User talk:Steven Russell

Hello, Steven Russell, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 05:28, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to drop a word of appreciate for your work on Abderraouf Jdey, I learned more about him myself, reading your great improvements :) Sherurcij ^{(talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject)} 04:50, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I got a message from someone said your interesd in the FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives. Well... I have updated the page to make it look "cooler". Also I started a Wikipedia:WikiProject FBI for FBI related items. -- Shane ^{(talk/contrib)} 05:27, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa, thanks for catching that missing chunk! I thought it was strangely abbreviated (of course there are still a bunch of names missing). --Dhartung | Talk 20:19, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could they be the same camp? Maybe. It hadn't occured to me. With Arabic names I have found that similarly spelled names can be transliterations of different individuals, and wildly different transliterations can map to a single individual. Who would have guessed that "Hassan" and "Ahcene" were the same name?

Do you speak Pashtun? I don't I don't know if the same transliteration problem happens with Pashtun.

Rather then merging the two article now, why don't we just put a note on the two articles, saying we don't know if they describe the same place. I don't see any overlap between the two. I'll go and re-read the transcripts of my guys, to see if they mention any of the details in your article. If they do, or if we find more information later, sure, let's merge them.

Cheers! -- Geo Swan 22:33, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings: Thanks for your edit to include historic earthquakes on the Hayward Fault. I have been considering that WP should have two articles, Geology of the San Francisco Bay Area and Seismology of the San Francisco Bay Area. The latter could then include the bayside soil conditions, BART effects, etc., that apply to both the San Andreas Hayward, and other faults in the region, with individual fault articles being significantly reduced. Do you have any interest in or knowlege to contribute to such an effort? - Leonard G. 17:20, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. Great work on referencing the Waleed al-Shehri article! Do you know about Wikipedia:Danny's contest? It's for improving unreferenced articles. The prize is $100 worth of Amazon stuff. Just thought you might be interested. All the best, – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 12:27, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe we should look into a redesign for the master FBI most wanted list. Shane ^{(talk/contrib)} 21:01, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if you know much about Adam Gadahn or not but I notice you made some recent edits to that article. I am just wondering, if you do know about him, could you clarify the middle section where it keeps talking about Gadahn's past without stating which Gadahn is meant (ie him or his father)? If this is beyond your scope feel free to ignore this message. - Abscissa 18:53, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've been noticing you putting in a lot of useful edits there. Good work. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 21:20, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please restore Pete Escovedo, as a Percussionist stub.

He is a world-famous Afro-Latin American Musician, bioloigal Father of Nicole Ritchie and brother to Sheila Escovedo aka Sheila E and father of Alejandro Escovedo a Mexican-American musician. Brother of Coke Escovedo, born Thomas Escovedo, a percussionist who played with Carlos Santana in the seventies. Pete Escovedo was also a percussionist with Santana. See List of Austin City Limits performers [1] Steven Russell 20:39, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing much to restore. It was a one-liner about possibly being the biological father of Nicole Richie. It sounds like this person is notable, so if you'd like to create an article about him, go ahead. Cheers, Fang Aili ^talk 20:56, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why you created a page for this band with the wrong name, and reverted my edit correcting the mistake on the ACL Festival page. Please look at the band's home page, read the history section, and note the name of all their albums. They clearly prefer "and the" to "y los". Moreover, Google lists 19,000 hits for 'Beto and the Fairlanes' and only 834 hits for 'Beto y los Fairlanes' (and most of those hits are redirects to the correct name). Since the band has occasionally been referred to by both names, a mention of that fact is appropriate for the article, but clearly the weight of evidence shows that the article should be titled with the name the band has chosen. TheMindsEye 19:10, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheMindsEye, I did not revert your edit, as you say. I simply restored the wikilink, to the existing page, for the same group. The "y Los" name dates back to the original name for the group. Although in hindsight I agree with your first reversion of the name to "and the" on the Festival page, since that is how they appeared at that venue. Whichever way the band's article is named (y Los vs. and the) is a matter of preference, of course, but my own personal preferences is that original names take precedence, for article titles. But my only major concern is that a wikilink should be maintained to the band's page, and I think only a singular article should be used for the multiple incarnations of the band/bands over time, since it is essentially the same group, if I am not mistaken. Cheers.Steven Russell 19:25, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Beto y Los Fairlanes, by Nuttah68 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Beto y Los Fairlanes seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Beto y Los Fairlanes, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 15:37, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• You're right, that was a bad call. I have restored the page. android79 01:30, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on Your Black Muslim Bakery! it looks great! Regards--Hourick 23:57, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for the positive feedback!Steven Russell 00:03, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Frances Howard (actress), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Frances Howard. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 08:26, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add links to Find A Grave to the References or Sources section if that content was not in fact used as a reference or a source. It can be added as an external link, but in general, the content at find a grave is not very reliable as a source. older ≠ wiser 11:44, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on EagleSoft, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g11.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Phgao 09:15, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You uploaded Image:Alyacoub1.jpg.

