Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 October 4

< October 3	October 5 >

October 4

File:Ubuntu Studio 8.04.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:37, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:39, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CETO 5 Single Unit Animation.ogv

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:37, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No need for such an unfree animation in these (Wave power & CETO) articles. No convincing rationale given why this unfree animation is highly needed for these articles. Crowsnest (talk) 07:33, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Archimedes pi.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't display Archimedes method for finding pi as set out in accompanying text.Sceptic1954 (talk) 09:06, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Sceptic1954 (talk) 09:34, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Files listed for deletion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy close. No reason for deletion given. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:20, 4 October 2012 (UTC) Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 October 4 if you are interested in preserving them.[reply]

Thank you. "Excusez-moi, qui sa pete?" 12:34, 4 October 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sexuallady (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:This is my moon.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Film poster not required on biography of a person. Fails WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 16:24, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vidu by Asoka Handagama.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Film poster not required on biography article. Fails WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 16:26, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Diyakata Pahana by Asoka Handagama.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot of a film with no significant importance on biography article. Fails WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 16:27, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UCL Alumnus.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:10, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sussex Alumnus.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:10, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Imperial Alumnus.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:10, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DrTBoyle.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned self-photo Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:11, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UCL bw.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:11, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uckers.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:Uckers gameboard graphic.png Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:12, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uci zionist.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value, BLP issues - previously used in section of UC Irvine about that school's antisemitism. The sign on the podium isn't really legible, but it's definitely anti-Zionist. I think it's problematic to be putting someone's photo in a section on antisemitism when we have no idea whether what he was saying was antisemitic, as opposed to anti-zionist. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:14, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uchicago5.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value (official wordmark is apparently this) Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:16, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uclujsquad.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:16, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hollies Stop! Stop! Stop! album cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus, defaulting to keep. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:52, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#3a because there already is another cover: File:Hollies For Certain Because.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 00:00, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The tagged image is the cover for the U.S. release of the album, which has both a different name and a totally different image than the U.K. release, as discussed in the article. Anyone familar with just the U.S. release would not associate it with the U.K. release without the alternate image. The U.S. title and cover was distinctive enough that the Allmusic article about the album lists it separately from the For Certain Because title and cover. -- AyaK (talk) 00:09, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why does it matter if the title or illustration differs? If you already know what the cover looks like, you don't need any illustration in the article. Illustrations are mainly useful for those who don't already know what something looks like, and then it doesn't matter which cover people will see. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:52, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your argument ("Illustrations are mainly useful for those who don't already know what something looks like") is completely at odds with one of the rationales behind fair use law. One reason for being able to use the album cover in the article is that the cover is a primary means of identifying the album. If you're going to make an argument against fair use, at least understand the reasoning behind the law. (By the way, that's why I agree with you in some of your other deletion requests -- because the "limited edition" alternate covers were not a primary means of identification for the album. That's not the situation here.)

