Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Aleksig6
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was delete. harej 00:42, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
I'm loathe to MfD userpages, but this is taking the guidelines for what is permissible in user space beyond breaking point. Wikipedia is not Myspace and it is not a web host either. This page begins This page is dedicated to restoring...., and continues from there with a large essay about various biblical things, including a long quote of a biblical chapter, and is complete with several incomprehensible pictures. Newman Luke (talk) 00:16, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- I have stated all of my concerns on my user talk page and on the talk pages of the numerous articles, that Newman Luke proposed for deletion. Please see it there...Aleksig6 (talk) 04:38, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. — (see content of page for explanation of connection - mainly looking for a second opinion here; is anything salvageable)-Newman Luke (talk) 00:24, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Strong delete If this were in article space it'd be torpedoed as WP:SYNTH. It's no better in userspace. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 01:19, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- Refer to Wikipedia:Alternative outlets. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:21, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete, unfortunately; Wikipedia is not a web host. Glenfarclas (talk) 23:41, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.