User talk:Solicitr

Thank you for adding Richmond. I am starting an article on the congregation under its present name Beth Ahabah. I hope you will check it for accuracy or add to it.Historicist (talk) 23:57, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Historicist[reply]

...for your edits to Alaska-class cruiser! Cheers, —Ed (Talk • Contribs) 05:38, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:53, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Big Brother now, eh? Just joking. So how did you get this gig? Kierzek (talk) 00:39, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea. I didn't ask for it, it just happened. It's possible that you get it after X number of edits; I really don't know. Solicitr (talk) 12:43, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, but I would vouch for you. Kierzek (talk) 18:52, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I thought you'd be interested in learning that the Royd Baker vs. Christopher Carrie issue is now being continued on the article by User:Christopher Carrie, deleting this and that "bogus" source. De728631 (talk) 17:49, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you get involved in this. Carrie is going completely overboard this time. 88.110.207.247 (talk) 15:57, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

This discussion has moved to the [1]BLP Noticeboard isfutile:P (talk) 18:11, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"You might expect legal action as well. Fr John Tolkien may be dead, but any publication of Carrie's foul "book" would give rise to defamation claims on the part of several living members of the Tolkien family. Solicitr (talk) 20:54, 22 April 2010 (UTC)"

My "Foul Book" is published by request to hundreds of interested parties without interruption, anyone including you can get copy "FREE" by sending a request to administrator@jtolkien.com To put your comment in context I have disseminated my book 'Tolkien is Klone'it' since November 1999 yet to date not one single (legal action) has been initiated against me by a single member of the Tolkien family, says it all don't you think. What is "Fr John Tolkien may be dead" supposed to infer, the facts are he had a ten year opportunity to take "legal action" against me, he never did! However when I took action against him 'personally' he popped his clogs on the very morning the case was listed to be heard in the Royal Courts of Justice, it's in my book, you just couldn't make it up. Now for the sake of veracity let's see how long it takes you to delete my response keeping in mind I have copied this page and will reproduce it in a corner of my web site www.jtolkien.com to demonstrate you 'Solicitr' are just as cowardly as the Tolkien's when challenged by truth. [Christopher Carrie 27th October 2011] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.141.191.46 (talk) 08:05, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for unravelling 'DiNA' and 'Wirtschaft'. I have added some sort of explanation to the text. It might not be the best, so please, if you can think of anything better, then do not hesitate, edit away.
Did you find anything out about the tatooing?
Regards
RASAM (talk) 22:19, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Solicitr,
I notice that you are using a rather convoluted method of generating umlauts in the 4th SS Polizei Division article. Until recently I was in the same boat (not anymore as I now have a German keyboard), but I found (I forget how), that if you put your cursor on the spot that requires the umlaut, go to the 'Insert' field at the bottom of the edit box and click the 'Latin' tag, you get all sorts of umlauts, 'ess-seds(ß), Grave and Acute accents and so on. Click on the one that you want and hey presto, it appears in the appropiate place. It might not be as quick as having the correct keyboard, but it certainly means not having to remember complicated pieces of code!

But then you probably know this already.
Regards
RASAM (talk) 22:32, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for creating this article. Only two years ago (and I believe a little before this article was created), I had been searching for information on this to help me better understand Monte Cristo—and perhaps it still may. But for the Three Musketeers, this is fantastic. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 04:19, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edit, I'm not sure what you mean. (I can guess, but I'm not sure.) Perhaps add a footnote too? Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 23:15, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Viriditas (talk) 02:44, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oiler is a disambiguation page. If a disambiguation fix has not directed the incoming link to the correct page, please direct it to an appropriate article, and do not restore links to disambiguation pages. See WP:DISAMBIG for policy. Cheers! bd2412 T 16:13, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Actually, the better page for policy on this is Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links: "article namespace pages should not link to disambiguation pages, except when the ambiguity of a term is being discussed". bd2412 T 16:19, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for making the fix. I autocorrected a bunch of ship infoxes earlier - if these are incorrect, please let me know and I will change them to whatever is the appropriate target link. bd2412 T 16:24, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Solicitr, I just wrote my first article. I decided after well over 4,000+ edits to give it a try. I know, of course, you have written several articles, along with your many edits to World War II and Nazi Germany articles. When you get a chance I would ask that you review it for me. Thanks, Cheers- Kierzek (talk) 03:49, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For your fine contributions as to articles on ranks, insignia and uniforms of the German Army and the Schutzstaffel in World War II; and more recently as to the United States Navy oiler, I award you this Barnstar. Cheers. Kierzek (talk) 16:34, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Per a request at WP:HD#Request History Merge USS Kansas City (CA-128) and Kansas City (CA-128), I've reverted your cut and paste move of the USS Kansas City (CA-128) article. Per WP:COPYPASTE and WP:CUTPASTE, if you have made any more copy-paste moves of articles please list them at WP:REPAIR. If you feel that the article should be moved, WT:MILHIST would probably be a good place to raise a discussion]]. Mjroots (talk) 18:26, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Would you comment on these templates at WT:Ships? Thanks. Brad (talk) 03:49, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of cruiser classes of the Imperial Japanese Navy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kawasaki (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the addition of information at HMVS Cerberus. However, do you have any available sources that can verify this claim? Thanks in advance. -- saberwyn 02:17, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pacific Theater of Operations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Vella Lavella (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:59, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you've made quite a number of additions to this article in the last few days, but I don't see any new citations - some paragraphs are now entirely uncited, while in other cases there is new text inserted above an existing citation, which (if not from the named source) could be misleading. Could you please indicate which books or other reliable sources you have been using in the article? I haven't marked up "citations needed" but can of course do that if it would be helpful. With many thanks -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:06, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Solicitr, I am a bit unsure about two of the images in the article now.

