TheBirdsShedTears

Thanks for your contributions to Rather (surname in Kashmir). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Whpq (talk) 13:37, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Whpq: this is not my article, but i found it randomly and tried to rescue it. TheBirdsShedTears (talk)

Yes, I realize that. I just wanted to inform you as you did make an attempt at improving it and might want to do a bit more so I wanted to let you know it has been draftified. -- Whpq (talk) 13:52, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@TheBirdsShedTears OH YOU ARE THE ONE WHO IS CONSTANTLY IRRATATING FROM EVERYWHERE NA Sarim Wani (talk) 13:43, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please refer to WP:PA before making false accusations. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 13:49, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

bro you took it seriously i thought you were cool from youre user page.. Sarim Wani (talk) 15:05, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please participate in ANI discussion than making fun of others. You may explain your concerns there. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:08, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey TheBirdsShedTears,

I want to sincerely apologize for my actions. I realize that what I said/did came across as bullying and that was never my intention. I made a mistake and I deeply regret it. I value respect and kindness and I know that I didn’t show that in this situation.

Please know that I’m committed to learning from this and doing better moving forward. I hope you can accept my apology. it's just that everywhere I do something I get well help from you so you can see what can go wrong here.

Take care oh also I can't talk there? Sarim Wani (talk) 15:16, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello sir please confirm this article why it is not in use yet Kala321 (talk) 07:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Kala321: It is yet to be reviewed by New page reviewers, a user group dedicated to determine notability criteria of newly created articles. For further information regarding notability, please visit WP:GNG. If you need any assistance regarding your draft or article, your may ask a question at Wikipedia:Teahouse, a friendly place for newcomers. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 08:07, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Help arrange it so it can be ready for articles mainspace. Celinejunior24 (talk) 17:55, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please refer to notability guidelines for a detailed information. If this is your first article, please refer to WP:YFA. You may wish to ask questions at our Q&A hub, a very friendly place for new editors. In case you are associated with the subject in question, please visit WP:COI. If you are writting about yourself, please visit WP:AUTOBIO. Regards TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 18:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button   located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:10, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, TheBirdsShedTears,

I've noticed several times that occasionally your signature just includes your username without a time and date of the comment. Please remember to use FOUR tildes when signing your comments, not three or five. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:12, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Liz: Thanks for the heads-up! I didn't realize I was messing up the signature by not using the right number of tildes. I'll make sure to use four from now on. Appreciate you pointing it out! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 09:54, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi TheBirdsShedTears. Thank you for your work on Roshni Act controversy. Another editor, Dcotos, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work! I would suggest it should be renamed, as the majority of sources referred to it as the Roshni land scam.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 08:15, 18 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Dcotos: Thank you! Since the case is still pending in court, I chose 'controversy' instead of 'scam' to adhere to WP:NPOV. Although not concretely, it appears there is a possibility of the case incident it overlapped by political rivalry in some cases. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 08:26, 18 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@TheBirdsShedTears That makes sense. Thank you. The article is large; it could be a bit shorter and please consider adding more reliable sources. Cheers! Dcotos (talk) 08:54, 18 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@TheBirdsShedTears I don't know If you studied Islam or not but for your kind information I remind you that, we 'muslims' have a special law called 'shariah' in which there's a specific topic on images and paintings. It is agreed by all the prominent scholars of the old and the new era that Images with Faces (Eyes, Nose, Mouth etc.) are 'Haram' which means prohibited, No means No.

and If you're thinking to quote some Wikipedia references of Other personalities with faces then you'll be giving a proof of being an illiterate.

So let me do my work under the Shariah rules and Wikipedia rules too and good luck for your future edits. Itsmeaasifqureshi (talk) 11:23, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Itsmeaasifqureshi:, if you're promoting images you've designed yourself, it might be better to create a blog to showcase your work. Wikipedia has its own guidelines that don't support personal promotion or emotional attachment to content. Please stop engaging in edit warring, as it goes against Wikipedia's collaborative principles. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 12:48, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) Reply

Hi there, when you put a G5 tag on an article, the username to add is the sockmaster, not the sockpuppet. It's not a huge deal, but it saves admins the step of looking up the SPI. -- asilvering (talk) 02:15, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Asilvering: Got it, thanks for the heads-up! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 05:40, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Zakir Ali Zaidi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

— Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:42, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure what you're wanting me to do with the information your sent me via email. You haven't provided any evidence or diffs of disruption and Checkusers can't link IPs to accounts, so there's little I can do there. I suggest you report your concerns via WP:SPI.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:25, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! I will provide diffs at WP:SPI or by email. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 17:52, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Welcome, welcome, welcome TheBirdsShedTears! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Cielquiparle (talk) 13:18, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Zakir Ali Khan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:41, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

