Jump to content

User talk:JArthur1984

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello JArthur1984! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Hipal (talk) 19:36, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

A barnstar for you

[edit]
The Chinese Barnstar
For your recent contributions to a variety of articles about China's economy and recent economic history. Thanks for making Wikipedia's coverage more detailed and informative! —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 14:14, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks very much, Mx. Granger! I have seen your contributions in these areas as well and likewise appreciate them. JArthur1984 (talk) 14:44, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
For your timely and helpful edits on the lead section of Cultural Revolution, thank you so much! Zinderboff(talk) 13:30, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My pleasure, thank you for raising the issue. JArthur1984 (talk) 13:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

仓星

[edit]
The Chinese Barnstar
I'm very lucky that I can contribute and learn while surrounded by editors like you. Thank you so much for your work on China-related topics, it's a real inspiration for me.
Thank you for your kind words. I likewise appreciate and learn from your efforts. It has been a pleasure to see the quality of China-related topics improve over the last few years.

A Chinese Barnstar For You!

[edit]
The Chinese Barnstar
I was going to thank you long ago, but thank you for removing WP:CRYSTALBALL and speculation on the article about the Social Credit System!. Félix An (talk) 07:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I appreciate your efforts to improve the page as well! JArthur1984 (talk) 13:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

.

[edit]

[1]


@ JArthur1984 (talk) 00:29, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ Liu, Lizhi (2024). From Click to Boom: The Political Economy of E-Commerce in China. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691254104.

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copying without attribution

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from one or more pages into Prabowo Subianto. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. This edit I mean. Nobody (talk) 06:40, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It’s my material I wrote myself. It was relevant to multiple pages. To say “attribution: me” seems either at least unnecessary and strange, or at worst some kind of self-bragging.
I am aware of the rule and apply it when adapting material written by others. Is the general trend to apply it when it is self-written material too? I thought not. JArthur1984 (talk) 13:17, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It would save time for copyright patrollers if you put in the edit summary where you wrote it first. If it isn't obvious where you copied it from, then it also isn't obvious whose text you copied. Sure, it isn't exactly a copyright problem if you wrote it yourself, but it would be easier to identify it, with an accurate edit summary. Nobody (talk) 13:23, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, thank you! I hadn’t considered that it could benefit copyright patrollers. I’ll do it. JArthur1984 (talk) 13:40, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New message from ExclusiveEditor

[edit]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Economy of China § Recent edits. ExclusiveEditor Notify Me! 13:44, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just put it up here not knowing you seem to already know about the talk. Take this as a correction to me error linking the discussion on my edit summary. ExclusiveEditor Notify Me! 14:12, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
These things happen. We were probably active simultaneously, is all. JArthur1984 (talk) 14:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Committee of 100

[edit]

This section about foreign influence is completely subjective. Committee of 100 is an organization of American citizens. It's pretty xenophobic to include that in a "history" of the organization. The paragraph was not deleted it was just moved to a section that shows it as a challenge ... a challenge for a lot of American-based nonprofits tied to an immigrant group. USN1971 (talk) 22:17, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As long as it is not in a "Criticism" section, I have no disagreement. JArthur1984 (talk) 22:25, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]