Talk:Canadian Health Libraries Association

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Organizations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Canada Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Libraries Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The copyright issue cites text from our retired webpage which was based on text in Bibliotheca Medica Canadiana Winter 2000; 22(2). The webpage is retired and Bibliotheca Medica Canadiana is part of Public domain. Issues of this source can be found online for the public to access. There are some missing years that are in process of being digitized and made public. WP:CP Librarianmel (talk) 13:52, 30 July 2022 (UTC) Librarianmel (talk) 13:59, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Librarianmel, being available for free online doesn't necessarily equate to being in the public domain for copyright purposes. WP:COPYPASTE has some more information. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:11, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliotheca Medica Canadiana was an open journal that was published in print and is in process of being digitalized and is available to use: https://ocul-gue.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01OCUL_GUE/t4pdma/alma9953163981505154 - see the permisions for Bibliotheca Medica Canadiana under License Terms of Use under ejournals. The original author will be contacting permissions-en as well to confirm. Librarianmel (talk) 14:27, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am the author of the article (or page) that has raised copyright questions. This article/page first appeared in the CHLA's official journal Bibliotheca Medica Canadiana in 2000 and was written by me in my capacity as a former President (and, in fact, the first President) of CHLA. It describes the Association's foundation and was published to celebrate our first 25 years. In my opinion, copyright resides with the Association (and I may also have signed it over to them at some point) but if I remain the copyright holder I give unlimited rights to it. The whole of the journal, whose title has changed, is apparently in the public domain. I hope this will solve the perceived copyright problem. If not please let me and others know. David S Crawford. Emeritus Librarian, McGill University, Montreal. DavidC (talk) 15:05, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Though copyright in the article "CHLA/ABSC 25 years on" which I wrote in 2000 and which was published in the Association's journal (Bibliotheca Medica Canadiana) Winter 2000; 22(2) probably resides with the Association, I, as the author, am happy to release any copyright I may hold to it under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC BY-SA 3.0) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). It should be noted that the Association has stated that the whole content of Bibliotheca Medica Canadiana (which has been and is being digitised) is in the public domain. David S. Crawford DavidC (talk) 14:00, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]