User talk:MaryGaulke

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

How about getting the Dow Corning article a higher resolution version of the logo. See Exxon Mobil or Apple, Inc. where we have an svg file that has unlimited resolution. Svg files store the image as vectors that can be scaled to any size while retaining resolution.

That's a great tip, thank you!

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

October 26: Wikidata Day in New York City

You are invited to Wikidata Day in New York City at Pratt Institute School of Information in Manhattan, in celebration of Wikidata's 12th birthday. This event, held by our chapter in collaboration with Pratt and Girls Who Code, will be our third annual celebration of Wikidata Day. It will feature spotlight sessions, lightning talks, and the customary Wiki-cake, while those unable to attend in person will be able to watch a livestream. All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. Saturday, October 26, 2024 Wikidata Day in New York City (Eventbrite RSVP is required and also optionally on-wiki). 11:00 am – 5:00 pm Pratt Manhattan (rooms 201 and 214), 144 W 14th Street RSVP off-wiki is required for building entry!

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you have been canvassing — notifying a biased choice of users by mentioning them in an ongoing discussion. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. Axad12 (talk) 05:47, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I've stated in our discussion at Talk:Marc Benioff, that was not my intention and I will not do so again. Thank you for your feedback. Mary Gaulke (talk) 13:13, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mary, I trust that this note finds you well.

I thought it might be useful if we had a chat on sourcing following your declined edit request for Greystar, here [1].

If we look at source #6 in that request [2], at the very foot of the article there is a link to ‘Advertising’ (under the heading ‘Reach our Audience’). Following that link we arrive at a page where the following text can be found…

Put your brand in front of multifamily housing professionals. Multifamily Dive is a digital publication reaching over 83,500 industry decision makers. Our readers rely on our free newsletters to deliver news and trends shaping their industry. Our marketing campaigns can help you: Generate leads for your sales team. Tell your company's story via content marketing. Position your company as a leader on key industry topics. Increase brand recognition through reach and repetition.

Now, since the website is essentially ad-free, this text presumably refers to article creation. My impression therefore is that source #6 is non-WP:RS compliant, non-independent WP:SPONSORED material. This would also seem to be indicated by the fact that the article is essentially a list of direct quotes from a director at the company and the note at the top of the article stating according to a news release shared with Multifamily Dive.

In addition the website certainly offers the facility to companies that it will directly publish their press releases (details here [3]), which does not seem to me to be a hallmark of a WP:RS compliant source.

Sources #3 and #4 seem to me to be have similar features in terms of article content and the free use of direct (and potentially non-neutral) quotes from the company.

I wonder if you could give me your impression of the extent to which (particularly) source #6 is WP:RS compliant?

Kind regards, Axad12 (talk) 06:23, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See also, similar concerns on sourcing with your edit request for Madeline Bell, here [4]. Axad12 (talk) 07:07, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I appreciate you reaching out. This feedback is really helpful! It had not occurred to me that this site would be posting unlabeled sponsored content; while it offers to publish press releases, from what I can tell, it also labels them as press releases. And while the article referenced partially cites a release, I believe it lacks the signs of WP:CHURNALISM – it couches the company's news in broader industry context, has an individual byline of a reporter, and isn't structured or written like the company press release on the same matter. It looks like this particular pub has never come up at WP:RSN, nor has its parent company, Industry Dive (although Industry Dive does appear to be cited in quite a few articles). Still, I'm not sure how one could definitely prove the article is not sponsored; I'll look for other publications' coverage on the topic. Mary Gaulke (talk) 01:11, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, for clarity, the website does 2 things: (a) it offers companies the chance to have their stories written up as though they were legitimate articles, and (b) it publishes press releases which, as you say, are clearly labelled as such.

My point is that (a) is what has happened here. I only mentioned (b) as general background because (b) does not seem to me to be a hallmark of a WP:RS compliant source.

So, even if the evidence in relation to (a) did not exist I would still be concerned about RS status simply due to the existence of (b).

However, the evidence that the article in question is sponsored content seems to be quite clear. As you say, it lacks the signs of churnalism - but that is because it is an intentionally subtle form of such. The issue at stake, however, is the independence or non-independence of the content, which seems quite clear from my original post here.

