User talk:Nicoljaus

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Selfstudier (talk) 13:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1RR breach

Diff 1 Revision as of 14:20, 23 April 2024

Diff 2 Latest revision as of 14:45, 23 April 2024

The above edits in the space of half an hour are a clear breach of the 1 revert rule, kindly self revert. Thank you. Selfstudier (talk) 15:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm so sorry. I need to bring in this area a couple of friends to make reverts instead ne. Nicoljaus (talk) 15:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Last chance. Zero^talk 15:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I made a counter edit and removed "Palestinian". It was your group that violated 1RR Nicoljaus (talk) 15:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that's a no. Selfstudier (talk) 15:39, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Nicoljaus. Thank you.

April 2024

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for edit warring, and intent to game 1rr, you have been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

In fact Selfstudier made revert instead of Zero0000, I talked about it. Anyway, okay. Nicoljaus (talk) 16:47, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For history

I was looking for a Wikipedia account for Hiba Abu Nada to add it to Wikidata. I couldn't find it, so I did a little research. The reference in the article indicated that she participated in some WikiWrites(?) project. I didn’t find such a project, but I found the WikiRights project: https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/ويكيبيديا:ويكي_رايتس. It was organized by a certain Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor. I read the Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor article and didn't see any outside perspective, "controversy" or anything like that, just self-representation. I surfed the Internet and instantly found information that must be in the article to comply with the NPOV. I started adding [1], everything went well for two days. Then:

12:53, 23 April 2024 - Zero0000 made a complete cancellation of all additions [2]
13:14, 23 April 2024 - (20 minutes later!) Selfstudier wrote on my TP [3]
14:20 - 14:22, 23 April 2024 -‎ With two edits (first, second) I partially took into account the comment of Zero0000 about "ethnic marking", but returned the last [4].
14:27, 23 April 2024 (7 minutes later!!) Selfstudier makes a second complete cancellation of all my edits, blaming POV editing [5]
14:45, 23 April 2024‎ - I’m returning the version where I partially took into account Zero0000’s comments (removed "ethnic marking")[6]
15:10, 23 April 2024 - Selfstudier accuses me of 1RR breach. In the dialogue, I explained that the group that really violated the rule was Selfstudier&Zero0000, who obviously acted in close coordination. My first undo was part of a counter edit User talk:Nicoljaus#1RR_breach
15:41, 23 April 2024 Selfstudier writes on Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement [7]
16:10, 23 April 2024 (30 minutes later!) ScottishFinnishRadish issues an indefinite block [8]. No opportunity to write my “statement”, as well as an extremely bad faith interpretation of my remark as "an intent to game 1rr".
16:15, 23 April 2024 - Whitewashing completed [9]

Ramy Abdu, 8 October 2023: "Successive generations will remember you, and history will immortalize you as heroic knights who created for us pure glory, not stained with mud". [10]

Nicoljaus (talk) 08:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Nicoljaus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please copy my appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard or administrators' noticeboard. The circumstances of my blocking are set out here: User talk:Nicoljaus#For history. Given that the both Selfstudier and Zero0000 are currently being discussed in Arbcom (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel_articles_5/Evidence), I humbly ask you to take a fresh look at my indefinite block and soften the restrictions in some way. Nicoljaus (talk) 18:47, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. The circumstances of my blocking are set out here: [[User talk:Nicoljaus#For history]]. Given that the both Selfstudier and Zero0000 are currently being discussed in Arbcom (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel_articles_5/Evidence), I humbly ask you to take a fresh look at my indefinite block and soften the restrictions in some way. [[User:Nicoljaus|Nicoljaus]] ([[User talk:Nicoljaus#top|talk]]) 18:47, 1 December 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. The circumstances of my blocking are set out here: [[User talk:Nicoljaus#For history]]. Given that the both Selfstudier and Zero0000 are currently being discussed in Arbcom (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel_articles_5/Evidence), I humbly ask you to take a fresh look at my indefinite block and soften the restrictions in some way. [[User:Nicoljaus|Nicoljaus]] ([[User talk:Nicoljaus#top|talk]]) 18:47, 1 December 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. The circumstances of my blocking are set out here: [[User talk:Nicoljaus#For history]]. Given that the both Selfstudier and Zero0000 are currently being discussed in Arbcom (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel_articles_5/Evidence), I humbly ask you to take a fresh look at my indefinite block and soften the restrictions in some way. [[User:Nicoljaus|Nicoljaus]] ([[User talk:Nicoljaus#top|talk]]) 18:47, 1 December 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Nicoljaus (talk) 18:47, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy ping @ScottishFinnishRadish:.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:51, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They have a long history of edit warring, so I'd like to see that addressed rather than blaming others. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:20, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edit war here was only on Self and Zero's side, as shown above. I was punished again for something that happened a few years ago, right? Nicoljaus (talk) 06:11, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Make the "history of edit warring" clean, again: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Result_concerning_Selfstudier Nicoljaus (talk) 06:39, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Barkeep49: in your Evidence you said: Below is a list of every AE report closed in 2024 ([11]). But you missed the report filed by Selfstudier, in your table (2nd part) it should be right between Kashmiri and Crampcomes. Here is it: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive331#Nicoljaus--Nicoljaus (talk) 22:43, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]