Talk:Umbrian language

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Languages This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Italy Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

As i said in the title, there’s no name for what the umbians called their language. There’s no 𐌔𐌍𐌉𐌅𐌖𐌊𐌉 (ikuvins), it might be an unsourced content.So im willing for someone to delete it. If i am wrong, you can reply to me. Newroderick895 (talk) 19:49, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree; from what I can see in various online books, the word ikuvins is well attested, but it's apparently just an adjectival toponym, meaning "from Iguvium". While Iguvium may have been an important centre of the Umbri, I can find no indication that this was used as the name of the Umbrian language. If there are sources to that effect, it can of course be reintroduced. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:57, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there no information about the actual language here--phonology, morphology, vocabulary, syntax...as there is for most other languages? If I cite everything, I hope it's ok if add some of this content. I'll try to make it parallel to the structure of such content as provided on, for example, the Oscan, and maybe eventually the Latin page. Johundhar (talk) 00:20, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are right, there is not much information here. Go ahead, please! Alex2006 (talk) 05:14, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the encouragement. I have started the process and will continue as time and energy allows. I am just now reminded how, when I took Italic Dialects long ago, they were introduced as the 'poor cousins' of Latin, lol. So it's long past time that a bit of 'enrichment' was thrown their way! :) Johundhar (talk) 15:15, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ars longa, Vita brevis! :-) Alex2006 (talk) 18:17, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]