If you knew just the Stop! Stop! Stop! cover visual, why would you expect that a cover as different as the For Certain Because cover here was the same as the Stop! Stop! Stop! album, even though the text says it is? Remember, this album was issued in December 1966. There wasn't any market in the U.S. for imports then -- so no one in North America would have any familiarity with the U.K. cover. There's a reason Allmusic, which is the definitive site with regard to music catalogs, has entries on both albums -- and also a reason the album was just reissued as part of a U.S. series with the U.S. cover, even though it already is available with the U.K. cover. Basically, all of the Hollies albums that were released in the U.S. until 1971 contained different songs from their U.K. counterparts except for this one, and all of them used different covers. Even with the discussion of the U.S./Canadian album title Stop! Stop! Stop! in the article, without the cover art, no one (not even a Wikipedian!) would reasonably expect that these two very different covers represented the exact same album..-- AyaK (talk) 00:25, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One more thought, to illustrate the fair-use principle (and not just for Stefan2): If this discussion was about the cover to the 10-song reduced-price reissue of this album on Liberty entitled Pay You Back With Interest, which you can view here, then the argument that including this cover violated WP:NFCC#3a might have merit, because even though that album is also discussed in the text, no one would identify this album by that cover. Thus, using that cover could be viewed as an effort merely to include another non-free picture of the group, which might not be fair use. But that's simply not true of the Stop! Stop! Stop! cover, which is widely known throughout North America, as the Allmusic entries illustrate. -- AyaK (talk) 03:00, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:17, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like I've made a compelling argument for why I uploaded this cover and why it plays a key role in the identification of the album, and it should be kept. I really have nothing more to add. -- AyaK (talk) 22:50, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See Template:Infobox album#Template:Extra album cover: "However, an alternative or regional non-free cover image may be used only if the image is discussed by critical commentary within the article it is used in (see WP:NFCI)." I don't think that there is any critical commentary for the alternative cover image here (it just says that it is a "different, full-color cover image", ignoring what it looks like). Compare with similar articles, such as Sonic the Hedgehog (1991 video game), which only has an American cover, although the European and Asian ones are completely different. Besides, the most identifying information with a music album is the music, not the cover. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:05, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You do realize that a comparison of whether there is "sufficient" (by your standards) critical commentary in articles that show alternate covers, or whether there are articles that do not show alternate covers, is just an example of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, right? As I've said, I have nothing further to add, especially since only the two of us are participating in this debate. -- AyaK (talk) 05:07, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Snsd1stjapanesealbum.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive use of non-free files, see WP:NFCC#3a and File:Japan1stalbumsjjd.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 00:22, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this should be deleted since the photos just serve as alternative cover of the album in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.54.42.104 (talk) 00:54, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to agree with anything posted by Stefan2, who appears to be a real person, not a bot, but these alternate covers just look like an attempt to increase album sales by creating "collectable" limited editions. I'm afraid I'd support deletion. -- AyaK (talk) 04:31, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

kathrinamaeb (talk) 18:39, 26 September 2012 (UTC)The photos is just use as an alternative photos like in this article Step_(Kara_album). BTW, its not excessive use because the main cover is different from the alternative cover.[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:17, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I disagree that displaying a limited edition cover contributes anything to the album discussion. I understand that this group is very popular, but I don't see the limited edition cover as playing a primary role in identification. Thus, I still support deletion. I also note that the alternate cover of the Step album has been deleted. -- AyaK (talk) 22:40, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See Template:Infobox album#Template:Extra album cover: "However, an alternative or regional non-free cover image may be used only if the image is discussed by critical commentary within the article it is used in (see WP:NFCI)." There is zero discussion about the alternative cover image. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:08, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GirlsGenerationjap.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:50, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive use of non-free files, see WP:NFCC#3a. There is already a different cover: File:Japan1stalbumsjjd.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 00:38, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

kathrinamaeb (talk) 18:39, 26 September 2012 (UTC)The photos is just use as an alternative photos like in this article Step_(Kara_album). The photos is just use as an alternative photos like in this article Step_(Kara_album) but it doesn't meant to replace the Japan1stalbumsjjd.jpg. BTW, its not excessive use because the main cover is different from the alternative cover.[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:17, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This cover was used on a CD/DVD edition that wasn't just a limited edition deluxe release, so I don't think it's an automatic delete, unlike the cover above. It's a close call whether to keep it or delete it. I guess I'd lean slightly toward keeping it, but I don't really have a strong preference one way or the other. -- AyaK (talk) 22:45, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See Template:Infobox album#Template:Extra album cover: "However, an alternative or regional non-free cover image may be used only if the image is discussed by critical commentary within the article it is used in (see WP:NFCI)." There is zero discussion about the alternative cover image. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:09, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ucrdriver.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:17, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ultrabeat SFG.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

no stated source, user has credited other PD-self photos to random websites Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:19, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ultra Serbs banner.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Ultra serbs) Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:21, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UltimateWarriorStevesmall.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, likely copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:22, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ultimate speed challenge logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:22, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ultimate stick Warrior Screen 1.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:22, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ultrackerframerate.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Ultracker Technology), possible copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:22, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ultrackermotiondetection.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Ultracker Technology), possible copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ultragraffitto-1-.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:25, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Untitled FC Team Photo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:39, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Untitled FC.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:39, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IvanMishev.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:40, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IvanMishevInAction.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:40, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Scarbarians FC Logo.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:40, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Untitled prokaryotic cell.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality, we have better diagrams e.g. File:Gram-positive cellwall-schematic.png Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:41, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Untitled-.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, unverifiable source Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:42, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Untitled-2 copy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:42, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Furthur123.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image that lacks any description. Eeekster (talk) 22:56, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.