I see that you reverted my draftification and wrote I was "disruptive editing" and "misuse of NPP rights". I think that’s a bit excessive since I’m not the only one who believes this fails WP:N. If you truly think it meets WP:N, you could have let it pass through AFC, but it seems you want to avoid that route. No problem, I’ll take it to AFD, though not necessarily right now, as I’m occupied elsewhere. But please AGF and refrain from calling our edits disruptive. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 14:11, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Saqib:, Since we seem to have different views on the notability of this article, it might be better to take it to AfD so the community can decide its fate. I could be wrong about its notability, so I've also left a message on the article's talk page to seek the input of the editor who tagged it. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 14:26, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Like I said, I wasn’t entirely sure about its WP:N either, but when I saw the WP:N tag, I thought we should get it passed through AFC. Because AFC is a better way to preserve an article than taking it to AFD and risking deletion. However, your reversion of my draftification and labeling my edits as disruptive was quite disappointing. But no worries; I’m glad you started the discussion on the article's tp. I might join in later as well. Happy editing! — Saqib (talk I contribs) 14:37, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi TheBirdsShedTears, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:58, 13 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for spotting the copyvio at Draft:North Star of Herschel Island but please; when you find a copyvio, remove the offending material then request revdel. Nthep (talk) 15:14, 15 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Nthep:, Got it, thanks for the heads-up! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:28, 15 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Dear TheBirdsShedTears , Thank you for the editorial feedback on Draft:Anand Reddi. I have made the changes you have requested add more notable referenes, deleted primary referenes and inline website references and also shorted the prose and made it less promotional.

I have also added new editorial feedback from the Treehouse chat:

[7:56:13 AM] <A09> sources however aren't the only problem. I still think it'd be better to shorten the prose to just facts and statements indirectly related to Reddi. backgrounds on certain topics can be linked through other, less specific articles.

[7:57:13 AM] <A09> remove external links from the last prose paragraph and place them in external links section. links in article body should only link to wikipedia pages, everything else goes in a footer

[8:02:38 AM] <A09> I have spotchecked the prose and there is still lots of space to improve, especially as certain phrases sounded very promotional. I suggest you first try to improve these things I have listed above and then resubmit your draft.

[8:02:40 AM] <WhiteAlpaca38> will add this additional feedback Trex32 (talk) 16:43, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello TheBirdsShedTears, I have done the changes you advised, please check it. Thanks for your attention. ColTip (talk) 18:04, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

@ColTip: please consider trimming award section as previously stated. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 18:14, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

You made the right choice to send it to AfD. It seems that no-one has improved it, and it may prove to be unimprovable. Wikipedia is improved either way at the end of the discussion, though I do hate "no consensus' ones. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Timtrent: In some cases, my AfD approach is to improve the article, and this one is no exception. ;) TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 17:51, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

May it bear fruit. If not, may the fallen fruit be composted. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:10, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, when you make a revdel request like at Bimal Das Gupta, make sure to put the revision numbers in the template so the responding admin doesn't have to go hunting for the original problem. Thanks! -- asilvering (talk) 05:28, 29 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the reminder! I've undone the edit and re-submitted with the revision numbers added. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 05:54, 29 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 30 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello TheBirdsShedTears,

Thank you for the comment. I would like to state categorically that I have no relationship with Oyindamola Bello. I only improved on the draft after Wikipedia showed the draft to me. Ethan123n (talk) 15:36, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Ethan123n: Thank you for your clarification. Could you please elaborate on how you came across this draft? TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:40, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

It was after I read a book authored by Waziri Adio, who is a well known Journalist and public servant in Nigeria. I decided to get more information about him but I couldn't get a comprehensive and concise information about him, that led me to search for him on Wikipedia and was told that there was not article in his name and I opted to create a Wikipedia profile for him, it was at this point that i came across the draft by Oyindamola Bello and I decided to improve on the draft.

Thank you. Ethan123n (talk) 17:41, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Ethan123n: Thank you for providing the details. Since this is your first contribution to Wikipedia beyond this draft, I'm interested in understanding the context more clearly. Could you please confirm whether you were specifically invited to work on this draft, or if you discovered it independently during your research? and could you please clarify if you used Wikipedia's internal search to locate the draft or through an invitation link? This will help other reviewers better grasp the full picture. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 18:10, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

It was through sn internal Wikipedia search. I was not invited to work on this article although I edited some Wikipedia articles some year back, 2017 I think but I lost the account when I misplaced my device. I intend to become a regular contributor to Wikipedia as time permit.

Thank you 102.91.92.170 (talk) 18:32, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for sharing these details. Happy editing. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 03:07, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you too! Ethan123n (talk) 10:03, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm glad to see you've recovered from the block. As one of the most experienced South Asian editors I've encountered, your work on Pakistan military topics, especially the Pakistan Navy, has always impressed me with its professionalism, quality, and depth of research. I have a request: could you consider developing an article on the Pakistan Navy Submarine Force? Your expertise and insight would greatly benefit this topic. Thank you for considering my request. Ainty Painty (talk) 07:31, 11 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Ainty Painty: Thanks for your message. I haven't looked into the Pakistan Navy Submarine Force yet, but it seems an interesting topic. I'll do some research, and if it meets the relevant notability criteria, I'd be happy to work on it in the upcoming days. Appreciate the suggestion! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 07:44, 11 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much for taking the time to create the article! Your thorough research and detailed writing have truly elevated this topic and filled a significant gap in coverage. As always, your work showcases professionalism and expertise, and it's a pleasure to see another high-quality contribution to South Asian military topics. Great job, and I look forward to seeing more of your excellent work! Ainty Painty (talk) 15:25, 12 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi TheBirdsShedTears, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede66 01:16, 16 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Schwede66: thank you. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 01:57, 16 December 2024 (UTC)Reply