The new image of Maryland does not add much to the reader's understanding of measure 1 - apart from being monochrome, it is very hard to see what if anything she is wearing. It also makes the first measure's row enormous and full of whitespace, of course. Perhaps it would be best removed. I'd remove it myself, actually, but for the fact that you seem to have reinstated the presence of 2 images of ships (Saratoga and Duluth) both wearing measure 32, Design 11A. Since the patterns shown are indeed very similar, I'm not sure I can see the logic for this - there's already Miami with 32, 1D in the same row, so again the whitespace is huge and problematic. If I recall, I removed one of the images a lot-of-editing-ago, so its reinstatement is a bit worrying as we haven't discussed it.

I'd propose to remove both Maryland and Saratoga (or Duluth) from the article, unless you have clear and cogent reasons to the contrary. If you do, then I suggest we devise a format which allows 2 images side-by-side to avoid the whitespace problem.

Thanks for your understanding. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:53, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

... This one hasn't gone away. TheWellman has contributed (very sensibly) to the discussion on the article's talk page, proposing a list of things we might do. It seems clear that we need to keep the Duluth and Saratoga images, given his arguments, so I wonder if you'd like to suggest which of his approaches (if any) you'd favour? - All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:08, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Camouflage Cup
	For making World War II ship camouflage measures of the United States Navy‎ into such a splendid, accurate and informative article. I hope you will go on to create many more Camouflage articles. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:21, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|Blocked for 'vandalism?' I assure you, I've never vandalised an article, ever- in fact I've been a frequent contributor and good wikicitizen. Surely this must be collateral damage or some other mistake}}

{{unblock-auto|1= 2001:4C28:194:520:0:0:0:0/64|2=Vandalism|3=Kww}}

I certainly didn't aim that block directly at you. I don't need identifying details, but give me a general picture. Are you editing at a school? A library? Or is it just your home cable/DSL account?—Kww(talk) 03:14, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad that things are clear now.—Kww(talk) 15:12, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me if you use the Opera browser? There's something very peculiar about this range of addresses that some vandals seem to be exploiting (which is why it is blocked) and I'm trying to figure out precisely what's happening.—Kww(talk) 15:49, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The e-mail address you are e-mailing me from won't accept responses, so I'm having to go through this path. Now that we've established that you are using Opera, can you tell me precisely what you were doing when you were blocked? I'm trying to figure out the circumstances where an Opera user appears to be editing directly out of Opera corporate headquarters.—Kww(talk) 17:02, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just a friendly reminder to also update the season record in the header of the game log when you add a game result. Cheers, Snood1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snood1 (talk • contribs) 02:56, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Baltimore Orioles season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freddy Garcia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2012 Baltimore Orioles season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kansas City

