User talk:Horology

|style="color:#000"|

• Wikipedia Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Manual of Style
• Be bold in editing
• How to write a great article
• WikiProjects

|-

!

|- | style="color:#000"|

• Cite your sources
• Neutral Point of View
• Point of View
• Verifiability
• Uploading images
• Image use policy

|-

!

|- | style="color:#000"|

• Policy Library

|- |} |class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top"|

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

|} |}

I have noted that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky or even vandalizing. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! -- Kukini 19:34, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of WP:Wc, feel free to contact me for any assistance you may require in your wikipedia begining. But I have a question for you on this edit — what more do you know about the area and the run. And are you local, or just put two and two together (that's somewhat a specialized distinction you made).

  There are several facts I would like to have checked in the article as I rewrote it last week, and I haven't had time (To start) to locate someone in the Swiss, Italian, or Austrian wikiprojects who may be able to confirm a few things easily being somewhat local.

  Just as an example, I infer from club literature that the track is never used for bobsledding, and wrote it that way. It may not be used for luge practicing either. Then again, there is some distinction made between skeleton and cresta EQUIPMENT, or that may be a myth. Others also make 'cresta' into the name of a seperate sport, which I suspect is more a colloquialism, or club-term than a use widely observed world wide. I have established that skeleton, luge and bobsled use the same track, ideally holding 15-17 turns as defined for the various associations and the international olympic committee. So the questions devolve to why hasn't the SMTC evolved their run to follow suit, and such related matters. Apparently, they are content to have their ten turn track as a seperate 'sport' very related to 'skeleton', but not compliant with the olympics grade event of that name. Thanks for your time. // FrankB 14:44, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Milos Province Maloja (district) Communicating sequential processes Zuoz Rondout Creek Past Silvaplana Charles Frodsham Laser Pico (dinghy) Sent Baiersbronn Peter Galison Serifos Enz Soft skills World clock Balloon clock Ermoupoli

Cleanup Syros Pinhole camera Bhagavata purana Merge National flag Geodetic system Military of Hungary Add Sources Solar time Running out the clock Arrow of time Wikify Ratchet-wheel Sundance Vacations Minute repeater Expand Junkers Ju 52 Osnabrück Heraklion Prefecture

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to John Harrison has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. — Insanity Incarnate 21:41, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Message to Isanity Incarnate: I do not understand your objection to my adding a reference to the "recent history" section of the article : John Harrison , none of the other books cited cover the recent history of the Harrison clocks, and the Book by Jonathan Betts is considered the ;leading scholarly work describing the restoraution of the machines in the second quarter of the 20th century.I believe I did add a edit summary explaining what I did , please clarify.

I am a bit unexperienced in using the format tools for references and may have inadvertently saved a less than final version at one time. July 5, 22.26 Horology (talk) 22:27, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thanks for contributing your image to the Zytglogge article! (I live in Berne, but never got around to actually taking part in a tour and shooting photos of the interior.) You might want to consider uploading any future images to the Wikimedia Commons, though. This would allow every version of Wikipedia to use them in their articles, not just the English language Wikipedia. Best,  Sandstein  22:21, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So as not to overload the Zytglogge article with images, I've moved the Brunner nameplate photo to Kaspar Brunner, where I think it is more appropriate. If you move your images to the Commons and place them in the Zytglogge category, they will be visible through the gallery link at the bottom as well. Thanks again,  Sandstein  22:37, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have spent an hour trying to move the image to the commons but have not succeeded. In the process I discovered that several of my photos I had put on the commons months ago were deleted weeks ago because I made some mistake in choosing the

license. I know alot about clocks and clockmaking and have tried to contribute to many related site but I find many of the processes most confusing for a casual user who only occasionally is willing to spend an hour to contribute his expertise. Horology (talk) 00:49, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:2006-AHS-D-Mindelh- Fuessen -crop.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:26, 24 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 18:26, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the copyright warning, the image has been reposted with the approriate attribution and licese Horology (talk) 09:32, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Horology, ich habe dich als Mentoren übernommen. Für Fragen kannst du dich gerne an mich wenden (lieber im deutschen Projekt). Falls es dir lieber sein sollte, könnten wir uns natürlich auch auf englisch verständigen. Gruss--Zenit (talk) 22:51, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Horology – brauchst du mich noch als Mentoren? Wenn nicht, hinterlass mir bitte eine kurze Notiz auf meiner deutschen Diskussion. Gruss--Zenit (talk) 22:06, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zenith manufacture their own movements instead of using ETA generic movements therefore they are a manufacturer Racklever (talk) 11:38, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, ich möchte Dich als Uhrenfachmann herzlich einladen, hin und wieder mal unverbindlich im WikiProjekt Uhren vorbei zu schauen. Bestimmt kannst Du uns wertvolle Tipps geben! Grüße --Luekk (talk) 14:49, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, bitte Änderungen und Neuanlegen von Kategorie erst diskutieren und einen Konsens suchen. Die de:Kategorie:Uhrenmarke (Schweiz,aktiv) enthält gleich mehrere Fehler: 1. sie ist nicht richtig eingebunden, die einsortierten Aritkel verschwinden aus der de:Kategorie:Uhr, 2. sie ist typografisch falsch und 3. halte ich sie nicht für sinnvoll. Grüße --Luekk (talk) 19:59, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Horology, I have uploaded a lot of photographs regarding cocks, clockworks and horology to Wiki-Commons. As you say you publish a lot in English Wikipedia, maybe some of these photographes are useful. If you like, you can find them on the page http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProjekt_Uhren . Best regards. Klaus --84.56.100.78 (talk) 20:46, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Fortunat,

mein Name ist Torsten und ich komme aus Sachsen. Den Artikel über das Deutsche Uhrenmuseum Glashütte in der deutschen WP hab ich geschrieben. Ich hab gesehen, daß du auch schon an diesem Artikel gearbeitet hast. Das Original findest du hier: Deutsches Uhrenmuseum Glashütte. Mein Englisch ist nicht besonders gut. Würdest du mir helfen, diesen Artikel für die englische WP zu übersetzen?

--Torsten1963 (talk) 00:14, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Watches (specific model), which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 07:16, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:2008-AHS-CH-MIH 021Janvier crop.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 00:46, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Antiquarian Horological Society has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Neither the citations in the article nor anything found on searching indicates that the organisation satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines. (Apart from a link to the society's listing on the UK charities register, the only reference is a book which is unlikely to contain substantial coverage of an organisation founded in 1953, as its title is "Clockmaking in Oxfordshire 1400–1850".)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBW (talk) 21:41, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]