Kite shield

A kite shield is a large, almond-shaped shield rounded at the top and curving down to a point or rounded point at the bottom. The term "kite shield" is a reference to the shield's unique shape, and is derived from its supposed similarity to a flying kite, although "leaf-shaped shield" and "almond shield" have also been used in recent literature.^[2] Since the most prominent examples of this shield have appeared on the Bayeux Tapestry, the kite shield has become closely associated with Norman warfare.^[3]

History

It is often speculated that the shield was developed for mounted cavalry, and that its dimensions correlate to the approximate space between a horse's neck and its rider's thigh.^[4] The narrow bottom is seen to be protecting the rider's left leg, and the pronounced upper curve, the rider's shoulder and torso.^[3] This is seen as an improvement over more common circular shields, such as bucklers, which afforded poor protection to the horseman's left flank, especially when charging with a lance.^[4] However, such round shields predominated in the more cavalry-orientated and nomadic cultures of Asia both long before and long after the kite shield was in use. Also, it is clearly observable on the Bayeux Tapestry that the kite shields are not held in this assumed "advantageous" point-downward position "protecting the leg" by the mounted warriors, who instead hold it point-backward away from the leg and their mount. This point-down position actually applies to how it is held when warriors are fighting on foot, such as in the English shield wall. Also, warriors of this period often rode to battles, but dismounted to fight on foot and the shield is clearly seen in the Bayeux Tapestry being used by foot soldiers, and so designating the shield as for "cavalry" only also ignores its use by foot soldiers and the fact that purely "cavalry" troops were not the norm of the period in Northern Europe.

Kite shields gained popularity, spreading throughout Western Europe during the 1000s.^[4]^[5] In the Bayeux Tapestry, most of the English are depicted on foot with kite shields, while a minority still use round shields.^[4] Aside from Normandy, they also appeared early on in parts of Spain and the Holy Roman Empire. It is unclear from which of these three regions the design originated.^[2] A theory is that the kite shield was inherited by the Normans from their Viking predecessors.^[2] However, no documentation or remains of kite shields from the Viking era have been discovered, and they were not ideally suited to the Vikings' highly mobile light infantry.^[2] Kite shields were depicted primarily on eleventh century illustrations, largely in Western Europe and the Byzantine Empire, but also in the Caucasus, the Fatimid Caliphate, and among the Kievan Rus'.^[2] For example, an eleventh century silver engraving of Saint George recovered from Bochorma, Georgia, depicts a kite shield, as do other isolated pieces of Georgian art dating to the twelfth and thirteenth centuries.^[2] Kite shields also appear on the Bab al-Nasr in Cairo, which was constructed around 1087. Arab historians usually described them as tariqa or januwiyya.^[2]

Kite shields were introduced in large numbers to the Middle East by the First Crusade, when Arab and Byzantine soldiers first observed the type being carried by Norman crusaders; these left such a favourable impression on Byzantium that they had entirely superseded round shields in the Komnenian army by the mid twelfth century.^[2]

Around the mid to late twelfth century, traditional kite shields were largely replaced by a variant in which the top was flat, rather than rounded. This change made it easier for a soldier to hold the shield upright without limiting his field of vision.^[5] Flat-topped kite shields were later phased out by most Western European armies in favour of much smaller, more compact heater shields.^[5] However, they were still being carried by Byzantine infantry well into the thirteenth century.^[3]

Construction

To compensate for their awkward nature, kite shields were equipped with enarmes, which gripped the shield tightly to the arm and facilitated keeping it in place even when a knight relaxed his arm; this was a significant departure from most earlier circular shields, which possessed only a single handle.^[5] Some examples were apparently also fitted with an additional guige strap that allowed the shield to be slung over one shoulder when not in use.^[5] Byzantine soldiers frequently carried kite shields on their backs, sometimes upside down.^[3] At the time of the First Crusade, most kite shields were still fitted with a domed metal centrepiece (shield boss), although the use of enarmes would have rendered them unnecessary.^[2] It is possible that shields may have been fitted with both enarmes and an auxiliary hand grip.

A typical kite shield was at least three feet high, being constructed of laminated wood, stretched animal hide, and iron components. Records from Byzantium in the 1200s suggest that the shield frame accounted for most of the wood and iron; its body was constructed out of hide, parchment, or hardened leather, similar to the material used on drum faces.^[3]

Gallery

Kite shield on the Bayeux tapestry, where the shield can be seen as being used "point-down" and protecting the leg by the foot soldiers, and not by the mounted soldiers, contrary to popular misconceptions
Kite shields as depicted on the Temple Pyx
A 15th century depiction of the Archangel Michael with a kiteshield
Reenactors with kite shields

References

^ Drawing from Wendelin Boeheim, Handbuch der Waffenkunde (1890), p. 172, after a miniature from the Second Bible of St Martial Abbey (early 12th century).
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Grotowski, Piotr (2009). Arms and Armour of the Warrior Saints: Tradition and Innovation in Byzantine Iconography (843–1261). Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV. pp. 231–234. ISBN 978-9004185487.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Bartusis, Mark (1997). The Late Byzantine Army: Arms and Society, 1204-1453. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 322–342. ISBN 978-0812216202.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Oakeshott, Ewart (1997) [1960]. The Archaeology of Weapons: Arms and Armour from Prehistory to the Age of Chivalry. Mineola: Dover Publications. pp. 176–177. ISBN 978-0812216202.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Newman, Paul (2001). Daily Life in the Middle Ages. Jefferson: McFarland and Company Incorporated, Publishers. pp. 214–215. ISBN 978-0786408979.

Grazebrook, George (1890). The Dates of Variously-shaped Shields With Coincident Dates and Examples.

External links

[1] Drawing from Wendelin Boeheim, Handbuch der Waffenkunde (1890), p. 172, after a miniature from the Second Bible of St Martial Abbey (early 12th century).

[Grotowski-2] ^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Grotowski, Piotr (2009). Arms and Armour of the Warrior Saints: Tradition and Innovation in Byzantine Iconography (843–1261). Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV. pp. 231–234. ISBN 978-9004185487.

[Bartusis-3] Bartusis, Mark (1997). The Late Byzantine Army: Arms and Society, 1204-1453. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 322–342. ISBN 978-0812216202.

[Oakeshott-4] Oakeshott, Ewart (1997) [1960]. The Archaeology of Weapons: Arms and Armour from Prehistory to the Age of Chivalry. Mineola: Dover Publications. pp. 176–177. ISBN 978-0812216202.

[Newman-5] Newman, Paul (2001). Daily Life in the Middle Ages. Jefferson: McFarland and Company Incorporated, Publishers. pp. 214–215. ISBN 978-0786408979.

[1]

History

Construction

Gallery

See also

References

External links