User talk:JingJongPascal

Hello, JingJongPascal!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, RegentsPark (comment) 17:41, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of wars involving India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingdom of India. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ternera. An edit you recently made to Azad Hind seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ternera (talk) 16:27, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have made a mistake, Andaman alone is 8239 , so their other territories would add up to 10k JingJongPascal (talk) 16:29, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I'm aware you've made an article titled History of overseas territories of India. It doesn't seem very complete, and I went in and made one or two grammar and format fixes. I was wondering if you had completed the article, or if you were still working on it. If it's the second, I'd suggest going to your sandbox (User:JingJongPascal/sandbox) and writing it there, before submitting it for review.

I am in no way attempting to bring you down: you've made 200 edits in about a month, which is frankly pretty impressive! Keep up the good work! -Emily (PhoenixCaelestis) (talk) 19:43, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article History of overseas territories of India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is extremely sparse, information is already covered in much more detail on their respective pages.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -Emily (PhoenixCaelestis) (talk) 17:56, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of wars involving Gujarat, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

❯❯❯ Raydann^(Talk) 07:15, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank youu JingJongPascal (talk) 09:45, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of wars involving India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Han.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit you inadvertantly defined two ref names that had already been defined. I have no knowledge of the subject matter, so I pass it back to you. Maidenhair (talk) 12:48, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Both are basically in the same page of the book so I reused the same refrence JingJongPascal (talk) 15:40, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was referring to the ref names you defined that resulted in the large, red "Cite error:" messages in the reference list. The two defined ref names are <ref name=":0"> and <ref name=":1">. In each pair of identically named, although different, references, one of the pair needs to be renamed. The corresponding references that reuse the defined reference, that has had its name changed, will also need their names changed, but it is will be difficult for anyone else to determine which correspond to the defined reference that has had it name changed, and which do not.

Maidenhair (talk) 20:35, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Alalch E. was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at List of wars involving India instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of wars involving Magadha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Alalch E. 00:54, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JingJongPascal! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —Alalch E. 00:54, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you created or have recently made significant changes to, List of wars involving Gujarat, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for pages, so it has been blanked and redirected to Kingdom of Gujarat. Three typical reasons for this are that: (1) the article's subject appears to fail our notability guidelines; (2) the article is unsourced; or (3) the sources used in the article are unreliable. The page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page.

Wikipedia:Your first article has more information about creating articles, and you may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you.

The content is not verifiable as the citations are all broken and seem to have been copied from somewhere; the names of wars may be original research. What source is being cited? Please provide a short quote from that source containing the phrase "Fourth Gujarat-Rajput War". —Alalch E. 01:04, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the List of wars involving India,only contains major powers.

This list of wars involving Gujarat is about wars involving kingdoms based in Gujarat not just Kingdom of Gujarat.

Now for "Fourth Gujarat-Rajput War"

Basically, there is no name conventions for these wars anywhere.

Basically the have fought multiple wars, I have broken them into different phases as these wars are like hundred years of time.

It took me multiple days to make this page,I had to look at each emperor separetly to see whether they had fought a war.

Each emperor has fought a war with rajputs,so it is like "First" "Second"

I have also linked that name to the page. JingJongPascal (talk) 06:34, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, please provide the text fragment from the source which you used, in which text fragment the thing you refer to as "Fourth Gujarat-Rajput War" is described. Do it here on this talk page. —Alalch E. 11:04, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't understand, Rajputs and Gujarat have fought multiple wars

Now if I named all these wars as same "Rajput-Gujarat War" it will be very confusing for the reader to see 8 wars of same name

That's why I put numbering on them like "First" "Second" JingJongPascal (talk) 12:26, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there is no source saying "First Gujarat -Rajput war" but that's the only way I can or anyone categorise these. JingJongPascal (talk) 12:28, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are incorrect to state that I do not understand. Please provide the text fragment in which the thing is described, that thing being what you named "Fourth Gujarat-Rajput War", even if the source you used does not contain that name. —Alalch E. 13:22, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

R. B. Singh (1964). History of the Chāhamānas p.125

About the conflict between Kingdom of Gujarat and Rajput dynasty Chahamanas. JingJongPascal (talk) 13:58, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a text fragment, a quote from the book, that describes specifically the thing which you named "Fourth Gujarat-Rajput War". —Alalch E. 14:06, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

there is nothing like that in book JingJongPascal (talk) 14:07, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I meant the name isn't there.

