Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pacifism as Pathology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ward_Churchill#Writing. MBisanz ^talk 03:05, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pacifism as Pathology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Odd little page. Found it via link from publisher's page. Page is about an article written in 1986 and published as a slender book in 1998 by Arbeiter Ring Publishing when the author, Ward Churchill had gained attention as a political activist. Page created in 2006, when Churchill was at the center of a brief tempest in the academic teapot. I brought it here instead proposing a merger because Churchill is controversial. I thought that the question of whether to merge or delete this brief article should be discussed by a wider range of editors. E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:00, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Ward_Churchill#Writing, where it is already covered. Redirection is preferable to deletion, and the page history is available for anyone who wants it. The book is not widely held or reviewed. czar 06:26, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:04, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect As user:Czar suggests. No indication of independent notability. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.