometimes fumble with how to express myself in it.

--80.216.218.247 (talk) 15:11, 29 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Kevin. Maybe you might be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism. I saw that you did a lot of useful work in articles about right-wing activism and NPOV issues. --Dezidor (talk) 22:02, 16 February 2011 (UTC) (user who made photo of Ivo Pešák)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:AlternativeRight1a.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

• Ever feel like you're editing in a vacuum, and long for some camaraderie?
• Do you want to improve an article and put a Featured Article star on your userpage but don't know how to get started?
• Want to be part of a cohesive, committed team working together to improve conservatism one article at a time?

If you're interested in having lots of fun and working with great editors, click here and make history. We're now taking nominations. Lionelt (talk) 01:26, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Compare your citation in further reading to the citation style in the article. Fifelfoo (talk) 01:21, 12 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Compare your citation in further reading to the citation style in the article. Fifelfoo (talk) 01:23, 12 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'm quite confident what I have done is correct. If a given external link is associated with both an author and a publication for which there are articles here, it is in keeping with the principle of "building the web," to hyperlink those two respective articles, in accordance with the Manual of Style. There is every advantage in so doing, and your concerns to the effect that this is somehow in apparent conflict with "the citation style in the article," is frankly not relevant, as nothing is being "cited" within the External links section of the article in question.

Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(linking)#Principles KevinOKeeffe (talk) 01:58, 12 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

It is a reference to an external object with an author, title, publisher. It should conform to the referencing styles in the article which are clearly Author Title Publisher in terms of ordering. Stop putting the author after the title. Fifelfoo (talk) 08:37, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please note that I've just raised the matter on WP:ANI for review. The thread is here. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 17:10, 26 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Note: I have accepted this request, but it is a request for block amendment rather than an unblock.

Each AFD goes into a separate page. I've moved yours. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libertarian National Socialist Green Party (2nd nomination). Fix as necessary.   Will Beback  talk  09:43, 7 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I see you've moved List of Nikkatsu Roman Porno films, and edited its content, to change the term "Roman Porno" to something else. Changing it to "Roman pornographic" seems to make no sense, as it would seem to imply some relationship with Rome or the Ancient Romans, which I can see no hint of here.

I wonder if the term "Roman Porno" may be the actual Japanese term for this genre of films, perhaps as a contraction of the English words "pornographic romance" thus also possibly explaining the capital letters in the usage of the term? If so, then the use of the term would actually be encyclopedic, and in that case should be left as-is, and a note added to the article to that effect. Can you please investigate this before making any further edits? -- The Anome (talk) 23:54, 24 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

On review: yes, it's a literal quotation of a Japanese term: see Roman_Porno#Second wave (The Nikkatsu Roman Porno era 1971–1982). I'll therefore roll back your edits, as per my rationale above. -- The Anome (talk) 00:00, 25 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for the misunderstanding. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 00:03, 25 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

As Category:2000s horror films is "A list of horror films originally released in the 2000s." with 2000s linked to 2000s (decade) ("a decade that started on January 1, 2000 and ended on December 31, 2009."), I have reverted your edit. Yes, 2010 is the last year of the first decade of the 21st century, but that is not what we are talking about. The "1990s", for example, do not include 2000 and do include 1990. - SummerPhD (talk) 13:54, 22 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Revolutionary Communist Party, USA are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 01:25, 23 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Talk:Revolutionary Communist Party, USA, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 01:26, 23 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

We're in a bit of a pickle in the Wagner discussion page. The issues concerns Social class (sociology) and the phrase supposedly common Germanic past and has now been dismissed by some editors as inconsequential. Furthermore, the name Other interpretations in the article dismisses the general review and broader Wagner analysis to a subcategory under Controversies (mainly the topic of anti-Semitism). Please help. Just take fast look and maybe help in the balancing act. Thank you

• In his own era he furthermore provided the newly emerged middle class with a medium to transfer its familial and political conflicts into a myth of supposedly common Germanic past.

(In the introduction, removed as non consequential)

User:Major Torp (talk) 20:00, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

User:KevinOKeeffe/ThePhora, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:KevinOKeeffe/ThePhora and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:KevinOKeeffe/ThePhora during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Centrepull (talk) 10:43, 25 December 2011 (UTC) ==Reply

Hi. When you recently edited Miguel Serrano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Planet Earth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 17 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I saw the edit you made here[5]. This is to inform you it is incorrect. Per WP:ORDER, The notes or references section of an article comes before the external links section, not after....William 19:04, 4 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

I saw your edit summary on Thomas E. Dewey and I don't think you are correct that Dewey's term as Governor of New York ended in 1955 rather than 1954. The terms of Governors of New York begin on January 1 of an odd-numbered year and end on December 31 of the even-numbered year four years later, so Dewey's term ended on December 31, 1954. See also List of Governors of New York. If you have a source suggesting something different I'd be interested in seeing it. Thanks, Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Porter Sculpture Park may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• 90 in South Dakota|Interstate 90]] in [[Montrose, South Dakota|Montrose]], [[South Dakota]] (about 25 miles west of [[Sioux Falls]], on the eastern edge of [[McCook County, South Dakota|McCook

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:40, 19 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please see MOS:LQ. Wikipedia uses logical punctuation, which means that commas go outside quotation marks. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:19, 24 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 02:14, 13 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:AlternativeRight1a.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:06, 19 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Category:Southern writers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:01, 16 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

I removed your addition of this category. The next step is to discuss it on the article talk page. Not re-revert. Please revert your readdition of the category and discuss. — Neonorange (talk) 17:29, 16 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

A proposal to merge The New Campus Anti-Rape Movement article with the Campus sexual assault article is being discussed at Talk:Campus sexual assault. As you had a number of content edits to the article, I thought you might want to be involved. Carl Henderson (talk) 06:19, 28 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to List of Russian military bases abroad seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 01:39, 24 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Floyd Parker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Floyd Parker until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 03:39, 18 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trenton Stokes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trenton Stokes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 03:43, 18 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:California cryptids, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 02:41, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm TJRC. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Cary Stayner, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 20:32, 7 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Delivered: 11:12, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Delivered: 09:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Cosmic Ark Atari 2600 screenshot1a.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Video Olympics Atari 2600 screenshot1a.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:43, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Barnstorming Atari 2600 screenshot1a.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Blackjack Atari 2600 screenshot1a.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 16 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

You last got this in 2015, so here's another.--Jorm (talk) 17:00, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Doug Weller talk 16:09, 29 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Congo Bongo Atari 2600 screenshot1a.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 28 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Doug Weller talk 13:17, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Doug Weller talk 13:18, 18 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

  User:KevinOKeeffe/Userboxes/National Anarchism, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:KevinOKeeffe/Userboxes/National Anarchism and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:KevinOKeeffe/Userboxes/National Anarchism during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — csc^-1 04:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of neo-Nazi bands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bound for Glory. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to TERF, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. gnu57 23:49, 5 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Zoey Tur, you may be blocked from editing. Rab V (talk) 01:33, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:KevinOKeeffe_transphobic_abuse

For the love of god, what the hell do you think you’re doing and how do you perceive it as appropriate content for an encyclopedia?! Dronebogus (talk) 09:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Dronebogus (talk) 08:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:3-D Tic-Tac-Toe Atari 2600 screenshot1a.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 16 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Activision Boxing Atari 2600 screenshot1a.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 16 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Armor Ambush Atari 2600 screenshot1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 16 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Artiller Duel Atari 2600 screenshot1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 16 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Atlantis Atari 2600 screenshot1a.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 16 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Basketball Atari 2600 screenshot1a.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Bowling Atari 2600 screenshot1a.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).