But as Archive.org is down right now I can't provide where it mentions the conflict, but you can visit the link attached to the "Fourth Gujarat-Rajput War" and see how they (whoever edited) have described the event JingJongPascal (talk) 14:16, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.—Alalch E. 14:36, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article History of India as a political entity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of India as a political entity until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Remsense ‥ 论 19:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to List of Indian Uprising battles. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 17:20, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Joshua Jonathan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Maurya Empire have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 08:52, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i know what you are trying to do JingJongPascal (talk) 07:12, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to List of Hindu-Buddhist states. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 20:22, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey can you tell me what exactly your problem is with that Maurya Empire map? Edasf (talk) 06:27, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i have told it again , someone had opened a new topic box in the article, you can see there JingJongPascal (talk) 07:36, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JingJongPascal Which map do you support?Tell? Edasf (talk) 16:20, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the one according to Romila, but the map looks ugly, but i do agree with the borders of the map.

But do not insert it into the article right now, lets wait for conseus among others too. JingJongPascal (talk) 16:28, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

basically the second one you sended JingJongPascal (talk) 16:28, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JingJongPascal You mean that similar too current? Edasf (talk) 16:30, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JingJongPascal What do you think of new maximum extent map I added? Edasf«Talk» 05:33, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of wars involving Magadha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of wars involving Magadha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Edasf (talk) 10:06, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JingJongPascal. When you copy content between articles you need to make a note of it in your edit summaries, so that editors know where it came from. Also if the content contains short form refs, for instance {{sfn}} or {{harvnb}} templates, then you also need to copy the associated cites they link with. Not copying the cites causes a 'no target error', which you may not be able to see as they are off by default. You can turn them on by following the instructions here Category:Harv and Sfn template errors, just ask if you have any questions. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 11:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, i will keep it in mind onwards. JingJongPascal (talk) 16:10, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please give your opinion for consensus please at Maurya empire tp @JingJongPascal Edasf«Talk» 07:51, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Principality of Pataliputra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Principality of Pataliputra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

RegentsPark (comment) 16:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Foreign relations of the Magadhan Empire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foreign relations of the Magadhan Empire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:11, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:12, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not inappropriately canvass discussions, as you did in this edit. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:44, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to discussions about infoboxes, and edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. This is a standard message to inform you that discussions about infoboxes, and edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:37, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The version of Indian Empire that you wrote is wholly original research, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. Please always ensure the content you add is supported by reliable sources, otherwise you are likely to find yourself unable to edit the topics you are interested in. Please take a moment to read through the policies linked above. Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:51, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Vif12vf. I noticed that you recently removed content from Haryanka dynasty without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 20:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vif12vf, I did not remove, as per Wiki , that's how dynasties has to be treated.

So Mughal dynasty. JingJongPascal (talk) 08:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The articles in question have always covered the states ruled by these dynasties, as historically there has been no dintinction between them. You cant just come in here and start changing things as you like! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 20:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Indian Empire (disambiguation). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Celia Homeford (talk) 09:41, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at List of wars involving Magadha, you may be blocked from editing. Garudam ^Talk! 16:36, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you should stop adding wrong marks to the article, I should be warning you. JingJongPascal (talk) 16:50, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then maybe the next step should be ANI. Garudam ^Talk! 16:56, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Gupta Empire, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Garudam ^Talk! 18:22, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you have been POV pushing @Garudam, removing all mentions of magadha just because you think it is not a ruler of magadha. JingJongPascal (talk) 06:11, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did at User talk:AirshipJungleman29, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Doug Weller talk 20:09, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How is that "Bad faith" all I told him is to actually read the book instead of just trading the title. @Doug Weller JingJongPascal (talk) 06:10, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that you can't see that your posts (plural) show a lack of good faith makes it even clearer that your topic ban is deserved. Doug Weller talk 08:34, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I provided him source. He ignored my source. He said I am POV pushing. He said I am doing original research. Still ignored my source. If saying "for god's sake" is considered bad faith, then alot of other things should be too JingJongPascal (talk) 08:44, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was wrong about the bit about reading the book as he said he couldn't access it. Your claim of pov pushing is, however, showing bad faith. Doug Weller talk 16:43, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My claim of pov pushing? Where have I claimed him as pov pushing.