Hopefully this clarifies. Axad12 (talk) 03:00, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was really helpful, thanks again. I've revised accordingly and welcome any other feedback you have! I'm also wondering if there should be a conversation at RSN about Industry Dive – undisclosed sponsored content would be a pretty serious issue. Mary Gaulke (talk) 23:40, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Axad12: Giving you a ping in case you missed this. Also happy to post a new request, just wanted to give you a chance to look first if you'd like. Mary Gaulke (talk) 10:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick note re: RSN... There doesn't need to be a thread at RSN for every source that is non-compliant with WP:RS. The criteria for fulfilling WP:RS are fairly clear and sources that do not comply should not be used under any circumstances.

There is a list of deprecated sources somewhere on Wikipedia, but inevitably such a list can hardly scratch the surface of the unreliable non-independent rubbish that accounts for the great majority of the internet. (From memory, that list consists primarily of tabloid news sources, fake news sites, etc. rather than the other kinds of source which are straightforward WP:RS fails.)

Therefore, moving forwards please apply some reasonability checks before citing sources to support COI edit requests. I would suggest (a) any mention of press releases, either in the text or anywhere else on the source article is a big red light, and (b) look for a link saying 'Advertise with us' (or similar), follow the link and determine if it talking about embedding clients' stories as pretend news items (in my experience it usually is talking about that sort of thing, as more conventional advertising is usually done through other channels). Inevitably those two points are not intended to be an exhaustive list of how one might identify such sites. Axad12 (talk) 14:25, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Totally understand not everything needs to go to RSN. My thinking was that Industry Dive appears to be a fairly major organization (some coverage I found), and its publications seem to be cited in quite a lot of articles. Undisclosed sponsored content is also, I think, a more serious allegation than run-of-the-mill churnalism, which is easier to spot and exclude at a glance. Seems worth getting something in writing to warn others editors away from the source and its affiliates. But I defer to your judgment.

I also think a mention of a press release in an article is not automatically disqualifying; e.g., WP:CHURNALISM notes that "If a reliable source decides to fact check a press release and write a story about it, it then meets the definition of coming from a reliable source." This is where I believe nuances like byline, tone, language, and reported context play a role in the evaluation. Mary Gaulke (talk) 22:23, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, those were suggested reasonability checks. Axad12 (talk) 22:50, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Modi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RangersRus (talk) 18:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Grail logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You might wish to make your client understand how lines like "He [Sanyal] was one of the architects of the G20's Global Action Plan that kept the world economy functioning during the Covid-19 pandemic." mount an exceptional claim and hence, do not belong to the article until supported by multiple reliable sources from across the globe. Or on why we cannot write stuff like "Sanyal is well known for his espousal and implementation of "process reforms" in the Indian government. These are nuts-and-bolts changes in regulations, laws and government processes aimed at making the economy more efficient.", sourced to a working paper, authored by him. Or on why undisclosed paid editing is bad. TrangaBellam (talk) 13:27, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 22: Free Culture Friday
You are invited to Foundation and Friends' Free Culture Friday at Prime Produce on Friday, November 22. This event will feature a reception with Wikimedia Foundation staff in the afternoon, followed by a more informal salon and game night, utilizing Prime Produce's vast collection of board games. No experience of anything at all is required. All are welcome! Friday, November 22, 2024 1:30 pm – 7:00 pm Prime Produce, 424 W 54th St
November 26: Wikicurious: Capturing the Moment
You are also invited to Wikicurious: Capturing the Moment, the third event of the beginner-focused Wikicurious series, at Jefferson Market Library on Tuesday, November 26, in collaboration with WikiPortraits and AfroCROWD. All are welcome to attend, especially those interested in photography or contributing to Wikimedia Commons. We will explore the art of capturing the moment through photography and learn the basics of Wikimedia Commons, and (weather-permitting) we are also planning a photo walk, so bring your camera (or use your smartphone)! Tuesday, November 26, 2024 3:00 pm – 8:00 pm Jefferson Market Library, 425 6th Ave RSVP on Eventbrite is required for event entry!
All attendees at Wikimedia NYC events are subject to the Wikimedia NYC Code of Conduct.

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MaryGaulke. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John Oyler, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MaryGaulke. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "John Oyler".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:28, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]