Talk:The Fame Monster

	The Fame Monster has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
	The Fame Monster is the main article in the The Fame Monster series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones Date Process Result October 17, 2009 Articles for deletion Redirected December 31, 2010 Good article nominee Listed April 27, 2015 Good article reassessment Delisted March 5, 2017 Good article nominee Not listed January 25, 2018 Good article nominee Listed June 9, 2018 Good topic candidate Promoted Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Albums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum Lady Gaga High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lady Gaga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lady Gaga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lady GagaWikipedia:WikiProject Lady GagaTemplate:WikiProject Lady GagaLady Gaga High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Pop music Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Women in Music This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

A recent edit by User:Gabi.X.Pretty.X.Little.X.Mind redefined this release as the "second album' by Lady Gaga. That definition was discussed extensively in 2010 as can be seen in multiple threads at Talk:The Fame Monster/Archive 2. The consensus is that this release was a reissue of The Fame plus some extra songs defined as an EP. Variety said the release was an EP, "The first extended play ever to be nominated for the album of the year Grammy (and Gaga’s second consecutive contender for the Recording Academy’s top prize), The Fame Monster clocks in at 34 minutes over eight tracks. Less an official follow-up to Gaga’s debut album than a placeholder to keep her momentum going, the EP was bundled with The Fame for a two-album deluxe edition."

Wikipedia follows the media, and the media are generally in agreement, counting Lady Gaga's albums as 1: The Fame, 2: Born This Way, 3: Artpop, etc. This particular release is not part of the studio album sequence. The following sources support Born This Way as the second album, or Artpop as the third album, and so on:

• Observer said in 2018, "Artpop, her divisive third studio album..."
• Billboard said in 2016, "'ARTPOP' Revisited: Arguing the Pros & Cons of Lady Gaga's Challenging Third Album"
• Junkee said in 2021, "More than seven years after its ill-fated release, Lady Gaga’s third album ARTPOP is having its time on top."
• Insider said in 2013, "Artpop... As divisive as her third studio album is, it is perhaps her most Gaga project yet, in that it's her most ambitious and uncaged."
• Consequence of Sound said in 2021 that Born This Way was Gaga's "sophomore album", meaning her second one.
• USA Today said in 2020 that Chromatica is Gaga's sixth album.
• Billboard said in 2020 that Chromatica is Gaga's sixth album.

So we are not going to contradict all of these sources (and many more) by trying to redefine The Fame Monster as Gaga's second studio album. Binksternet (talk) 23:16, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The edit summary reads: "The album has been confirmed her 2nd studio album. Documents leaked last year confirming it and in a previous interview with Zane Lowe gaga confirmed she has 8 studio albums and then again on Instagram". Which documents? We don't know because they are not sourced. If they were leaked, why do they satisfy WP:LEAKS; the Lowe-Gaga interview I assume is this one, but I'm not going to watch over 60 mins to verify when that was said, and "then again on Instagram" is a WP:PRIMARYSOURCE. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 23:23, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The video is titled First listen - lady gaga & Tony Bennett and the time stamp is 2:58 Gabi.X.Pretty.X.Little.X.Mind (talk) 23:34, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's just Gaga calling Love for Sale (Tony Bennett and Lady Gaga album) her "eight studio album". If you see the sources above, you will see that Artpop, her hypothetic fourth studio album, is consistently called her third studio album. Gaga said in 2009: "I would not add, nor take away any songs from this EP.". This is pretty much the reason why we don't give undue weight to primary sources (like Gaga in this case) when secondary sources exist, because they tend to contradict themselves. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 23:42, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I personally believe its her 2nd studio album. There is a discussion on gaga daily about her having 8 studio albums and many others also believe tfm is her 2nd album. Gabi.X.Pretty.X.Little.X.Mind (talk) 00:03, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources". Gaga Daily is self-described as "the largest fan site dedicated to pop queen Lady Gaga". Per WP:RSP: "As an Internet forum, it is a self-published source that incorporates user-generated content, and is considered generally unreliable." (CC) Tbhotch^™ 00:16, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also Chromatica being promoted as her sixth album means sixth SOLO album. In that Zane and gaga interview she said she has 8 studio albums if u count her jazz records. So technically she has 6 studio albums but she counts L4S and C2C, making it 8 Gabi.X.Pretty.X.Little.X.Mind (talk) 00:19, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are not commenting on something new, just a paraphrased version of your previous comment. You need to debunk all the evidence already presented with reliable independent sources, as Gaga has demonstrated to be contradictory on her discography. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 00:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, sorry for the inconvenience, but when does the protection of this page expire? I checked the history and I didn't find when 170.51.104.30 (talk) 20:59, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been genre-warring and delivering personal attacks left and right, using the IP range Special:Contributions/170.51.104.0/21. It's a good thing this article is protected indefinitely. Binksternet (talk) 21:47, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To answer the question posed, the lock is indefinite. It will expire when the community requests it to be unprotected which can be done at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I do think the genres should be changed to Europop, dance-pop and electropop as the majority of the songs have very heavy europop influences as written in the composition sections. 2A02:C7C:382E:8E00:61E4:3DA2:8A94:316B (talk) 12:37, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

•  Not done. Wikipedia is supposed to be a summary of published facts. The song's genre can only come from publications describing the song's genre. Binksternet (talk) 12:52, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I've noticed that quite a lot of albums since The Fame Monster have also been rereleased with a bonus EP full of new material, usually available seperately as well, e.g. Born to Die: The Paradise Edition by Lana Del Rey, Animal + Cannibal by Kesha, Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded - The Re-Up by Nicki Minaj. Maybe this should be considered for the legacy and impact section. 84.69.1.151 (talk) 17:34, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

•  Not done. You need to provide a reliable source for this statement, otherwise it is just your opinion. GagaNutella^talk 00:41, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change 'iTunes' to 'digital and streaming' above Disco Heaven in the track listing section.

Source: The Fame Monster (Deluxe Edition) on Spotify

(See Talk:The Fame) 84.66.14.150 (talk) 00:37, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Xan747 (talk) 14:41, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

At the end of the second paragraph: 'The cover artwork, shot by Hedi Slimane, has a Gothic theme and was declined for release by her record company, but Gaga persuaded them.'

What I think this should be changed to: 'The album's two covers were shot by Hedi Slimane. One of the covers has a Gothic theme and was declined for release by her record company, but Gaga persuaded them.' 84.69.60.48 (talk) 13:13, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 07:02, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The infobox should say 'cover used for most standard releases' for the brunette cover and 'cover used for most deluxe releases' for the blonde cover. The two covers are interchangeable between editions depending on the region. 90.240.127.233 (talk) 20:22, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion underway at Talk:Lady_Gaga#Revisiting_the_sequencing_of_Gaga's_main_albums:_'Monster'_as_second_album.

See you there. Binksternet (talk) 22:32, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]