Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steal This Film 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Steal This Film#Part two. Jenks24 (talk) 16:14, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Steal This Film 2

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Fails WP:GNG. - Mr X 17:10, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:NFILMS. Lugia2453 (talk) 17:59, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Coupla comments: Is TorrentFreak a reliable source? Because I do see at least one article there, on both this film and its producers, The League of Noble Peers. Which leads me to my second point: if this film isn't notable, then surely neither is The League of Noble Peers, which only existed to make this film. If for some reason editors feel the organization is more notable, then surely a redirect and merge to The League of Noble Peers would be the way to go. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:15, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

- No, sorry, that's not correct: The League of Noble Peers was involved in the notable first film, Steal This Film, as well as its upcoming third film. It didn't just exist for STF2. Just to clarify... Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:50, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think Torrent Freak would be considered a reliable source, but we would need several more sources to that discuss the film in some detail to pass even the minimal notability threshold. A quick search reveals that The League of Noble Peers is mentioned in several books, so it may be notable.- Mr X 02:11, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, indeed, right now it's probably WP:ONESOURCE and the similar film names will yield a lot of false positives. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:40, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Steal_This_Film#Part_two. There is some coverage, but not much and not enough to merit an entry separate from the first film, where it's covered in fairly good detail. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:12, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: somebody added more Sources and content. Kevin12345678911111111 (talk) 17:59, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: same reason as kevins. Davidisawesome123 (talk) 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Redirect to Steal This Film#Part two. Yes, the article has been expanded, but does not even come close to meeting WP:GNG or WP:NFILM for a standalone article. --Bejnar (talk) 05:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.