Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lutfor Hasan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus BLP; default to delete. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 14:24, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lutfor Hasan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable and unreferenced performer and a self-biography by User Lutfor Hasan. Fai zan 18:26, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Fai zan 18:37, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Fai zan 18:39, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:04, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:04, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Previously tagged for CSD by me. Fails to establish notability. ƬheStrike Σagle 17:05, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete-Per nom. No references included in the article. - Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 14:54, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 12:00, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - passes WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO, sources [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Has three solo albums under major record labels. --Zayeem ^(talk) 14:20, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Most of these are self-published unverified Bengali sources. Faizan (talk) 15:35, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, they are not self published, the sources are from leading Bangladeshi news outlets like Bdnews24.com, Prothom Alo, Samakal etc. Also what did you mean by "unverified Bengali sources"? --Zayeem ^(talk) 09:32, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:37, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - changing vote per the references by Zayem. - Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 10:01, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:19, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I appreciate the subject has sources & all that ... But the subject has (as noted by Faizan) written his own article which in my eyes isn't on, All editors who write about themselves get blocked and the article gets deleted so I don't see why this shouldn't be any different regardless of sources (I'm not moaning/ranting I promise ). –Davey2010^Talk 05:39, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. The self-biography proves that he was not notable enough. Faizan (talk) 15:39, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly....If he was notable someone would've wrote his article years ago!. –Davey2010^Talk 12:22, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.