Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traditional values

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Social conservatism. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:20, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Traditional values (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NEOlogism, no WP:GLOBALWEIGHT, unreferenced for 8 years. Looked at some of the places it's used (Poland, Wapo, Tradition) and didn't see any sign of this linked article adding value in the context of the linked from article. Philosophy project rated it Mid, so maybe it has some value? CosmicAdventure (talk) 18:57, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - very easy to source. Bearian (talk) 22:55, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:47, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:47, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:51, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to traditionalism (a disambig) or traditionalist conservatism (an article). This phrase/buzzword is essentially indistinguishable from those concepts and can be meaningfully addressed in those articles if desired. Note that a merge appears unnecessary since article is referenced. Neutrality^talk 13:55, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Traditionalist conservatism Social conservatism seems to make the most sense. The article currently is an unreferenced essay, so WP:TNT applies, but it's a viable search term, so a redirect works well in this case. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:14, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to TraditionalismSocial conservatism which correctly identifies both the basic sense (tradition), and alternative traditions. The suggested redirect to Traditionalist conservatism is clearly WRONG, as this is just one (national) form of traditionalism, and the topic is global. I would not oppose keeping the article if anyone can be bothered to find sources for it. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:53, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Social conservatism. Agree this should be redirected, but this looks to be the right catchall. Linking to a dab seems unnecessary if there's an encapsulating article, and social conservatism is broader, with a better developed global aspect than traditionalist conservatism. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 16:20, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.