Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dream War (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 20:09, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Dream War (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No real claim of notability made. Yes, it was a finalist in a competition. But it wasn't a winner, and the competition is not particularly notable. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Prosapio (2nd nomination). Bazonka (talk) 07:55, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. —Ed!(talk) 08:09, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above reasoning. As I said in the AfD for the author, this novel just doesn't have enough coverage in reliable sources to show how its notable and the sources in the article are mostly about the author and the contest.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:11, 3 March 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep three non-trivial, independent, RS demonstrate that it meets the GNG. Merging to author's page might also be acceptable as an editorial decision. Jclemens (talk) 01:30, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NBOOK. All sources are "local boy makes good." I see no coverage of the book sufficient to warrant inclusion. Pretty clear self-promotion. BusterD (talk) 13:37, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: As a practical matter, let's merge into Stephen Prosapio, which is short enough and can easily accommodate.--Milowent • hasspoken 16:53, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, I see that in nominated for deletion too.--Milowent • hasspoken 16:54, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.