Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Truth Is God's Truth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Arthur F. Holmes. Any relevant content can be merged from the history. Sandstein 04:20, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All Truth Is God's Truth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested Prod; no references; no indication of notability for this book. Title is a relatively common quote, so search produces unrelated results, though when combined with author, yields mention in Christian blogs, but no significant coverage in RS. Dialectric (talk) 21:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. Phil Bridger (talk) 07:24, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per failing WP:GNG. -- Jelly Soup (talk) 02:54, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Arthur F. Holmes#Works. Fails WP:GNG, but author appears on first glance (I haven't done significant search on him) to be notable. - Jorgath (talk) ^(contribs) 18:16, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Arthur F. Holmes. The author is notable, the work is competent but not outstanding. Suggest a short paragraph, summarising the book's main points. Jpacobb (talk) 18:23, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.