User talk:MrOllie
If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
|
||||||||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
question
[edit]Hi, have a good time.
About this [1] ,i wanted to ask if this source [2] is valid?
By the way, is the passage acceptable in this way:
"In contemporary society, the process of buying, selling, and transferring goods, services, and other valuable commodities through computer networks is increasingly recognized as electronic commerce. This transformation is largely driven by advancements in technology, which have facilitated the integration of electronic devices into the commercial sphere. As a result, consumers are no longer constrained by geographic location and can engage in online shopping and ordering from virtually any place, provided there is internet connectivity. This ubiquity of access to digital platforms has fundamentally reshaped traditional commerce, enabling a more flexible and globally interconnected marketplace."
Thanks.
FactFinder1402 (talk) 05:39, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- No, see WP:INVESTOPEDIA. MrOllie (talk) 14:57, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply
- how about these sources? Are they reliable?
- [3],[4], [5]
- FactFinder1402 (talk) 16:07, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- With respect, you should read WP:RS thoroughly and evaluate these sorts of things yourself. If you have general questions about Wikipedia you may ask them at WP:TEAHOUSE. MrOllie (talk) 16:41, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- I ask this question because I want to add that passage to the article and I want to know if these sources are acceptable for it?
- Because I don't want it to be deleted again
- thanks.
- FactFinder1402 (talk) 17:37, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- With respect, you should read WP:RS thoroughly and evaluate these sorts of things yourself. If you have general questions about Wikipedia you may ask them at WP:TEAHOUSE. MrOllie (talk) 16:41, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Kundalini
[edit]I've been leaving you msgs everywhere. I lightly outlined som major problems and under your name ull see a slightly more outlined one. However, without knowing if it will be fix I'm only gat about 10% of the information 2601:541:800:56D0:BDA3:68E4:2275:EA94 (talk) 22:49, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- I have no idea who you are or what you're talking about. MrOllie (talk) 22:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- you emailed me and said I was "rude" simply because I said much of the content was missing or incorrect MaitreyaBuddha00 (talk) 19:01, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- No, I left a message on your user talk page (not an email) because you were making blatant personal attacks on other editors. For example you wrote:
you have no place writing this article. you understand nothing.
That is disruptive. MrOllie (talk) 19:03, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- No, I left a message on your user talk page (not an email) because you were making blatant personal attacks on other editors. For example you wrote:
- you emailed me and said I was "rude" simply because I said much of the content was missing or incorrect MaitreyaBuddha00 (talk) 19:01, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Can I add citation for exergame of the Approved "Exergame" trademarked certificate link?
[edit]or will it be considered a non approved external Link??
Appreciate your response. Ejaipal123 (talk) 03:44, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- No. Wikipedia is not interested in the doings of the trademark office. Don't add the link again. MrOllie (talk) 03:46, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
XChange Editor
[edit]Can you please review your reversion of this change. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PDF-XChange_Editor&oldid=1262037877 here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PDF-XChange_Editor&oldid=1262075391 Even though I am a random IP, I think you'll find my change was justified and not contentious. 129.96.87.34 (talk) 01:10, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Only the Viewer arguably meets Wikipedia's WP:N inclusion critera. We'd need the required in-depth, independent sourcing to turn the editor redirect into an article. If you think you can provide such sourcing, you should start a draft and use the WP:AFC process. MrOllie (talk) 01:16, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- 03467503314 2402:E000:450:4B02:0:0:0:1 (talk) 01:54, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
December 2024
[edit]You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Spider-Man. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ziggy Coltrane (talk) 05:41, 15 December 2024 (UTC)