2013 Baltimore Orioles season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Josh Johnson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Baltimore Orioles season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Martin Perez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"head of Death" would be "Kopf des Todes" (grammatical name: Genitiv), could (according to the grammar rules) be rendered as "Todeskopf" (no such word is in use). "dead head" would be "toter Kopf", which nobody would say, because nobody says that "the head is living" or "the head is dead"; "toter Kopf" makes no sense. When you say "Totenkopf" it means head of a Toter, that is head of a dead person (Toter). 87.150.243.37 (talk) 00:07, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Mason (locomotive), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page K4 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Uniforms of the United States Navy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CNO (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Petty officer, first class, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CPO (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of World War II US Navy dazzle camouflage measures 31, 32 and 33: destroyers, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: World War II US Navy dazzle camouflage measures 31, 32 and 33: aircraft carriers. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 17:59, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On Flight deck. Since you're not a newbie, I'll spare you the usual template, but please stop this. You obvioulsy have an issue here, so please discuss it on the article talk page. - BilCat (talk) 20:16, 10 November 2013 (UTC) And I've reported you to an admin, per your request. - BilCat (talk) 20:35, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Flight deck. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Also, please remember that referring to another editor as a liar is considered a personal attack. Please remember WP:BRD, and that edit summaries are NOT for discussion - discuss the issue at the article talk page. If this continues you may be blocked and/or the page locked to force discussion instead of continued edit-warring. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:17, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Solicitr, please see the result of the edit warring complaint at WP:AN3#User: Solicitr reported by Damwiki1 (talk) (Result: Three editors warned). Anyone who continues to revert the article may be blocked without further ado. Pay attention to civility, and don't refer to 'lies' by other editors. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:19, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HMS Argyll (F231), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dukedom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with your assessment that Admiralty camouflage section work begun in October 1940 and reflecting combat experience through 1942 is not germane to USN patterns promulgated in 1943. The remaining wording inappropriately overstates the World War I efforts of Everett Warner in developing the USN patterns based on more recent Mid-Ocean Escort Force cooperation with the Royal Navy. I request you restore sufficient text to reflect the value of Admiralty experience.Thewellman (talk) 19:10, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Baltimore Orioles season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alex Gonzalez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aircraft in fiction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independence Day (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One of your edits was deleted as an anachronism. Think carefully before mentioning the history of science or complicated plots. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.68.199.137 (talk) 08:46, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Baltimore Orioles season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jerome Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Meister shoulderboard.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:23, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Oberwachtmeister SB.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:25, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Revieroberwachtmeister SB.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:28, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wachtmeister SB.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:31, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Currency in Dumas' Musketeer novels has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced original research with no citations in five years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:05, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Currency in Dumas' Musketeer novels is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Currency in Dumas' Musketeer novels (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:08, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit [2] back in Jan 2013, you say Tolkien wrote that Aragorn would appear as a weather-beaten forty-five to those unfamiliar with his lineage. This has been tagged as needing a reference, so I went looking for it. But although I could swear I've read that before (perhaps in WP!), I can't find the reference. Can you supply one? -- Elphion (talk) 05:36, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's in Letters. I'll look it up Solicitr (talk) 15:43, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done and edited. Actually it wasn't in Letters, but in POME (and the adjective wasn't "weatherbeaten" but "hardened.") Solicitr (talk) 16:12, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I did check Letters. HOME was my next stop, but the sheer number of refs to Aragorn was daunting -- so I thought I'd ask you first. -- Elphion (talk) 18:28, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please use "Preview" to validate all links are correct before submitting. Cheers, Snood1 (talk) 16:49, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Baltimore Orioles season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Hughes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Baltimore Orioles season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alex Gonzalez. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Baltimore Orioles season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Eduardo Rodriguez and Steve Pearce. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Baltimore Orioles season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Price. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

C

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gibson Futura, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Limba. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This may be of interest: Talk:Eric Clapton#Guitars used for woman tone. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:04, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Solicitr, 'Unprecedented' doesn't simply mean 'never been done before'. Rather, it means that something LIKE that has never been done, to the point where this new event is the model/guide for how to address subsequent events, some new rule or change as a result, some significant impact. A good litmus test is : anytime an event happens - ask what the impact is or what changed because of it.

Examples of unprecedented events are: Babe Ruth home runs (that caused MLB to make a rule change pertaining to walk off home runs), Curt Flood suing to get out of his contract, thereby ushering in Free Agency, etc.

You can read more about this on my talk page, where lively discussion has been going on. I gave some examples, and I also listed definitions from Merriam dictionary. Most sports related events and records are NOT 'unprecedented'.

I am reviewing articles for the improper use of this word. Please reconsider this. But if you still feel strongly about it, I won't start an edit war. Cheers, Brad. Entirelybs (talk) 15:17, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fender Vibrasonic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vox. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SS organization.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:44, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Baltimore Orioles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Texas Rangers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Origins of baseball, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Association. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Knickerbocker Rules, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Chadwick. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hull classification symbol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Collier. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Torpedo Alley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Royal Ingersoll. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Solicitr!

