Talk:Belinda Parmar

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography Women writers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United Kingdom This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I have removed the deletion banner from the article. I agree that this article (in it's original form) was a gross violation of NPOV and correct Wikipedia style, however I've done quite a bit since then to get it tidied up. I disagree with the claims that the subject is non-notable. The subject is a well-known person in the British advertising industry, however we might have to correct the article since it mainly focuses on her journalism work. I request that we do not delete this page. --Salimfadhley (talk) 20:37, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Salim Fadhley, who is the husband of the subject of the article, continues to be the main editor of this article. This raises significant questions about neutrality / conflict of interest. Sections read like hyperbole / promotional text 82.11.177.11 (talk) 05:27, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel that there are sections which are exaggerated or promotional I suggest you remove them. --Salimfadhley (talk) 19:17, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have inserted a re-write of the article based on what seems relevant from the article aside from her quotes. Feel free to properly copy, add on, or rewrite any of this from the source. -The Great iShuffle (talk) 21:05, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Be bold! Most of the changes to this article have been to remove the puffery, I agree it's vastly overweight for the quality of references available. --Salimfadhley (talk) 22:15, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Belinda Parmar (born 12 March 1974) is the CEO of Lady Geek, a campaigning agency which "embeds empathy into companies.”^[1] She is the founder of one such campaign called Little Miss Geek, and is the author of “Little Miss Geek”^[2] and “The Empathy Era”.^[3][4]

-Honors-

In 2014, Parmar became a member of the World Economic Forum's Young Global Leader.^[5] She was also named one of Business Insider's "The 100 Most Influential Tech Women on Twitter”^[6] and was appointed Officer of the Order of the British Empire (OBE) in the 2014 Birthday Honours for services to women in technology.^[7][8] In October 2014, she was placed in Fortune's "55 most influential women on Twitter”.^[9] In June 2015, Parmar was named by The Guardian one of the "One of the UK’s leading campaigners to get more women into tech”.^[10]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Belinda Parmar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120613193215/http://www.bloomberglink.com/gatherings_participants_bio.php?gathering=33&Id=309 to http://www.bloomberglink.com/gatherings_participants_bio.php?gathering=33&Id=309

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:14, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]