Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love 101

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tawker (talk) 03:38, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Love 101

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film, as per WP:NFILM. Sole ref's are unacceptable as singular ref's (imdb/allmovie) D P 16:48, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Maybe, if you squint a little, meets the requirement of two reviews by recognized sources. I am not extremely convinced that EFilmCritic (aka Hollywood Bitchslap) represents a reliable source; on the other hand, Rotten Tomatoes counts them a source of critic reviews (and includes this one), so... On the other hand, I don't see anything wrong with the A.V. Club. If you accept EFilmCritic, that's the standard, strictly speaking. If you don't, well, there's a real review in the Topeka Capital-Journal. That's unquestionably a reliable source, but whether it has the gravitas to count for WP:NFILM is sort of another question. On the whole, I think I'd count the Topeka newspaper review, punt on the EFilmCritic reliability, and retain the article. Barely. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 17:37, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If it helps you any, I can vouch for the guy that did the review as it's most likely that they have the page listed more because of the name of the reviewer than the actual review site. Weinberg is the review critic for FearNet and posted through EFC before becoming FN's full-time reviewer. He's not really a fly by night type of guy, FWIW. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:28, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I've found enough to justify an article for this film, although I so far am not as optimistic for the other ones. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:49, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.