-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 101
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Minor documentation changes #1658
Minor documentation changes #1658
Conversation
docs/USAGE.md
Outdated
@@ -20,7 +20,8 @@ | |||
| `-r` | `--html_report_name` | Optional | Name of the HTML validation report (including `.html` extension). | | |||
| `-e` | `--system_errors_report_name` | Optional | Name of the system errors report (including `.json` extension). | | |||
| `-n` | `--export_notices_schema` | Optional | Export notice schema as a json file. | | |||
| `-p` | `--pretty` | Optional | Pretty JSON validation report. If specified, the JSON validation report will be printed using JSON Pretty print. This does not impact data parsing. | | |||
| `-p` | `--pretty` | Optional | Pretty JSON validation report. If specified, the JSON validation report will be printed using JSON Pretty print. This does not impact data parsing. | | |||
| `-d` | `--date` | Optional | Date to simulate when validating, in ISO_LOCAL_DATE format like '2001-01-30'. By default, the current date is used. | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jcpitre "Date to simulate when validating" is a bit vague. What about "The date used to validate the feed for time-based rules, e.g feed_expiration_30_days
."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure. I was just copying the text from @bradyhunsaker's changes, but less vague is always good.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 💪 !
✅ Rule acceptance tests passed. |
Sorry that I overlooked updating this file with the original change. |
@bradyhunsaker You did a lot already. I'm happy to take care of small details like this |
✅ Rule acceptance tests passed. |
Summary:
Added a little bit of documentation related to #1628
gradle test
to make sure you didn't break anything