Actually instead he is the one who is claiming me as a pseudo historical revisionist. And alot of other people too are claiming me as pov pushing in several deletion pages JingJongPascal (talk) 05:41, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not like being constantly confrontative, so I hope you take this in good faith, because I don't want you to feel unwelcome. However, it is now a consistent pattern where it is very clear that specific edits either lack consensus or have consensus explicitly against them—but you then decide that you are in the right to go ahead and make them anyway. It does not matter how right you are, moving unilaterally against consensus like this is never acceptable, and I am trying to warn you that it will likely result in a block sooner rather than later if it continues. I don't like the idea of the project losing motivated editors, but you're not giving the community many options if you do feel entitled to ignore consensus when it gets in your way. Remsense ‥ 论 09:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could I know which topic your discussing about? JingJongPascal (talk) 10:23, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Japanese occupation of India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Garudam ^Talk! 00:06, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Magadha (disambiguation), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is a disambiguation page which either: disambiguate only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)"; or disambiguate zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title. (See section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Garudam ^Talk! 00:13, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i have edited the article to include more elements, do consider now. @Garudam JingJongPascal (talk) 02:38, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Japanese occupation of India, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is a disambiguation page which either: disambiguate only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)"; or disambiguate zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title. (See section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Garudam ^Talk! 00:17, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Japanese occupation of India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japanese occupation of India until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Garudam ^Talk! 10:23, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following topic ban now applies to you:

You have been topic banned indefinitely from edits concerning India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan.

You have been sanctioned for persistent disruptive editing, canvassing discussions, original research, removing maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, and battleground editing. and assuming bad faith. Compare all the warnings on this page. And finally for recently removing the AfD template, clearly marked "do not remove this notice before the discussion is closed" from a page you created yourself.

This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with this topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything above is unclear to you. Bishonen | tålk 22:35, 30 November 2024 (UTC) Note, I withdrew two things and crossed them out on 1 December. Bishonen | tålk 20:10, 1 December 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Removing "templates", oh please, I would want you to check it again.

@Bishonen, I don't know whether you know it or not, but Gurudam was consistent in keeping a "contradictory" template.

He was wrong, he was misusing the template.

Basically the context was, whether Gupta Empire was dynasty of Magadha or not.

He was consistent on it wasnt (which is wrong) he even edited the main article to change that.

Also about original research, I have not created a single article which contains a orignal research. Please take a look again. JingJongPascal (talk) 06:08, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bishonen Garudam has been removing all mentions of magadha from gupta empire page. Because HE thinks it did not rule from magadha. He gave me a edit warning while it should be opposite. Please take action on this JingJongPascal (talk) 06:12, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since you've written these things also on my page, and you seem to have formulated your points more fully there, I'll reply there. Please note that I won't have time for a complete reply until later today. Bishonen | tålk 10:31, 1 December 2024 (UTC).[reply]

That was an extremely stupid and disruptive thing to do. When we see that sort of thing we tell the Wikimedia's emergency department, which I did. A bit of a waste of my time, a major waste of theirs. Doug Weller talk 10:48, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i apologise, the "American dream and depression" was a reference to a entertainment media. Sorry if my humour had wasted anyone's time JingJongPascal (talk) 14:24, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TheoTown is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheoTown until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 18:22, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]