Template:Did you know nominations/Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 01:58, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

DYK toolbox
DYK check Reviewer instructions Earwig's Copyvio Detector QPQ check Character count Reviewers' template Hook length

• ... that if James Stuart-Wortley had not falsified his age for the 1853 general election, Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke would now be New Zealand's youngest-ever member of parliament? Source: Henry Sewell's journal, published as a book, published the contemporary situation as quoted in the James Stuart-Wortley (New Zealand politician) article. The NZ Parliament website has a list of youngest members, with Maipi-Clarke as yet missing. This source was published just before her turning 21, which confirms where she sits in the "youngest members" list.
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Lindsey_Halligan
  • Comment: This bio was originally part of a mass DYK nomination from 17 October, i.e. on time. We've agreed to nominate five of them individually, including this one. QPQ from the original nomination. Ping to DrThneed for her info.

Moved to mainspace by Schwede66 (talk) and Moondragon21 (talk). Nominated by Schwede66 (talk) at 11:59, 25 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• I'm happy to review this one, will progress now. Chocmilk03 (talk) 20:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: New enough, noting that the article was originally nominated on 17 October. Well-sourced and well-written. Earwig check is fine (a source is flagged that was copied from the Wikipedia article). Interesting hook; AGF on Henry Sewell's journal, but other sources check out. A thorough QPQ is provided. All good to go! Chocmilk03 (talk) 21:27, 26 October 2023 (UTC)