Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean Fares

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:09, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jean Fares

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pure promotion. All references provided are from press releases published by the company or from blog posts (presumably also made by the company). No reliable sources to indicate that this is a notable company. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:36, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, self-promotion. NawlinWiki (talk) 13:57, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Spam. Peridon (talk) 14:03, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as promotional spam - can find no reliable references. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:06, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. thefashionpatrol.com does not establish the notability of a couturier, it merely reflects that of the "models." -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 20:12, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, appears to be promotional, with no reliable sources to indicate why the subject of the article (and not just the celebrities who wear said subject's dresses) is notable. --Kinu ^t/_c 08:46, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete some important links are provided I dn't suggest removing —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.187.91.114 (talk) 11:52, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The important links that were provided are either merely more spam links indicating that Fares exists, and presents at various fashion shows, or are broken links that verify nothing. No real coverage here. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. And the extra content is just puffery -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:27, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as spam. GregJackP Boomer! 22:32, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment "JFC proudly raises its voice" etc. Oh dear. Why do people do things like this? Peridon (talk) 16:47, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.