I uploaded Image:Ibrahim Salih Mohammed al-Yacoub 1.jpg

They are the same image, different names. Someone nominated the version I uploaded for deletion. I thought they should have nominated your version for deletion, since mine has the source URL, and the subject's correct name. No offense.

I raised my concern with the nominator's judgment at Common's village pump. Someone told me to feel free to take the {{dupe}} tag off my version and put it on your version. And I have done this.

I did the same with:

• Image:Alyacoub2.jpg and Image:Ibrahim Salih Mohammed al-Yacoub 2.jpg
• Image:Elhoorie.jpg‎ and Image:Ali Saed bin Ali el-Hoorie 1.jpg‎

I uploaded a bunch of images from the "Rewards for Justice Program" site. Do you see any other overlaps between what I uploaded and what you uploaded?

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 19:40, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Vince Bell, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vince Bell. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Guy (Help!) 12:56, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ybmblogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:12, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded locally, File:Tershallah.jpg, which was transferred to the Wikimedia Commons, has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. Please see the discussion to see why this is, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Wikimedia Commons is a central repository for freely licensed media used by all Wikimedia projects, including Wikipedia. Please be aware that policies on Commons are different than what is used on Wikipedia, including rules only allowing images that can be used for any purpose, and that images must be free or in the public domain in the United States and its country of origin (if different). File:Tershallah.jpg Martin H. (talk) 02:45, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also: File:Tershallah2.jpg. --Martin H. (talk) 02:45, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Patterson Dental, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Patterson Dental is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Patterson Dental, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Journalists killed in America, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 10:32, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mohammed Khan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

He was was sought for questioning. He was found and removed from the list. Fails WP:BIO

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. IQinn (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Mohammed Khan, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Khan. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. IQinn (talk) 15:13, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Mohammed Khan. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amjad Mohammed Khan. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:16, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Riyadh Shikawi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The attempt to find more reliable sources has failed. The merge proposal has been on the page now for ages. No signs of interest or explanations are given on both talk pages. This article here is solely base on the primary source and the fact that this name was on the FBI list for a while. For me it looks 99 % sure that it is Abdul Rahim al-Sharqawi and in this case i do not think there is much to merge. Abdul Rahim al-Sharqawi has already a section about the rendition, maybe just the fact that he was on the FBI list and then delete and redirect. If we speak about two different individuals. Then this one should be deleted because it fails WP:BIO notability and my attempt to find more reliable secondary sources have failed.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. IQinn (talk) 14:05, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Riyadh Shikawi, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riyadh Shikawi. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. IQinn (talk) 17:56, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Steven Russell! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 9 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Ahmed Ibrahim Al-Mughassil - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:04, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Yusuf Bey. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yusuf Bey. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Libbi Bosworth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libbi Bosworth until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FuriouslySerene (talk) 16:17, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The pages that you created for the Yemeni terrorism suspects Ammar Abadah Nasser al-Wa'eli, Mustafa al-Ansari, Samir Abduh Sa'id al-Maktawi, Abdulrab Muhammad Muhammad Ali al-Sayfi, Abu Nasr al-Tunisi, Amin Saad Muhammad al-Zumari and Abdullah Al-Rimi are largely duplicates of each other. It doesn't seem an efficient way to use a wiki, so I shall be trying to tidy them up a bit. Batternut (talk) 15:35, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

likewise the Alyan Muhammad Ali al-Wa'eli, Bassam Abdullah bin Bushar al-Nahdi and Omar Ahmad Omar al-Hubishi pages. Batternut (talk) 23:29, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amjad Mohammed Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amjad Mohammed Khan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 23:11, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Saud A.S. Al-Rasheed has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP of someone sought by the FBI for only two days.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 17:33, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]