Sorry to pester you, I added content to the Ernst Röhm and Hermann Göring articles. I'm having some trouble with one editor about what is allowed to be added and what isn't, regarding linking to an existing stand-alone article. I'm not asking for you to take sides, I'm trying to get some guidance here. I added to the content of the article by creating an Awards and Decorations section. I then added some awards and decorations and provided links to their own stand-alone pages on wiki. One editor in particular has now decided that some of them are "trivial" and I, and presumably anyone, is not allowed to refer to these stand-alone articles. I have had several sections of added content on the Röhm page, and others, deleted because of this so-called trivial/menial business, yet when I've asked for a hard and fast list of all the articles I'm not allowed to refer to via links, I've not been given one. I'm not sure why a stand-alone article exists if you're not allowed to link to it? What do you think I should do here? Just never refer to an existing article via a link or persevere and hope for the best. As it stands now I just add links and wait and see if they are deleted under this new totally ambiguous decision by this editor, and then wait for the inevitable aggressive warning. Not sure what to do! Sorry for bothering you Troy von Tempest (talk) 02:44, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Reichsf.-SS Kragenspiegel.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:07, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Explain on the talk page by showing what your intentions are. --Discographer (talk) 18:34, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. Undo my edit when you're ready to begin; no problems. Best, --Discographer (talk) 22:35, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nicely done, good job! Best, --Discographer (talk) 17:37, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Beatles discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A Hard Day's Night (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Arleigh Burke-class destroyer, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - wolf 16:25, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, when adding sourced content, could you please add complete refs per WP:CITE? As an example, I've completed the ref you just added to the Arleigh Burke-class article (see here). This will help your fellow editors a great deal as they won't have to do it and it will also be of assistance to both readers and editors as it makes the cite info readily available (especially for example, when the link is dead). Thank you for your cooperation here. - wolf 16:33, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thought you might find this link useful. - wolf 16:34, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, FYI, here is another source citing the fact that the British developed, built and launched the first Ironclad: https://www.economist.com/christmas-specials/2017/12/19/the-opium-wars-still-shape-chinas-view-of-the-west, regards. Roland Of Yew (talk) 00:05, 21 February 2019 (UTC) Roland Of Yew (talk) 00:07, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:GefreiterSleeve.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Hauptwachtmeister shoulderboard.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Obergef+6Sleeve.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:ObersSleeve.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:ObergefSleeve.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:StabsgefSleeve.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What you did with Open Publication Distribution system and OPDS (Disambiguation) and is what is called an improper copy/paste move (see Special:Diff/882089074/935588806). That loses the article history. I moved the pages around to fix the history for Open Publication Distribution system. Please do not do that again. If you want to move a page use the page's move feature. If that does not work (e.g., existing target), you can request it via a number of methods including {{db-move}}, or WP:RM. For more information see H:MOVE on how to properly move pages. Thank you. —Uzume (talk) 11:31, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Strike zone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Association (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:06, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Origins of baseball, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Longball (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:43, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Solicitr,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Slatersteven and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Longball (game) for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Slatersteven (talk) 14:46, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Solicitr,

Thank you for creating Longball (game).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This is wholly unsourced.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Slatersteven (talk) 16:15, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Solicitr,

Thanks for your contributions. I just wanna quickly check on an article you created recently, Longball (game), as I do not have expertise in this area. Is there any difference between Longball (game) and Bat and ball games? If they are talking about essentially the same thing, my view is that we can redirect the Longball (game) page to bat and ball games. Please let me know what you think about this. Happy editing --Dps04 (talk) 16:43, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. A good point. I think that the one could be folded into the other, but I think Bat and ball games out to be re-organized to divide its rather all-one-heap list into categories, following Henderson and Maigaard. Solicitr (talk) 16:58, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you agree that one could be folded into the other, would you find it okay for me to merge the contents of the articles into the Bat and ball games article? It seems that Bat and ball games is the more searched for title here, but I agree with you that useful information could be extracted from Longball (game) --Dps04 (talk) 20:08, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, go ahead Solicitr (talk) 20:36, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, thanks for your contributions ~~ --Dps04 (talk) 20:49, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious to know where, in the Turkin and Thompson encyclopedias, they refer to 19th century team nicknames. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 20:41, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Afroasiatic languages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syriac.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Train Sim World, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LGV.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Solicitr,

Thank you for creating Commander Naval Air Force Pacific Fleet.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for writing article. This one only has one source, please consider adding more reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bruxton (talk) 01:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]