Jump to content

A Vindication of Natural Society

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Vindication of Natural Society
AuthorEdmund Burke
LanguageEnglish
SubjectPhilosophical anarchism
GenrePolitical satire
PublisherM. Cooper
Publication date
1756
Publication placeGreat Britain
ISBN0-86597-009-2
OCLC1102756444
Followed byOn the Sublime and Beautiful 
TextA Vindication of Natural Society at Wikisource
This article is part of a series on
Conservatism
in the United Kingdom
Ideologies
Principles
History
Intellectuals
Politicians
Literature
Parties
Active

Defunct

Activists
Organisations
Media
Related

A Vindication of Natural Society: or, a View of the Miseries and Evils arising to Mankind from every Species of Artificial Society is a work by Edmund Burke published in 1756. It is a satire of Lord Bolingbroke's deism. Burke confronted Bolingbroke not in the sphere of religion but civil society and government, arguing that his arguments against revealed religion could apply to all institutions. So close to Bolingbroke's style was the work that Burke's ironic intention was missed by some readers, leading Burke in his preface to the second edition (1757) to make plain that it was a satire. Nonetheless, this work was considered by William Godwin to be the first literary expression of philosophical anarchism.

Satire

[edit]

Most historians believe Vindication was intended as satire but some disagree. For example, British writer William Godwin attributed the first anarchist writing to Burke's Vindication,[1] American economist Murray Rothbard argued that Burke wrote the Vindication in earnest but later wished to disavow it for political reasons,[2] and American writer Joseph Sobran wrote that Burke's argument for anarchy was too persuasive to be a joke.[3] Rothbard's argument is based on a misunderstanding. He believes it took nine years (until 1765) for Burke to divulge that he was the author of the work, and only claimed it to be a satire to save his then spawning political career. In reality, Burke revealed both his authorship and claims the book as a satire in the preface to its second edition published in 1757, long before he would embark upon a political career.[4] Among passages that have been taken both as Jonathan Swift-style irony and as a theoretical realization of the danger such controversial opinions may have upon a career is the following:[5]

"In such a Discussion, far am I from proposing in the least to reflect on our most wise Form of Government; no more than I would in the freer Parts of my philosophical Writings, mean to object to the Piety, Truth, and Perfection of our most excellent Church.[6] ... A Man is allowed sufficient Freedom of Thought, provided he knows how to chuse his Subject properly. You may criticise freely upon the Chinese Constitution, and observe with as much Severity as you please upon the Absurd Tricks, or destructive Bigotry of the Bonzees. But the Scene is changed as you come homeward, and Atheism or Treason may be the Names given in Britain, to what would be Reason and Truth if asserted of China."[7]

Content

[edit]

The preface presents the occasion of the essay as a riposte to the philosophy of Henry St John, 1st Viscount Bolingbroke (died 1751), whose Collected Works and Letters had been published by David Mallet in 5 volumes in 1754. A new preface was written by Burke after his authorship was discovered. In this apologetic preface, he wrote that Vindication was inspired by "seeing every Mode of Religion attacked in a lively Manner, and the Foundation of every Virtue, and of all Government, sapped with great Art and much Ingenuity" in Lord Bolingbroke's collected Works.[8] About his design, Burke wrote:

"The Design was, to shew that, without the Exertion of any considerable Forces, the same Engines which were employed for the Destruction of Religion, might be employed with equal Success for the Subversion of Government; and that specious Arguments might be used against those Things which they, who doubt of every thing else, will never permit to be questioned."[9]

Burke contrasts Natural Society with Political Society beginning with a distrust of the Mind, which "every day invents some new artificial Rule to guide that Nature which if left to itself were the best and surest Guide".[10] He proposes to set out to identify those "unalterable Relations which Providence has ordained that every thing should bear to every other. These Relations, which are Truth itself, the Foundation of Virtue, and consequently, the only Measures of Happiness, should be likewise the only Measures by which we should direct our Reasoning."[11] In the spirit of the Age of Enlightenment, Burke expresses every confidence in the cumulative progress of the human condition. He writes:

"The Fabrick of Superstition has in this our Age and Nation received much ruder Shocks than it had ever felt before; and through the Chinks and Breaches of our Prison, we see such Glimmerings of Light, and feel such refreshing Airs of Liberty, as daily raise our Ardor for more. The Miseries derived to Mankind from Superstition, under the Name of Religion, and of ecclesiastical Tyranny under the Name of Church Government, have been clearly and usefully exposed."[11]

In a swift survey of history, Burke finds nothing but "Tumults, Rebellions, Massacres, Assassinations, Proscriptions, and a Series of Horror",[12] and remarks that "All Empires have been cemented in Blood" as the casualties mount in the millions, with cruelties perfected by technology.[13] Contrasted with natural liberty and natural religion, Burke sets three general forms of government, which he describes with the same emphatic detail as used in the Satires of Juvenal: starting from despotism, the simplest and most universal, where "unbounded Power proceeds Step by Step, until it has eradicated every laudable Principle";[14] then republics, which "have many Things in the Spirit of absolute Monarchy, but none more than this; a shining Merit is ever hated or suspected in a popular Assembly, as well as in a Court";[15] followed by aristocracy, which is scarcely better, as "a Genoese, or a Venetian Republick, is a concealed Despotism";[16] and finally giddy democracy, where the common people are "intoxicated with the Flatteries of their Orators".[17]

Having employed fulminating rhetoric to dispense with the artificial political societies after "so fair an Examen, wherein nothing has been exaggerated; no Fact produced which cannot be proved",[18] Burke is expected to turn to his idea of natural society for contrast. Instead, he turns his critical eye upon the mixed government, which combines monarchy, aristocracy, and a tempered democracy, the form of politics this essay's British readers would immediately identify as their own (Westminster system). His satirist's view takes it all in, painting once again in broad strokes the dilemmas of the law courts or the dissatisfactions of wealth, and closes—without actually having vindicated natural society at all. Embedded in the whirl of extravagant invective, Burke is able, like all writers of Menippean satire, to express some subversive criticism thusly: "You may criticise freely upon the Chinese Constitution, and observe with as much Severity as you please upon the Absurd Tricks, or destructive Bigotry of the Bonzees. But the Scene is changed as you come homeward, and Atheism or Treason may be the Names given in Britain, to what would be Reason and Truth if asserted of China."[7]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Godwin 1842, p. 7, footnote: "Most of the above arguments may be found much more at large in Burke's Vindication of Natural Society; a treatise in which the evils of the existing political institutions are displayed with incomparable force of reasoning and lustre of eloquence with incomparable force of reasoning and lustre of eloquence, while the intention of the author was to show that these evils were to be considered trivial."
  2. ^ Rothbard 1958.
  3. ^ Sobran 2002: "Oddly enough, the great conservative Edmund Burke began his career with an anarchist tract, arguing that the state was naturally and historically destructive of human society, life, and liberty. Later he explained that he'd intended his argument ironically, but many have doubted this. His argument for anarchy was too powerful, passionate, and cogent to be a joke. Later, as a professional politician, Burke seems to have come to terms with the state, believing that no matter how bloody its origins, it could be tamed and civilized, as in Europe, by 'the spirit of a gentleman, and the spirit of religion'. But even as he wrote, the old order he loved was already breaking down."
  4. ^ Smith 2014.
  5. ^ Weston 1958.
  6. ^ Burke 1998, p. 19.
  7. ^ a b Burke 1998, p. 52.
  8. ^ Burke 1998, p. 10.
  9. ^ Burke 1998, p. 11.
  10. ^ Peters & Somons, p. 316.
  11. ^ a b Burke 1998, p. 18.
  12. ^ Burke 1998, p. 25.
  13. ^ Burke 1998, p. 21.
  14. ^ Burke 1998, p. 36.
  15. ^ Burke 1998, p. 42.
  16. ^ Burke 1998, p. 43.
  17. ^ Burke 1998, p. 44.
  18. ^ Burke 1998, p. 47.

Bibliography

[edit]

Primary sources

[edit]

Secondary sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=A_Vindication_of_Natural_Society&oldid=1263144461"